#461: Proposed Test Day - i18n
---+---
Reporter: tagoh | Owner: pschindl
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked B
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:46:31 -0800,
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Wine seems to have been broken about the same time
the kernel was bumped to 3.20. I was unable to load
any of the usual apps with yesterday's snapshot.
It may be just the latest wine update. I filed the following a few days
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Dan Mossor wrote:
> IIRC, if you don't supply --product, it returns a "Usage" error, IOW the
> --product specifier is required.
OK good. So no user is unwittingly ending up with some outcome they
haven't signed up for.
--
Chris Murphy
--
test mailing list
test
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> Good question, let's kick it up to someone who can answer authoritatively.
>
> Stephen, is this group intended for user consumption? If yes, how; if no,
> can you hide it please?
>
>
>
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
138
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11969/krb5-1.11.5-16.fc20
91
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDOR
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
67
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21
62
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21
59
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-
On February 18, 2015 12:15:27 AM PST, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image
>download
>> > locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
>> >
>> >
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150217_Summary
>> >
>> > The indiv
On 02/18/2015 04:45 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
I'd agree with Pete that this isn't *really* something we intend to
'support'; you're supposed to pick a product by, well, installing that
product (and, as a one-time thing, on fedup from <21).
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2015 3:33 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> >
> > > In my personal, arguably pedantic opinion, this isn't something that
> > > should
> > > be encouraged.
> >
> > That's
On Feb 18, 2015 3:33 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
>
> > In my personal, arguably pedantic opinion, this isn't something that
should
> > be encouraged.
>
> That's reasonable. What's the rationale for group "Fedora Server"
> being visible instead
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> I'd agree with Pete that this isn't *really* something we intend to
> 'support'; you're supposed to pick a product by, well, installing that
> product (and, as a one-time thing, on fedup from <21). You're not
> really supposed to 'convert
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Pete Travis wrote:
> In my personal, arguably pedantic opinion, this isn't something that should
> be encouraged.
That's reasonable. What's the rationale for group "Fedora Server"
being visible instead of one of the many hidden groups?
--
Chris Murphy
--
test
Wine seems to have been broken about the same time
the kernel was bumped to 3.20. I was unable to load
any of the usual apps with yesterday's snapshot.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc
On 02/18/2015 12:21 PM, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
> release valida
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:21 -0800, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test
> event for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218.
In case anyone's wondering - I nominated this nightly manually, even
though yesterday's was also nomin
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 18:49 -0700, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
> Found my bug on this -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157258
See also
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#environment-product-conflictsÂ
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1160917 , which
a
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150218. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Just testing out a F22 install, and I can't switch to VT2 at all. Actually,
only VT1 and VT4 appear to be active.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194015
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-970
#461: Proposed Test Day - i18n
---+---
Reporter: tagoh | Owner: pschindl
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
Blocked B
> > You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> > locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150217_Summary
> >
> > The individual test result pages are:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wik
21 matches
Mail list logo
