Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F25_bugs#GNOME_Wayland_session_does_not_start_a_login_shell.2C_so_does_not_process_.bash_profile_or_.bashrc_etc.
I had a look... quite an interesting discussion. I need to
take it in in pieces ;-)
I agree that
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
132 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08
squid-3.5.23-1.fc24
125 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08
exim-4.87.1-1.fc24
88
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
125 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb
exim-4.87.1-1.fc25
24 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e
python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25
7
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Are you talking about ssh or terminal login sessions, or
graphical
> logins under Wayland?
Graphical logins under Kwin on X11. When I ctrl-alt-fx to
another virtual terminal (non-graphical) and log in (I just
tried it this very minute), it works as it is supposed to
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Is this from an application running from:
>
> * A desktop session? (Which one? And what display manager?)
A desktop session, Plasma/KDE, GDM display manager, kwin
window manager
> * A terminal window opened from within a desktop session?
(Which terminal
>
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 69/116 (x86_64), 20/23 (i386)
ID: 89704 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL:
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 17/116 (x86_64), 8/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 89575 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL:
OLD: Fedora-26-20170430.n.0
NEW: Fedora-26-20170501.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 21
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.78 MiB
Size of dropped packages:132.30 KiB
> "PG" == Peter Gueckel writes:
PG> For some reason, my setting in .bash_profile is no longer being
PG> honoured in Fedora 26! Why?
Is this from an application running from:
* A desktop session? (Which one? And what display manager?)
* A terminal window opened from
On 05/01/2017 09:42 AM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
For some reason, my setting in .bash_profile is no longer being
honoured in Fedora 26! Why?
Are you talking about ssh or terminal login sessions, or graphical
logins under Wayland? I suspect the latter, as Wayland sessions don't
(or didn't) run
In ~/.bash_profile, I have umask=022, since I want directories
(files) to have the permission 755 (644).
Until Fedora 25, this worked perfectly.
Now, in Fedora 26, directories (files) are created with the
permission 775 (664).
When I run umask, it returns 0002.
For some reason, my
11 matches
Mail list logo