On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Joerg Lechner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> there is still the Anaconda problem of F25 Alpha in F25 Beta. Still not
>> possible to install on usb connected media.
>> Same Dracut error message as previously. Will it be pos
Hi Chris,
My system is an Acer laptop, bought 2 years ago with Windows 8.1, also EFI.
I use AOL since 1995, at this time I had the choice between Compuserve (more
for experts) and AOL (more for non experts). I will think about Your proposal.
Kind regards
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung--
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
47 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9b3ed5f170
chicken-4.11.0-3.fc25
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f55f5b10dc
freeimage-3.17.0-7.fc25
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/update
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> there is still the Anaconda problem of F25 Alpha in F25 Beta. Still not
> possible to install on usb connected media.
> Same Dracut error message as previously. Will it be possible to use usb
> connected media in F25 Final?
> Now my pr
Hi,
Finally someone seems that found the mystery with firewalld, we need
open on source port ! more details in [1], Adam can you make it happen
for F25 ? also we need test it .
Thanks,
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297235
--
Sérgio M. B.
On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 00:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 7/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161010.n.0):
>
> ID: 40461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
> URL: https:/
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
64 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-32eaf0c41e
redis-3.2.3-1.fc24
47 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0ef628998f
chicken-4.11.0-3.fc24
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161010.n.0):
ID: 40461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/40461
ID: 40483 Test: x86_64 universal su
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
387 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240
nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23
345 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe
miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23
318 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> U.S. rural areas? :-D
>
> I'm pretty rural, and even I have good internet. Maybe we need to
> redefine "rural" to be independent of physicality :-)
Yes it was sort of a ding on the state of affairs in the U.S. rather
than rural areas. U.S.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote:
>>an optical specific Live Workstation spin
>
> Sounds like the proper category: will not block a regular Fedora release,
> will not consume test resources for primary Fedora deliverables, and will
> provide a focus for those with some stake
Hi,
there is still the Anaconda problem of F25 Alpha in F25 Beta. Still not
possible to install on usb connected media.
Same Dracut error message as previously. Will it be possible to use usb
connected media in F25 Final?
Now my problem is only, that I can not take part in the testing of Beta, ex
Missing expected images:
Kde live x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 3/91 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161010.n.0):
ID: 40308 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/40308
ID: 4
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 15:46 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > >
On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
[...]
I guess
On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
>an optical specific Live Workstation spin
Sounds like the proper category: will not block a regular Fedora release,
will not consume test resources for primary Fedora deliverables, and will
provide a focus for those with some stake in optical media.
While lack of community to support an "optical
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:00:05PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Based on feedback from Ambassadors, DVD images may still be useful
> > giveaways in regions with less access to bandwidth. I'm not sure what
> > to do about that.
> U.S. rural areas? :-D
Possibly, although I think most people would
On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
[...]
I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0 source rpm and
give it a different name like li
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > [...]
> > I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0 source rpm and
> > give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build
On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
[...]
I guess the other thing you could do is grab the libvpx-1.5.0 source rpm and
give it a different name like libvpx-compat, build and install it then the
requirement of VirtualBox should be met without
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Hi testers,
> >
> > I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no
> > F25 version is available
> >
> > Anybody tried this and was successful?
> >
> > I'm exp
Hi,
In changelog of libvpx we can read :
- Upgrading:
This release is ABI incompatible with 1.5.0 due to a new 'color_range' enum
in vpx_image and some minor changes to the VP8_COMP structure.
The default key frame interval for VP9 has changed from 128 to .
source : https://chromium.googlesour
On 10/11/16 15:56, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no F25
> version is
> available
>
> Anybody tried this and was successful?
>
> I'm experiencing this error:
>
> sudo dnf install VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6_110634_fedora24-1.x8
On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi testers,
>
> I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no
> F25 version is available
>
> Anybody tried this and was successful?
>
> I'm experiencing this error:
>
> sudo dnf install VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6_1106
Hi testers,
I'm trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox in F25 because no
F25 version is available
Anybody tried this and was successful?
I'm experiencing this error:
sudo dnf install VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6_110634_fedora24-1.x86_64.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 3:04:28 ago on Tue
26 matches
Mail list logo
