On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 19:17 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
>
> On 10/15/2015 04:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 13:00 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> > > I installed the new USB-creator in f23 Cinnamon (EFI) boot
> > >
> > > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/liveu
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
72 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739
python-kdcproxy-0.3.2-1.fc23
56 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13824
python-django-1.8.4-1.fc23
54 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 13:00 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> I installed the new USB-creator in f23 Cinnamon (EFI) boot
>
> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/liveusb-creator/
> selected: mate x86_64 :
>
> Results:
> liveusb-creator doesn't create bootable Live i686 image in default cp
>
On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 17:12 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151014
>
> No images in Rawhide 20151014 but not this.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 23 of 52
>
> ID: 6068 Test: x86_64 universal server_no_swap@uefi
>
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151014
No images in Rawhide 20151014 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 23 of 52
ID: 6068Test: x86_64 universal server_no_swap@uefi
ID: 6066Test: x86_64 universal server_software_raid
ID: 6055Test: i
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151014
No images in 23 Branched 20151014 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 7 of 52
ID: 6051Test: i386 workstation_live default_install
ID: 6039Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install
ID: 5989Test:
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
71 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739
python-kdcproxy-0.3.2-1.fc23
56 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-13824
python-django-1.8.4-1.fc23
54 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
I installed the new USB-creator in f23 Cinnamon (EFI) boot
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mbriza/liveusb-creator/
selected: mate x86_64 :
Results:
liveusb-creator doesn't create bootable Live i686 image in default cp mode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264012
"syslinux 6.03
Hi,
i used the word admin wrongly, in my private system the only admin is root and
I used the root pw. But anyway, when today Gnome SW asked for the root pw, it
was accepted, and Gnome SW installed apps. Why? I don't know, possibly an dnf
update. I also have had problems in installing apps in F2
On 15.10.2015 18:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/15/2015 04:10 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 15.10.2015 12:47, Jon Ingason wrote:
Den 2015-10-15 kl. 10:44, skrev Joachim Backes:
So it seems that the ":" in the filename "vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10"
is the culprit.
: is a builtin command in sh (
On 10/14/2015 05:51 AM, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
I know it's out of topic, but I have had today urgent Gnome problems with F23
Final TC9 Gnome SW and now really unexpected situation with Gnome SW F22.
Installed F22, last build, to a 32GB usb flash medium. dnf su admin pw, ok. dnf
update ok. Tri
On 10/15/2015 04:10 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 15.10.2015 12:47, Jon Ingason wrote:
Den 2015-10-15 kl. 10:44, skrev Joachim Backes:
So it seems that the ":" in the filename "vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10"
is the culprit.
: is a builtin command in sh (and all derivative), see man builtins.
Hi,
downloaded liveusb-creator-3.15.0-0.1.newui.20151001git7b9a156b.fc23.noarch.rpm
2015-Oct-01 12:41:18716.3K application/x-rpm, 64bit, F23, installation of
a F23 build (which one takes the liveusbcreator ?) to usb flash medium
successful, boot of liveCD not possible ---> Test failed
- H
Hey,
I'm back with a plea to test the new LiveUSB Creator.
It's been developed for a while and we'd like to have as many people test
it as possible. The Fedora Copr packages are at [1] and if you'd like to
have the source code directly, go for [2].
Please direct the bug reports to the pull re
On 15.10.2015 16:12, Jon Ingason wrote:
Den 2015-10-15 kl. 15:35, skrev Joachim Backes:
On 15.10.2015 14:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/15/2015 07:10 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
This can't be the problem! Otherwise, I would have similar problems
with filenames containing "." (dots) in the names, be
Den 2015-10-15 kl. 15:35, skrev Joachim Backes:
> On 15.10.2015 14:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/15/2015 07:10 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> This can't be the problem! Otherwise, I would have similar problems
>>> with filenames containing "." (dots) in the names, because "." is a
>>> builtin comma
On 15.10.2015 14:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/15/2015 07:10 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
This can't be the problem! Otherwise, I would have similar problems with filenames containing
"." (dots) in the names, because "." is a builtin command too.
