On 03/02/2015 06:02 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
So how does one set up printing (to a networked HP 2605dn)
in such a way that /bin/lp works properly?
Have you tried system-config-printer?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:16:56PM -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Obviously when installing F22 now, you have that new password security
> level to make you jump through hoops to set a password during install.
> I understand the reasoning for "secure" passwords, but there is one
> catc
On 03/02/2015 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:55:09 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Seems to run fine. I did not notice any differences
with 4.10. Still no xfprint; ?Que paso?
There's not too many radical changes.
See:
http://xfce.org/about/news/?post=1425081600
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 22:46 +, Alexander Bisogianis wrote:
> > I'm not seeing anything like that on my F22 desktop.
> >
>
> I mean while installing F22, all four CPUs on the KVM host (F21) are
> constantly at 100% usage.
>
> Running top in TTY2, while F22 is installing, I see:
>
> Xorg usi
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:55:09 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Seems to run fine. I did not notice any differences
> with 4.10. Still no xfprint; ?Que paso?
There's not too many radical changes.
See:
http://xfce.org/about/news/?post=1425081600
for highlights and a tour post of the new
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2563/compat-libuv010-0.10.34-1.fc22
4
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2673/jetty-9.2.9-1.fc22
4
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
> I'm not seeing anything like that on my F22 desktop.
>
I mean while installing F22, all four CPUs on the KVM host (F21) are constantly
at 100% usage.
Running top in TTY2, while F22 is installing, I see:
Xorg using constantly CPU 60%-70%
2 anaconda processes using constantly CPU 60%-70%
I ca
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 22:21 +, Alexander Bisogianis wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I am currently installing F22 from the boot.iso (chose
> ~Workstation), on KVM F21
>
> Everything seems to work, but all 4 CPUs is at 100% constantly. I
> think that we need to see why it blasts the CPUs to 100%, becau
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 17:16:09 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-03-02/f22-blocker-review.2015-03-02-
Hi all.
I am currently installing F22 from the boot.iso (chose ~Workstation), on KVM F21
Everything seems to work, but all 4 CPUs is at 100% constantly.
I think that we need to see why it blasts the CPUs to 100%, because I don't
think this is resonable.
Abis.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fe
Hey all,
Obviously when installing F22 now, you have that new password security
level to make you jump through hoops to set a password during install.
I understand the reasoning for "secure" passwords, but there is one
catch.
*I* am the admin at my house hold, and *I* am the admin at my company
(
Seems to run fine. I did not notice any differences
with 4.10. Still no xfprint; ?Que paso?
On 02/28/2015 06:15 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Xfce 4.12 was released today. The following packages are available on
rawhide.
* exo
* garcon
* gtk-xfc
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 11:22 -0500, Scott Poore wrote:
> I know this is late but, does this bug qualify as a blocker?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197290
>
> This is the relevant criteria for Alpha:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Remote_aut
I know this is late but, does this bug qualify as a blocker?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197290
This is the relevant criteria for Alpha:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Remote_authentication
Since "Non-interactive only" was an exception, I didn't
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 16:21 +0530, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was thinking on i18n test day going to happen on 19th March
> 2015.
> Presently we have page [1] with available test cases. I have some
> suggestions for improvement.
>
>1. Splitting test cases into Generic (
- Original Message -
| From: "Kamil Paral"
| To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
| Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 6:15:24 PM
| Subject: Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-03-02 @16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
|
| > If you have any other topic ideas, please reply to this mail and we'll
| > add them in th
> If you have any other topic ideas, please reply to this mail and we'll
> add them in the meeting! Thanks folks.
I'd like to discuss summer time change in North America and how it affects our
meetings. Currently, we have 3 meetings directly following each other:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/ca
Sorry for not having risen more data. First, abrt not report the
failure when it occurs, it may be because the program is not java and c
++ (not know). Arduino version that is currently in the repositories
for Fedora rawhide 22, is the 1.0.5-8 fedora 21 fedora worked fine in
21. The version of j
Hi All,
I was thinking on i18n test day going to happen on 19th March 2015.
Presently we have page [1] with available test cases. I have some
suggestions for improvement.
1. Splitting test cases into Generic (everyone), America, APAC and EMEA
region.
Each test case does not make sen
19 matches
Mail list logo
