Ok, I have installed on my hard drive the Games spin of Fedora 32.
I did the "dnf update" and now, tried trackballs and a report was generated: oh
well, online retrace failed, and I just asked to retrace locally,
downloading almost 1 Gb right now to do so.__
://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-32-20200323.n.0/compose/Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-86_64-32-20200323.n.0.iso
written on a USB key.
I did try:
sleep 10m &
kill -SIGSEGV $!
as suggested on: https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tools/abrt/about.html
but no program seems to launc
Hi folks!
We have a proposed F32 blocker bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809717
which reports issues with 4K displays when using X11 (not Wayland).
Initial indications suggest this may be specific to AMD graphics
adapters: the reporter has an AMD adapter, and a couple of our te
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 3/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200322.n.0):
ID: 554126 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fed
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200323.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 11
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 58
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.70 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200322.n.0):
ID: 554333 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/554333
ID: 554338 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200322.1):
ID: 554772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproje
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
System load changed from 0.13 to 0.25
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/553088#downloads
Cur
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 1:16 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:04 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > I think I understand what you want to do: You want a disk partition ->
> > LUKS -> LVM PV -> LVM VG, and then /, /var, /home, swap to be XFS
> > formatted LVs.
> >
> > I'm not cert
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso
Most every installation, when using custom partitioning (but I have
seen it with default, it might just be easier to reproduce with
custom), when I click to accept it, there is a pause before it goes
back to the hub (main menu) and GNOME complains bri
OLD: Fedora-32-20200322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200323.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 4
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:04 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I think I understand what you want to do: You want a disk partition ->
> LUKS -> LVM PV -> LVM VG, and then /, /var, /home, swap to be XFS
> formatted LVs.
>
> I'm not certain it's actually possible to do this,
OK, it is possible to do this
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received no
> further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria&type=revision&diff=568145&
On 3/23/20 2:46 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 23.36 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
It is possible to have the PV encrypted and the LVs not encrypted. In
the installer, you pick the Advanced Custom (blivet) method for
configuring the hard drive. Create a /boot filesystem
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
Il giorno lun, 23/03/2020 alle 11.24 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> The problem is bliver-gui, not Anaconda.
>
> If you try run "sudo bliver-gui" you get the same error.
I have fill a bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816098
>
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 31 W
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 17.58 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> I could possibly be doing something wrong,
The problem is bliver-gui, not Anaconda.
If you try run "sudo bliver-gui" you get the same error.
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 31 Workstation)
__
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 17.42 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> To make sure I understand, you tried to install with F31.
I have try Fedora 31 and it work as expected: encrypt VG partition and
not encrypt LV
The flag "Encrypt" external to VG property is gray and not blue like
F32
Seem tha
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 23.04 -0600, Chris Murphy ha scritto:
> I'm not certain it's actually possible to do this, except maybe
> inAdvanced partitioning. Here's why.
IMHO:
double encryption must be removed.
If the VG is encrypted, it is not necessary to also encrypt the LVs
--
Dario Le
Il giorno dom, 22/03/2020 alle 23.36 -0700, Samuel Sieb ha scritto:
> It is possible to have the PV encrypted and the LVs not
> encrypted. In the installer, you pick the Advanced Custom (blivet)
> method for configuring the hard drive. Create a /boot filesystem,
> then give the rest to the physic
21 matches
Mail list logo
