Fedora-Cloud-33-20201120.0 compose check report

2020-11-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201119.0): ID: 726218 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Fedora 31 updates-testing report

2020-11-19 Thread updates
The following Fedora 31 Security updates need testing: Age URL 62 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c5ec22e14f libuv-1.39.0-1.fc31 nodejs-12.18.4-1.fc31 19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bf41fcdeba libntlm-1.6-1.fc31 14

Re: libcap-ng update coming to rawhide

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 14:32 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday, November 12, 2020 2:45:41 PM EST Steve Grubb wrote: > > A new version of libcap-ng is going to be released next week. Normally this > >  isn't newsworthy, nor is this a soname version bump. But it is important > > to let the

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 14:41 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > People often add a hyperlink to the criterion in question (not using Adam's > anchors, just ToC links, but that's fine) to a Bugzilla comment. At least I > do it almost always (when I know which criterion to use, sometimes I > don't). But

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 14:02 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > Do you mean the list of trackers - BetaBlocker, FinalBlocker, BetaFE, > > > FinalFE, 0Day, PreviousRelease? I found them quite easy to remember, once > > > you vote in a few tickets. > > > > It's rather harder to keep them straight if

Fedora-IoT-34-20201119.0 compose check report

2020-11-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201118.0): ID: 725582 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/725582 ID: 725594 Test: x86_64

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Kamil Paral
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > We could add plumbing to update the mentioned data, but it's a lot of > work > > and I'm concerned about reliability. The envision workflow was that you > > visit the ticket through blockerbugs web app, and so you already know > most > > of

Fedora-Rawhide-20201119.n.0 compose check report

2020-11-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 17/177 (x86_64), 21/115 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 1:46 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:57 AM Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> >> * Using Magic Text for voting and admin is awkward and error-prone. >> Better UI for this would be really helpful. In addition, the state >> isn't

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:20 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 20:29 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > > * Using Magic Text for voting and admin is awkward and error-prone. > > > Better UI for this would be really helpful. > > > > > > I'm not sure how it can be improved. Do you

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:57 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > * Using Magic Text for voting and admin is awkward and error-prone. > Better UI for this would be really helpful. In addition, the state > isn't automatically updated when you vote or mark a decision, so I > always find myself manually

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:00 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:30 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:25 PM Chris Murphy > wrote: > >> > >> I often had to click the 'how to vote' link in a separate tab to > copy/paste the proper tag. It'd be nice if the list

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

2020-11-19 Thread Kamil Paral
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 8:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:33 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > Alright, that's a similar feedback to Chris'. Could you specify what > exactly did you not remember? The tracker names (FinalBlocker, FinalFE, > etc)? Their CamelCase format (hint:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201119.n.0 changes

2020-11-19 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201118.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201119.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 22 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 72 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 224.82 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201119.0 compose check report

2020-11-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64), 7/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201119.0 compose check report

2020-11-19 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201118.0): ID: 725151 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: