The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
76
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
28
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
27
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
29
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15342/rubygem-actionpack-4.1.5-2.fc21
27
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15413/rubygem-sprockets-2.12.1-3.fc21
25
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
418
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
76
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12057/krb5-1.11.3-29.fc19
61
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
Hi,
sorry, now is see my problem, it is not in F21, but seems to be in my eyes.
The Kernel booting is 3.17.6.-300 and
the previous one is 3.17.4-302
I had focused on 302 versus 300 and not on the more leading 6 versus 4.
Sorry for that !!!
Joerg
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Hi, folks. I wrote support into relval for creating nightly compose
test pages 'if needed', and while testing it, noticed that the
'needed' requirements were met for the 2014-12-16 compose...so what
the heck, it's now the new 'current' testing compose :) Please do chip
in and help with testing
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 14:01 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Adam Williamson <
>> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > answer to ques
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 14:01 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > answer to question of Adam, saw it in the Archives:
> > > I Downloaded and ins
On 12/17/2014 04:51 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I really need to get better at searching bugzilla...
The SELinux troubleshooter "report bug" button did that for me. ;-)
Oh, I am having other problems like with the Xfce sensor pa
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:50 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-12-15/fedora-qa.2014-12-15-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I really need to get better at searching bugzilla...
The SELinux troubleshooter "report bug" button did that for me. ;-)
--
Twitter: http://twitter.com/znmeb; OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for
Digital Journalists https://osjourno.com
Re
On 12/17/2014 04:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 16:22 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Should logrotate be trying to access this?
If so why is not the proper policy in place for it?
There is a very popular bug report on it, CC yourself on that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 16:22 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Should logrotate be trying to access this?
>
> If so why is not the proper policy in place for it?
>
There is a very popular bug report on it, CC yourself on that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163438
-- Adam Williamson
Should logrotate be trying to access this?
If so why is not the proper policy in place for it?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/18/14 00:54, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> we have never shipped torrents for the netinst isos they are so small
> that direct download has always been best
I understand the "small" reasoning. My only point was if I'm going to download
multiple ISO
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> answer to question of Adam, saw it in the Archives:
>> I Downloaded and installed immediately after the announcement of F21
>> Final release.
>
>
>
> Hm. There was a known bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:13:08 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 09:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I just noticed that the Fedora-Server-netinst.iso appears not to be
> > part of F21 release. I could not find it listed here
> > h
Install went well but took 3 hours. I believe it was problems with my
local updates repo and it switched to net updates over my slow 768Kb DSL
link (will be moving to cable 6/3Mb in a month).
After the installation and booting into F21, I went to install some apps
and got a message about meta
On Ter, 2014-12-16 at 19:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 09:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I just noticed that the Fedora-Server-netinst.iso appears not to be
> > part of F21 release. I could not find it listed here
> > http://torrents.fedoraproject.org/. I sometimes
Compose started at Wed Dec 17 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[ClanLib06]
ClanLib06-0.6.5-32.fc22.i686 requires libtolua++-5.1.so
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.1
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 02:48 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> answer to question of Adam, saw it in the Archives:
> I Downloaded and installed immediately after the announcement of F21
> Final release.
Hm. There was a known bug along these lines around Alpha, but it was
expected to be fixed
20 matches
Mail list logo
