No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
I have about 12 man-hours of usage, with my current install.
If I walk away from the computer, and come back later, it is locked up and
I have to shut off power-supply.
This problem has existed since I first installed it as Version 32 two weeks
ago.
I hope you all keep a Xfce, but I would not kn
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
19 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 75/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedo
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 25/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200219.n.0):
ID: 524147 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/524147
ID: 524150 Test: x86_64 Workstation-
OLD: Fedora-32-20200219.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200220.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 19
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 18.24 KiB
Size of dropped packages:101.35 KiB
On Thu, 2020-02-20 at 06:46 +, George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This message looks wrong to me. Of course there could be something I don't
> understand. :-)
>
> Notice the text after "requires" below. Is there a syntax error in the
> "requires" part of the pkg?
No, that's a normal
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 7:09 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> One tiny nit: the Beta and Final release criteria aren't quite
> *separate*, they're *cumulative*. At Beta, the Basic+Beta criteria
> apply. At Final, the Basic+Beta+Final criteria apply.
>
The article freeze hasn't started yet, so I fixed
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200218.0):
ID: 524036 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/524036
ID: 524037 Te
Den 2020-02-19 kl. 21:29, skrev Steven A. Falco:
> On 2/19/20 2:06 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> Hi QA team,
>>
>> In the Fedora Magazine meeting this morning, we were running a little
>> low on articles. I though "what's something I can write about
>> quickly?" and I came up with an overview of how we
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
Hey All,
As we speak, GNOME test day is underway for Fedora 32 release cycle
and we have some interesting changes you can help us test, apart from
the regular things in the test days app[0]
The Test Day Candidate nominated is [1] and the major things to look
for testing apart from regular are tal
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
12 matches
Mail list logo
