# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-01-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We haven't met for a bit, so let's get together and check in on where
we're all at. I'm expecting ro
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 15:13 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Adam Williamson <
>> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 20:00 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > > https://fedoraproject.org/
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 15:13 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 20:00 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Rawhide_20141222_Installation
> > >
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 20:00 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Rawhide_20141222_Installation
>>
>>
>> When I grab this boot.iso and boot it, the mouse/trackpad doesn't
>> work. There is an ar
Historically /boot is owned by a particular OS installation whether
its a separate volume or a directory. I think it's sloppy as hell to
share /boot without a spec like bootloaderspec to define the exact
location each OS installs its stuff into. It's completely sane the
installer team wants to expl
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 10:30 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:27:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 12:16 +0530, Rejy M Cyriac wrote:
> >
> > > And why the subdirectories in /var cannot be mountpoints for
> > > existing partitions ? There are a
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:27:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 12:16 +0530, Rejy M Cyriac wrote:
>
> > And why the subdirectories in /var cannot be mountpoints for
> > existing partitions ? There are a way lot of subdirectories, where
> > partitions with existing data w
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:36 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting
> an existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those
> except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e., you can't reuse an
> existing partition with t
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 10:07 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/22/2015 04:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Adam Williamson <
> > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow
> > > mounting an existing partition as
Le 22/01/2015 22:36, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting an
> existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those
> except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e., you can't reuse an
> existing partition with those mountp
On 01/22/2015 04:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting an
>> existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those
>> except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e.,
On 22.01.2015 22:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting an
> existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those
> except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e., you can't reuse an
> existing partition with those mountpoin
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:20:48PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Hum, so thinking about it a bit further, I'd like to add one more
> thing to this proposal.
>
>
> On reflection I think we *should* require install of release blocking
> desktops and minimal package set to work with the froze
Adam Williamson composed on 2015-01-23 02:25 (UTC-0500):
> On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 00:58 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> triggered someone's 'why do we let this happen in the first place'
> reflex.
"Let"? This is after all Linux, not Windows. Traditional home of choices,
within reason of course. Hard
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 20:23 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> So there's either a Btrfs or a separate /var problem with fedup.
>
>
> Separate /var *used* to not work, but was supposedly fixed by
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Compose started at Fri Jan 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015
New package: bats-0.4.0-1.20141016git3b33a5a.fc22
Bash Automated Testing System
New package: perl-Dancer2-0.158000-1.fc22
Lightweight yet powerful web application framework
New package: radamsa-0.4-2.fc22
Test
16 matches
Mail list logo
