No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 15:35 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 32 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 12:59 -0500, David wrote:
> For your information,
>
> Flathub, is still on the old version, 92.4, as far as I can tell.
>
> Fedora flatpak project has 1.0 beta 2 version.
>
> Rawhide has the new 1.0 rc1 and I just now installed it natively. The
> dependencies
> appear t
Hey Testers!
As many of you know the Fedora 32 cycle is approaching a Final Freeze,
Fedora IoT and QA Team are hosting Fedora 32 IoT Test Day[0], which
is under way and you can start landing your first Fedora QA
contribution by participating in the Fedora IoT Test Day.
The steps are simple and ou
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200413.0):
ID: 577007 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/577007
Soft failed openQA tests
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 21:20 +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 20:14, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > So, during Fedora 32 Final blocker review, a bug relating to "user
> > switching" came up for review:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817708
>
Missing expected images:
Soas live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 5/35 (x86_64)
ID: 571959 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/571959
ID: 571976 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fe
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (arm)
ID: 576450 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/576450
Soft failed openQA tests: 21/171 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200413.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200414.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 76
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.25 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi folks!
So, during Fedora 32 Final blocker review, a bug relating to "user
switching" came up for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817708
I dug into the question of whether we have tended to consider the "log
in / log out / shut down / reboot" criterion as covering user
swi
For your information,
Flathub, is still on the old version, 92.4, as far as I can tell.
Fedora flatpak project has 1.0 beta 2 version.
Rawhide has the new 1.0 rc1 and I just now installed it natively. The
dependencies
appear to all be the same as in the Version 32 directory, except for
"grap
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200413.0):
ID: 576549 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/576549
Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64)
Installed system c
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 02:14:03AM -0500, David wrote:
> Is it correct to say Rawhide updated today from version 33-0.3 to
> 33-0.4, and what does that mean ?
Rawhide is unversioned, so that's not correct. The fedora-release package
version just indicates what OS # it will become.
The package re
OLD: Fedora-32-20200413.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200414.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 8
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
Is it correct to say Rawhide updated today from version 33-0.3 to
33-0.4, and what does that mean ?
Or does that update just mean the repo was renamed or renumbered,
or something like that ?
Is 33.-0.4 noticeably better than 33-0.3, or are the tiny incremental
improvements and regressions nearly
17 matches
Mail list logo
