Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-01 Thread Peter Gueckel
Peter Gueckel wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F25_bugs#GNOME_Wayland_session_does_not_start_a_login_shell.2C_so_does_not_process_.bash_profile_or_.bashrc_etc. I had a look... quite an interesting discussion. I need to take it in in pieces ;-) I agree that

Fedora 24 updates-testing report

2017-05-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 132 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08 squid-3.5.23-1.fc24 125 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08 exim-4.87.1-1.fc24 88

Fedora 25 updates-testing report

2017-05-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing: Age URL 125 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb exim-4.87.1-1.fc25 24 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25 7

Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-01 Thread Peter Gueckel
Gordon Messmer wrote: > Are you talking about ssh or terminal login sessions, or graphical > logins under Wayland? Graphical logins under Kwin on X11. When I ctrl-alt-fx to another virtual terminal (non-graphical) and log in (I just tried it this very minute), it works as it is supposed to

Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-01 Thread Peter Gueckel
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Is this from an application running from: > > * A desktop session? (Which one? And what display manager?) A desktop session, Plasma/KDE, GDM display manager, kwin window manager > * A terminal window opened from within a desktop session? (Which terminal >

Fedora Rawhide-20170501.n.0 compose check report

2017-05-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 69/116 (x86_64), 20/23 (i386) ID: 89704 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL:

Fedora 26-20170501.n.0 compose check report

2017-05-01 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 17/116 (x86_64), 8/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 89575 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL:

Fedora 26 compose report: 20170501.n.0 changes

2017-05-01 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-26-20170430.n.0 NEW: Fedora-26-20170501.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 21 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.78 MiB Size of dropped packages:132.30 KiB

Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-01 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "PG" == Peter Gueckel writes: PG> For some reason, my setting in .bash_profile is no longer being PG> honoured in Fedora 26! Why? Is this from an application running from: * A desktop session? (Which one? And what display manager?) * A terminal window opened from

Re: Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-01 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 05/01/2017 09:42 AM, Peter Gueckel wrote: For some reason, my setting in .bash_profile is no longer being honoured in Fedora 26! Why? Are you talking about ssh or terminal login sessions, or graphical logins under Wayland? I suspect the latter, as Wayland sessions don't (or didn't) run

Umask in Fedora 26 ?

2017-05-01 Thread Peter Gueckel
In ~/.bash_profile, I have umask=022, since I want directories (files) to have the permission 755 (644). Until Fedora 25, this worked perfectly. Now, in Fedora 26, directories (files) are created with the permission 775 (664). When I run umask, it returns 0002. For some reason, my