Hope you are right!
- On Jun 10, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 02:13:05PM -0400, ergodic wrote:
>> Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
>> not political forums.
>
> It seems that there's been more offtopic p
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 02:13:05PM -0400, ergodic wrote:
> Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
> not political forums.
It seems that there's been more offtopic posting about it being off topic,
then there are posts about the post. (Hrrm, lost myself there).
I think
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 14:13 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
> not political forums.
They also have mailing lists that anyone can post to. Look, someone
posted something to a mailing list that they shouldn't have. It is not
the end of the
Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
not political forums.
- On Jun 10, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 13:17 -0400, ergodic wrote:
>> Is this a high jack?
>
> It's a mailing list post to an open list
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 13:17 -0400, ergodic wrote:
> Is this a high jack?
It's a mailing list post to an open list by a member of that list. It
is not practical for us to moderate every post to every list, we don't
have the resources for that (and it'd slow everything down hugely even
if we did).
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 12:55 PM Eric Blake wrote:
>
> I gave it a shot, but as it is a wiki, feel free to improve my attempt:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#off-topic
>
I tweaked it a little bit, but your approach was pretty good.
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Pr
Is this a high jack? Hope that Fedora and Red Hat are not becoming political
organizations nows.
Utterly disgusting! Keep politics out.
To Temlakos and George R Goffe: I completely oppose the expressed views.
- On Jun 9, 2019, at 9:47 PM, Temlakos wrote:
> On 6/9/19 6:09 PM, Jonathan Ca
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:40:20 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> In a nutshell...yes.
>
> This is what https://pagure.io/rpmdeplint is for, but it's a very hard
> problem to actually fully solve, and there are enough problems with
> false negatives that we've never been in a position to make it a
> g
On 6/10/19 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Does this post violate some kind of guideline, or does it not?
>
> Oddly enough, I don't think it actually does, unless you bend the
> guidelines quite a lot, because...
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
> ...unless I'm m
On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 17:54 -0700, stan via test wrote:
> I had occasion to install many packages from f31 today. The large
> majority of them installed successfully, but the packages in the
> attached file didn't. There are 411 of them, which is few for as many
> packages as there are in Fedora.
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 03:54 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Thanks , I don't have rawhide installed
>
> for example : - nothing provides jchardet needed by eclipse-m2e-core-
> 1.11.0-1.fc31.noarch
>
> and jchardet was retired on 2019-04-01 [1] which is bad
>
> [1]
> https://src.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 21:47 -0400, Temlakos wrote:
>
> To the administrators of the Fedora Project Test List:
>
> Would one of you tell me please,
>
> what, in the names of Linus Torvalds and Richard Stallman,
>
> does the likelihood of the death or resignation of an Associate Justice
> of the
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
7 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/146 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID
13 matches
Mail list logo
