The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
92
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20
68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
68
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21
64
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21
60
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 14:04 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Seems like all of my rawhide filed bugs are still set to rawhide,
> not 22. Is there a point in time when these automatically get
> flipped to 22?
There usually is some kind of mass conversion, yeah, not sure when
it's planned to happen.
Greetings Testers!
With the F22 switch from yum to dnf as a package manager, there was a need to
figure out what the scope would be for QA testing. Naturally, to define the
scope for a subset, I had to figure out (at least in a general sense) how
large the complete set is. There's a multitude of c
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 02:35 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I downloaded the generic x86_64 boot iso from
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched-20150218/22/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso
> which was linked to from
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_2015021
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:17 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-26/fedora-qa.2015-01-26-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:20 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-02-02/fedora-qa.2015-02-02-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-02-16/fedora-qa.2015-02-16-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
Hi folks! I'm tentatively suggesting we cancel the QA meeting on
Monday, but that's assuming we do a blocker review meeting. I think
it'd be good to check in on the status of 22 Alpha in general, but we
can do that within the blocker review meeting assuming we have one.
I don't think we have an
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-02-23
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of the week again! After another week of testing we
have 4 proposed Alpha blockers and 2 proposed for final.
If you want to take a look at the proposed or accepte
I just tried using branched-20150220/22/i386/ to install to an i915G HTTP via
Grub loading vmlinuz and initrd.img, same as most of my installations. It got
me to the first GUI screen. I clicked Continue and was left with a mouse
pointer on a black screen. cat /proc/cmdline ends with inst.resolut
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 22:41 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> I just tried using branched-20150220/22/i386/ to install to an i915G
> HTTP via
> Grub loading vmlinuz and initrd.img, same as most of my
> installations. It got
> me to the first GUI screen. I clicked Continue and was left
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
69
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21
64
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21
61
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
93
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
69
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20
69
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
14 matches
Mail list logo
