No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210222.0):
ID: 786468 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:17:59PM -0600, David wrote:
> At this present state of Fedora 34 and Rawhide,
>
> I see almost the same exact packages getting the same bumps in version
> numbers, with only
> the suffix "fc34" and fc35" being the difference.
>
> 1 )Does this just mean that the ide
At this present state of Fedora 34 and Rawhide,
I see almost the same exact packages getting the same bumps in version
numbers, with only
the suffix "fc34" and fc35" being the difference.
1 )Does this just mean that the identical packages are stored on the
server in a different directory ?
On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 07:51 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> On 2/21/21 16:18, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 6:18 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm sitting here thinking about F34 Beta being just two days away and
> > > what I have observed in my te
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 1:39 AM George R Goffe wrote:
> Feb 21 18:55:38 fc35 kernel: BTRFS warning (device sda8): csum failed root
> 256 ino 257 off 0 csum 0xe05b8b2e expected csum 0xc90f1f63 mirror 1
> Feb 21 18:55:38 fc35 kernel: BTRFS error (device sda8): bdev /dev/sda8 errs:
> wr 0, rd 0, f
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210220.0):
ID: 786325 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786325
ID: 786330 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 22/183 (x86_64), 19/124 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210221.n.0):
ID: 785960 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785960
ID: 785963 Test
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 1:45 PM Pat Kelly wrote:
> A long delay on a shutdown or restart must be a blocker criterion. It's an
> excuse for folks to say "Fedora is slow". The pundits will say it's broken.
> Also it's very annoying especially when you're working on software or doing
> testing.
>
>
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0):
ID: 786236 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786236
ID: 78
OLD: Fedora-34-20210221.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210222.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 46
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 2/21/21 16:18, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 6:18 AM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
I'm sitting here thinking about F34 Beta being just two days away and
what I have observed in my testing. I must admit being more than a
little concerned.
Beta freeze starts Tue 2021-02-23. B
I wholeheartedly agree with the proposal this needs to be approved. I
just added my encouragements to the discussion. We must not let the
approval for this get stalled. The words can be tweaked later if it
turns out to be necessary.
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
On 2
> You can set up usb passthrough through virt-manager or VirtualBox. After
> you do that, the guest gains complete control of that usb device and it
> should work/behave like it wasn't even in a vm.
>
> You can get there through "Show virtual hardware details", "Add Hardware",
> "USB Host Device",
A long delay on a shutdown or restart must be a blocker criterion. It's an
excuse for folks to say "Fedora is slow". The pundits will say it's broken.
Also it's very annoying especially when you're working on software or doing
testing.
Please don't let this go undone because of debates over ver
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/183 (x86_64), 11/124 (aarch64)
New failures (sa
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210221.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210222.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 60.31 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:43 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Some of them can be run in a VM for sure, but you might run into unknown
> waters when it comes to using USB external sound cards and some kind of
> application sound routing, because you might not be able to simulate that
> in the VM, where
Some of them can be run in a VM for sure, but you might run into unknown
waters when it comes to using USB external sound cards and some kind of
application sound routing, because you might not be able to simulate that
in the VM, where the sound device is just a bridge to the real one on the
hardwa
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210221.0):
ID: 785443 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 10:18 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:24 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
> >
> > If Gnome is still hanging for 2 minutes on reboot [1] then I think we
> may want to consider that a blocking bug for F34. I can at least confirm
> that this bug is still affecting R
Chris,
I tried some commands and captured what /var/log/message "said" about each. I'm
somewhat alarmed that these errors somehow crept into the image. There were NO
outages or interruptions during the conversion. smartctl doesn't "say" anything
about drive problems either... hence the alarm.
21 matches
Mail list logo
