rawhide report: 20151120 changes

2015-11-20 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Nov 20 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2015 07:16 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> The biggest issue is this, I think. We probably need to encode >> "Special Blockers" into the Go/No-Go process. I don't think that >> assurance that it will be fixed on time is necessarily good >>

Re: Rawhide, kernels and NVIDIA

2015-11-20 Thread Russel Winder
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 08:02 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:57 AM, Russel Winder > wrote: > > > Since kernel 4.1.0, I have not been able to get an NVIDIA > > driver/support to compile and work on Rawhide. Either the download > > would not compile at

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-20 Thread Kamil Paral
> > My suggestion would be that we make sure 'blockerbugs' includes > > lists of each type of blocker. Ahead of and at Go/No-Go meetings, > > we would want to have a formal assurance from the person > > responsible for fixing the bug that the fix would be provided by a > > certain time - say, one

[Test-Announce]Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151120 nightly compose nominated for testing

2015-11-20 Thread adamwill
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 24 Rawhide 20151120. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Fedora 23 updates-testing report

2015-11-20 Thread updates
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing: Age URL 107 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739 python-kdcproxy-0.3.2-1.fc23 89 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5eb2131441 conntrack-tools-1.4.2-9.fc23 86

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-20 Thread Kamil Paral
> #2 MOAR METADATA > > > The alternative is to make the existing Blocker trackers do more work. > In this model we wouldn't add any new tracker bugs; we'd just add new > 'magic words' in the Whiteboard field. Right now, an accepted blocker > is identified by the string

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

2015-11-20 Thread updates
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 224 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878 echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 173 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 106

Re: Rawhide, kernels and NVIDIA

2015-11-20 Thread Peter Robinson
>> > Since kernel 4.1.0, I have not been able to get an NVIDIA >> > driver/support to compile and work on Rawhide. Either the download >> > would not compile at all, or now it compiles but fails to work >> > correctly. As far as I can tell (I may well be wrong) the beta >> > 358.09 >> > is the

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-20 Thread Sudhir D
On 11/19/2015 11:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 19:09 +0530, Sudhir D wrote: I suggest we have only one ZeroDay i.e., for Final and do away with intermediate ones. As I see it, ZeroDay comes with cost and we also need to have basic sanity testcases automated to ensure

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-20 Thread Petr Schindler
Stephen Gallagher píše v Čt 19. 11. 2015 v 15:50 -0500: > On 11/18/2015 07:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > With either approach, the basic goal is to make it more feasible > > to keep an eye on each of the different categories of 'release > > blocker' bugs; right now we have solid processes

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-20 Thread Kalev Lember
On 11/20/2015 03:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2015 07:16 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: The biggest issue is this, I think. We probably need to encode "Special Blockers" into the Go/No-Go process. I don't think that assurance that it will be

Fedora Rawhide 20151120 compose check report

2015-11-20 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151119: Kde disk raw armhfp Xfce disk raw armhfp Lxde disk raw armhfp Lxde live i386 Xfce live

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

2015-11-20 Thread updates
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 294 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467 openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 174 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9141 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc21 163

[Test-Announce]2015-11-23 @ 1700 Fedora 24 Blocker Review

2015-11-20 Thread Adam Williamson
# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-11-23 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! I think it's time we run the first blocker review meeting of the F24 cycle. There are a couple of proposed blockers to go through, so we may as well get started early

[Test-Announce]2015-11-23 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2015-11-20 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2015-11-23 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's QA meeting time again! My non-media blocker process email seems to have generated a lot of