Correction
htop is idling really low. 0.1 % on all four cores ( fluctuates
between 0.0 and 2.0, with a spike of 3.2
sometimes)
with memory at 847 MB ( Gnome )
The numbers obviously go up when Firefox is running, but YouTube really
sent the numbers
higher than what I think I normally see.
This is just about my install and today's update.
htop seems a little higher than usual.
Goodbye to the crusty old 5.7.0-rc0 kernel. Shouldn't
we all toast with our favorite beverage, when the no-longer-needed kernels
are erased? Mine is cold ginger beer and my favorite brand
is Fentim
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:45 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-04-13/fedora-qa.2020-04-13-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
The following Fedora 30 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-da7dcee2ec
wireshark-3.2.3-1.fc30
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2b53cff132
thunderbird-68.7.0-1.fc30
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:56 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> I think this:
> "If the release is declared no-go, the bug loses last minute status."
> should be part of our policy. I considered it obvious, but I'm sure some
> people (/me looking at Frantisek) would argue. Let's put it there.
>
I am agains
Since we were No-Go yesterday, we get to do this (at least) one more time!
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. f32-backgrounds — final f32-backgrounds version isn't in stable
repo — MODIFIED
ACTION: Maintainer to fix Supplements dependencies
2. python-blive
On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 14:02 -0500, David wrote:
> Could someone explain what is the difference here ?
>
> I think I read that even when building or compiling a new compose from the
> same exact ingredients, that you do not always get the same result.
>
> Is that what the point of this new compose
Could someone explain what is the difference here ?
I think I read that even when building or compiling a new compose from the
same exact ingredients, that you do not always get the same result.
Is that what the point of this new compose is ?
Or is it just a routine procedure, to show the daily
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200416.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200417.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 102
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 629.75 KiB
Size of dropped packages
OLD: Fedora-32-20200416.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200417.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:56 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> I think this:
> "If the release is declared no-go, the bug loses last minute status."
> should be part of our policy. I considered it obvious, but I'm sure some
> people (/me looking at Frantisek) would argue. Let's put it there.
>
> The prop
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 11:07 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> We learned in today's Go/No-Go meeting that the late blocker
> exception[1] has an edge case when the release slips. Currently, it
> suggests[2] that the bug becomes a blocker for the next milestone. In
> the case of a Final wallpaper bug, that
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default_upload:
System load changed from 0.14 to 0.32
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/578630#downloads
Cur
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 5:42 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> Yes, the testcase suggests crond, but I suggested chronyd. I have had
> trouble in the past trying to use crond on some systems (cloud, I think,
> although it was a long time ago). However, I have never had an issue using
> chronyd, and it ha
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:48 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> I think there are cases where each works better, there's no harm in
> supporting both.
>
So, I have hijacked Geoff's thread, because I didn't expect there to be a
discussion about it (or more than 5 extra minutes of work). Sorry about
tha
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 5:50 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> My use case is slightly different. I like to be able to log into a
> basic user configuration to test something, without logging out of my
> current session. That second desktop might even be running Gnome rather
> than KDE. Would that
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
18 matches
Mail list logo
