It is possible to have the PV encrypted and the LVs not encrypted. In
the installer, you pick the Advanced Custom (blivet) method for
configuring the hard drive. Create a /boot filesystem, then give the
rest to the physical volume and set the encrypt flag on that. Create a
volume group on it
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:56 PM Dario Lesca wrote:
>
> I have try to install a Fedora 32 Beta on a existent previous Fedora 31
> system using an encrypted LVM
>
> Something is wrong
>
> I have not format the /home LV volume and format only the other swap, / and
> /var old LV volume.
>
> The setu
I could possibly be doing something wrong, but it shouldn't crash the
entire installer. I went into the blivet disk partitioning tool and
tried to create a volume group. I put in a name, then checked the
encrypt box. I entered a password in both fields then clicked ok. An
error box pops up
On 3/22/20 1:50 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 13.07 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
You were able to configure it this way using the F31 installer?
I have install a fresh system with Fedora 31, but when I boot the
system, after 5 minutes the system freeze and I cannot u
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 13.07 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> This should probably only be on the test@ list for now. Please trim
> future replies.
Ok, I write here.
> You're overwriting an existing install using the current partitions,
> not upgrading it?
Yes, not upgrading, I want kee
This should probably only be on the test@ list for now. Please trim
future replies.
On 3/22/20 12:55 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
I have try to install a Fedora 32 Beta on a existent previous Fedora 31
system using an encrypted LVM
You're overwriting an existing install using the current partition
I have try to install a Fedora 32 Beta on a existent previous Fedora 31
system using an encrypted LVM
Something is wrong
I have not format the /home LV volume and format only the other swap, /
and /var old LV volume.
The setup keeps the original Encrypted LVM partition but encrypt also
the swap,
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200321.0):
ID: 553328 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
OLD: Fedora-32-20200321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 23.07 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200321.n.0):
ID: 553182 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/553182
ID: 553194 Test: x86_64 Workstation
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
System load changed from 0.30 to 0.13
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/552382#downloads
Cur
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 9/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200321.n.0):
ID: 552973 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fed
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200321.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200322.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 14
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 88
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.48 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
14 matches
Mail list logo