No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 45 required tests failed, 11 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.c
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and
> this got accepted as a release blocker:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388
Summary: This bug was introduced and discovered in linux-next, it
starte
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:48 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks!
> >
> > So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and
> > this got accepted as a release blocker:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:48 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson
> > So...what should we do? Here are the options as I see 'em:
> >
> > 1. Keep supporting btrfs
> > 2. Just modify the criterion with a btrfs exception, even if it's weird
> > 3. Rewrite the cri
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Hey folks!
>
> So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and
> this got accepted as a release blocker:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388
>
> The bug was fixed, so that's fine, but along the way,
Hey folks!
So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and
this got accepted as a release blocker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388
The bug was fixed, so that's fine, but along the way, Laura said this:
"I'm strongly against anything with btrfs being a bl
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 10:15 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> On 8/22/19 10:46 PM, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > No missing expected images.
> >
> > Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
> >
> > ID: 434613 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
> > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On 8/22/19 10:46 PM, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
>
> ID: 434613Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/434613
>
> Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
>
C
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190822.n.0):
ID: 434660 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/434660
ID: 434663 Test: x86_64 Wo
OLD: Fedora-31-20190822.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190823.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 75
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 158.44 MiB
Size of dropped packages:1.89 MiB
10 matches
Mail list logo