Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal > wrote: >> What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least >> selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29. > > Well - almost ;-) > > $ dnf list installed | grep -i selinu

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
> > Disabling selinux fixed it. I assume this is already in bugzilla. > Thanks everyone! > Hello, what do you mean by disabling SElinux? I do not recommend to disable it completely. Instead, set it to "permissive" mode. With this settings, SElinux will not be any obstacle to you, but it will still

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least > selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29. Well - almost ;-) $ dnf list installed | grep -i selinux container-selinux.noarch 2:2.71-2.git5721d74.fc29@fedora libsel

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 23:57 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal > > wrote: > > > What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least > > > selinux-policy-

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

2018-09-14 Thread Alessio Ciregia
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic* > operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on > what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found? FWIW, I never hit such problem. The on

Proposal to modify release criteria for fwraid

2018-09-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher
At yesterday's F29 Go/No-Go meeting, we discussed the blocker status of BZ #1628192 - Fedora 29 installation cannot see a firmware RAID device. While the blocker criteria clearly states that this should be a blocker for Beta, many of the people present at the meeting disagreed, for a variety of rea

Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 9/14/18 1:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28, the system takes a long time to display

errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
New f29-beta for armfhp.  Just ran dnf update and caught this go across the screen...   Running scriptlet: anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl    173/190 /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl) scriptlet faile

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180912.n.0 changes

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-29-20180911.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180912.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 103 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 90.43 MiB Size of dropped packages:134.08 KiB Si

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes: RM> New f29-beta for armfhp.  Just ran dnf update and caught this go RM> across the screen... RM> /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache RM> warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7hl) scriptlet failed, RM> exit status 1 Bizarr

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 9/14/18 2:43 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes: RM> New f29-beta for armfhp.  Just ran dnf update and caught this go RM> across the screen... RM> /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache RM> warning: %postun(anaconda-widgets-29.24.1-1.fc29.armv7h

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes: RM> Where would I put a 36K output file? Honestly I figured you would look at the output yourself to see if anything stands out. Though you redirected stdout and not stderr, and so the output you pasted showed the only error output by that command anyway,

Re: errors in dnf update

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 9/14/18 3:09 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "RM" == Robert Moskowitz writes: RM> Where would I put a 36K output file? Honestly I figured you would look at the output yourself to see if anything stands out. Though you redirected stdout and not stderr, and so the output you pasted showed

More F29-beta dnf update erros

2018-09-14 Thread Robert Moskowitz
dnf update Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:28 ago on Fri 14 Sep 2018 02:56:09 PM EDT. Dependencies resolved.  Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.fc29.armv7hl   - package bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.module_2123+73a9ef6f.armv7hl is disabled  Problem 2

Re: More F29-beta dnf update erros

2018-09-14 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 15:34 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > dnf update > Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:28 ago on Fri 14 Sep 2018 02:56:09 > PM EDT. > Dependencies resolved. > > Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package > bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.fc29.armv7hl >- pack

Fedora 29-20180912.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 279984 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279984 ID: 279991 Test: i386

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180914.n.0 changes

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180913.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180914.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 121 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.20 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora Rawhide-20180914.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-14 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180913.n.0): ID: 280334 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/280334 ID: 28035