Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-13 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29. Dne pá 14. 9. 2018 8:03 uživatel Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > wrote: > >> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workst

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-13 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I > installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network > installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28, > the system takes a lo

Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-13 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28, the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I log in, it takes a long ti

Fedora Rawhide-20180913.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180912.n.0): ID: 279381 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279381 ID: 279384 Test: x86_6

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180913.n.0 changes

2018-09-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180912.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180913.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 53 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 371.45 KiB Size of dropped packages:0

F29-armfhp does tracer work?

2018-09-13 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I did the dnf update from testing-updates that updated ~130 rpms. I then installed tracer and ran it. It did report anything. Does it not work or is it that I installed tracer after the update? Perhaps tracer should be part of the base install? thanks _

Heads up: today's rawhide and F29 updates-testing break gnome-shell login

2018-09-13 Thread Kalev Lember
Hi all, It turns out mozjs60 60.2.0 (in F29 updates-testing and rawhide) silently broke ABI and that broke gjs that gnome-shell uses. I've rebuilt gjs; if you've already updated and can't log in, then gjs-1.54.0-3.fc29 and gjs-1.54.0-3.fc30 should help. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE

F29 and BZ 1627963

2018-09-13 Thread Ed Greshko
Hi, I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627963 against F28 and I've tested the latest kernel 4.18.7-200 from koji. It is still the case where the latest builds of the kernel breaks some mice.  The buttons work, but no cursor movement.  I've not been able to test this on F29

Re: F29-armhfp - updates-testing updates

2018-09-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:16 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Should I install updates from the updates-testing repo on my Cubieboard2 > Xfce setup at this time? > > Is there something there that I could check out? I don't see anything > there connected to what I am currently doing. But then I may