On 05/08/2015 02:32 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
I just gave fedup a try and found myself confronted with this:
# yum update
...
The situation has worsened:
,,,
WARNING: potential problems with upgrade
4:texlive-luatex-bin-svn31084.0-7.1.20140525_r34255.fc21.x86_64 (no
replacement) requir
Compose started at Wed May 13 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[gooddata-cl]
gooddata-cl-1.2.73-1.fc21.noarch requires jackrabbit-webdav
[maven-wagon]
maven-wagon-webdav-jackrabbit-2.8-1.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(org
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 16:36 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 15:11:00 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
>
> > So, I'd like to get sufficient votes on the proposed blockers and
> > at
> > least the significant proposed FEs as soon as possible. Would folks
> > prefer voting on-list
Compose started at Wed May 13 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Macaulay2]
Macaulay2-1.6-10.fc22.i686 requires libntl.so.9
[dmlite-plugins-memcache]
dmlite-plugins-memcache-0.5.0-7.fc20.i686 requires libprotobuf.so.8
[
Hi,
tested today again the colour printing with my Canon Pixma MP540 printer
(currently tested with libre office). Still no printing of turquoise colours
with my Pixma printer possible. F21 can print turquoise colours with this
Pixma. Still printer driver for the Canon Pixma MP540 worse then in
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 03:19 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > Have a good weekend and see you Monday!
>
> Clarification: On Thursday. Just to make sure we don't confuse
> anybody.
sigh...spot the copy/paste fail.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
47
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4531/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc22
41
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5279/strongswan-5.3.0-1.fc22
33
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5
> # F22 Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2015-05-14
> # Time: 1600 UTC
> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
>
> As I suggested in my earlier mail, let's do a special blocker review
> meeting to clear out the proposed blockers and FEs that have shown up
> since Monday! Let's mak
