Oops, I meant, "n.0," not "n.2"
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, 11:28 PM David wrote:
> Could someone please explain what compose task or build procedures are
> performed while creating this "n.1" version, that are different from "n.2" ?
>
> Is the compose building the same identical system?
>
> I think I
Could someone please explain what compose task or build procedures are
performed while creating this "n.1" version, that are different from "n.2" ?
Is the compose building the same identical system?
I think I read somewhere that this procedure has different consequences or
results each time you
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 23/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200306.n.0):
ID: 535275 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/535275
Old failures (same test
OLD: Fedora-32-20200306.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200306.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Lukas,
Welcome.
I am a fan of Rawhide.I do not believe any distro offers something
equivalent to Rawhide.
One other distro OpenSUSE offers Tumbleweed, however, there is a huge
difference.
However, the trick seems to first get a good iso of Rawhide, which is not
easy.I would only use
This is something that has been coming for quite a while now
and while it was discussed among QA and Infra, there hasn't been
enough communication with the rest of Fedora. For that, I apologize.
Taskotron has been in maintenance-only mode for a couple of years now
pending a replacement of some
Hi,
My name is Łukasz, but to make things easier, I often write Lukas. I live in
Poland with my son and my fiancee. I'm working in e-commerce but my passions
are computers, software, programming, Linux systems and management. I'm using
Fedora 31 as my daily driver. I also have computers with
> I can't find the ticket where I went nuts about this before any more,
> but I've been saying it for a while :P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435423
You can blame me, because I said I would work on fixing it,
then never did. ;(
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi David,
Thanks for these reports. I'm going to start testing XFCE soon (right now
I'm using KDE), and these reports are very useful to me. So please, keep
them coming.
Sad to hear about your ex, hope things get better soon. Your patience is
admirable.
Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 09:02 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> f32-backgrounds is available for testing on
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca
>
> For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv,
> tv-wider folders in favour of
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > Hello team,
> > >
> > > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca
> > >
> > > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv,
> > >
> > Hello team,
> >
> > f32-backgrounds is available for testing on
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca
> >
> > For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv,
> > tv-wider folders in favour of a single wallpapers (aside the time of day
> >
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 09:02 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> f32-backgrounds is available for testing on
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca
>
> For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv,
> tv-wider folders in favour of
Hello team,
f32-backgrounds is available for testing on
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-ed62604eca
For the Design team, new change is the drop of standard, normalish, tv,
tv-wider folders in favour of a single wallpapers (aside the time of day
theme) using system settings
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 26/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200305.n.0):
ID: 534831 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/534831
ID: 534872 Test: x86_64
OLD: Fedora-32-20200305.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200306.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
My install of Rawhide Xfce is still going strong.I have at least
20 man-hours on hardware of usage. I have the newest kernel
now, and I think the newest systemd, and wine, and a bunch of perl
stuff that I have no idea what that is.
The good news, is I have a new internet provider and
18 matches
Mail list logo