I think it is a problem Why?
If I
mkdir vb-2
Hiya,
I've been getting selinux AVC denial notifications recently but
clicking on them opens up sealert which says there's nothing to do.
Anyone else seeing this?
[asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk SRPMS]$ rpm -qa \*selinux\*
libselinux-debuginfo-2.4-3.fc23.x86_64
libselinux-python-2.4-4.fc23.x86_
Hi,
installed rapid-photo-downloader 0.4.10-3.fc23, I don't find a way to start
this app. i.e. in Gnome SW I click on the icon concerned, nothing happens, no
program start. In F22 the version 0.4.10-2.fc21 is ok. Problem of
Rapid-Foto-Downloader or Gnome SW, or something else in F23? Also
rapi
Den 2015-10-15 kl. 13:10, skrev Joachim Backes:
> On 15.10.2015 12:47, Jon Ingason wrote:
>> Den 2015-10-15 kl. 10:44, skrev Joachim Backes:
>>> Hi F23 testers,
>>> vb-2015-10-15_07-51-53-win10
>>>
>>> So it seems that the ":" in the filename "vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10"
>>> is the culprit.
>>
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:44:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F23 testers,
>
> having a directory xyz with a subdir called
>
> vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10
>
> This subdir has some entries:
>
> drwxrwxr-x 3 backes backes4096 Oct 12 18:01 Machines
> drwx-- 4 backes backes40
Compose started at Thu Oct 15 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Compose started at Thu Oct 15 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[openstack-swift]
openstack-swift-2.3.0-2.fc23.noarch requires python-pyeclib
[python-fiat]
python-fiat-1.5.0-2.fc23.noarch requires ScientificPython
On 10/15/2015 07:10 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> This can't be the problem! Otherwise, I would have similar problems with
> filenames containing "." (dots) in the names, because "." is a builtin
> command too.
I think it is a problem Why?
If I
mkdir vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10 and then
Was banging my head against a wall trying to work out why I could no longer
push/pull from our git repo ...
After blaming networks for a bit realised that removing the gnome-keyring
credential helper allowed git to work.
Found that something similar, which I expect to be the root cause, was
alrea
On 15.10.2015 12:47, Jon Ingason wrote:
Den 2015-10-15 kl. 10:44, skrev Joachim Backes:
Hi F23 testers,
having a directory xyz with a subdir called
vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10
This subdir has some entries:
drwxrwxr-x 3 backes backes4096 Oct 12 18:01 Machines
drwx-- 4 backes back
Den 2015-10-15 kl. 10:44, skrev Joachim Backes:
> Hi F23 testers,
>
> having a directory xyz with a subdir called
>
> vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10
>
> This subdir has some entries:
>
> drwxrwxr-x 3 backes backes4096 Oct 12 18:01 Machines
> drwx-- 4 backes backes4096 Oct 15 0
Hi Karel,
it was my root pw, I tried at the same time more then once dnf su successful
and the pw was always ok. It was no "mistyping" of the pw, there was somethimg
wrong in the sytem. But meanwhile, because my Gnome SW problems in F23 ( bug
1271520 ) , which had appeared on the same day as th
Hi F23 testers,
having a directory xyz with a subdir called
vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10
This subdir has some entries:
drwxrwxr-x 3 backes backes4096 Oct 12 18:01 Machines
drwx-- 4 backes backes4096 Oct 15 06:59 VirtualBox VMs
-rw--- 1 backes backes 20409483264 Oct 15 0
Hi,
Admin password requested, correct admin pw always rejected.
Any idea?
just a wild shot ... was it really the admin password which was requested?
I remember once I've met some dialogue that confused me to enter the root
password while in fact it needed the user password as all it did was
30 matches
Mail list logo
