On 2020-03-08 14:04, David wrote:
> When Fedora 32 branches off Rawhide, does anything happen to the most
> popular unofficial third-party repo ?
Please try not to obfuscate.
What is the name of the repo you are talking about?
>
> Does this forum allow for such heresy to talk about the specific
When Fedora 32 branches off Rawhide, does anything happen to the most
popular unofficial third-party repo ?
Does it branch off too ? I assume that process takes several days or
weeks.
Right ?
Anyways, from what I can tell that repo works good now in Rawhide.I
think
I removed it for a week
I have scoured the web and my problem is or has been experienced by
hundreds of Fedora users for many years, however, they were not using
Rawhide.
The crazy Broadcom ( BCM43228 ) problem is what I am referring to.
On a related note,
I installed an application from the repository called "wifi rad
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
18 of 43 required tests failed, 9 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 80/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedo
On 2020-03-08 08:45, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/7/20 3:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-03-08 06:19, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> On 3/7/20 1:57 PM, David wrote:
I am probably asking on the wrong listserve, but this is the only one
I subscribe to.
>>>
>>> The "users" mailing list would be a m
The following Fedora 30 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
109 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-71b2273a9f
libarchive-3.3.3-7.fc30
43 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cc26574961
chromium-79.0.3945.130-1.fc30
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.or
On 3/7/20 3:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-03-08 06:19, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/7/20 1:57 PM, David wrote:
I am probably asking on the wrong listserve, but this is the only one
I subscribe to.
The "users" mailing list would be a much better place for getting help with
this kind of question
On 2020-03-08 06:19, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 3/7/20 1:57 PM, David wrote:
>> I am probably asking on the wrong listserve, but this is the only one
>> I subscribe to.
>
> The "users" mailing list would be a much better place for getting help with
> this kind of question.
But, if memory serves me,
Thank you.
I have akmod-wl and wpa_supplicant and broadcomm-wl and kernel-header and
kernel-modulues
and kernel-devel, kernel-core, kernel-modules-extras, and both free and
non-free of the unofficial
third-party repo.
My recollection was, that there was a well-known developer who had a hack
or so
On 3/7/20 1:57 PM, David wrote:
I am probably asking on the wrong listserve, but this is the only one
I subscribe to.
The "users" mailing list would be a much better place for getting help
with this kind of question.
But I can not for the life of me, figure out how to get wi-fi to work in
F
Hi David, you likely need akmod-wl as well as well as kernel development
headers
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 5:05 PM David wrote:
> I am probably asking on the wrong listserve, but this is the only one
> I subscribe to.
>
> I have never used wi-fi in Fedora.I have normally had access to a
> Ether
I am probably asking on the wrong listserve, but this is the only one
I subscribe to.
I have never used wi-fi in Fedora.I have normally had access to a
Ethernet
and all my previous attempts at wi-fi in Fedora have failed.
So today, I purchased a router, and connected it to my cable-modem and
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200305.0):
ID: 536139 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 18/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200306.n.1):
ID: 536042 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/536042
ID: 536094 Test: x86_64 universal
OLD: Fedora-32-20200306.n.1
NEW: Fedora-32-20200307.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 47
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:183.05 MiB
Size of
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
Lukas,
Welcome.
I am a fan of Rawhide.I do not believe any distro offers something
equivalent to Rawhide.
One other distro OpenSUSE offers Tumbleweed, however, there is a huge
difference.
Hi David,
Thanks for the answer.
I have Fedora Rawhide installed on VM. I haven't run it for a
On Sat, 2020-03-07 at 00:03 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> formally the 'n' is a 'compose type suffix' indicating that the
> 'compose type' for this compose is 'nightly'; the digit in question
> that comes after the compose type suffix is called the 'respin'.
Sorry, should've mentioned - 'nigh
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 23:28 -0600, David wrote:
> Could someone please explain what compose task or build procedures are
> performed while creating this "n.1" version, that are different from "n.2" ?
>
> Is the compose building the same identical system?
>
> I think I read somewhere that this pro
20 matches
Mail list logo
