Fedora 22 updates-testing report

2015-06-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 64 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 63 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5948/asterisk-13.3.2-1.fc22 42 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2015-06-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 133 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 78 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21 62 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

Fedora 20 updates-testing report

2015-06-12 Thread updates
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 173 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20 128 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20 111 http

Re: [Fedora QA] #471: amend/remove "release notes" criterion

2015-06-12 Thread Fedora QA
#471: amend/remove "release notes" criterion ---+--- Reporter: kparal| Owner: adamwill Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 23 Component: Release criteria |

Criteria proposal: remove media part of release notes criterion

2015-06-12 Thread Adam Williamson
Per https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/471 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221920 , it seems we no longer want to require release notes to be present on all media. For simplicity's sake, I suggest we simply remove the media section of the criterion entirely. We could I sup

Re: [Fedora QA] #471: amend/remove "release notes" criterion

2015-06-12 Thread Fedora QA
#471: amend/remove "release notes" criterion ---+--- Reporter: kparal| Owner: adamwill Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 23 Component: Release criteria |

[Test-Announce] armv7 resources for package maintainers and qa folks

2015-06-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. I'd like to let package maintainers and qa folks know that we have some armv7 instances available if they need to debug/test/build/check something. For people in the 'packagers' fas group: arm03-packager00.cloud.fedoraproject.org - Fedora 22 arm03-packager01.cloud.fedoraproject.org

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 13:38:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because remixes wouldn't be able to ship the source, then. Has that been checked by legal? Having a trademarked image in a source file is different from displaying the trad

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 19:46:53 -0500 Kevin Martin wrote: > I upgraded fedora-release and can now run an upgrade of my system but > it still never gets a systemd upgrade past systemd-219-13. Is that > the latest rawhide version? No. 220 has been out a while now. ;( Can you try doing: dnf upd

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

2015-06-12 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 01:38:31 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 11:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:55:47 -0500 > > > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, > > > > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Jun 201