On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 4:05 PM George R Goffe via test
wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> The inode is NOT the same one. I tried a sqlite dump | restore operation but
> it didn't work...
>
> With your journalctl -f and trying dnf history, dnf reported I/O errors but
> no kernel or /var/log/messages appeared
Chris,
The inode is NOT the same one. I tried a sqlite dump | restore operation but it
didn't work...
With your journalctl -f and trying dnf history, dnf reported I/O errors but no
kernel or /var/log/messages appeared to contain I/O error messages.
fc35-bash 5.1 /var/lib/dnf# sqlite3 history.s
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210313.0):
ID: 814567 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/814567
ID: 814576 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd
download from
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/34_Beta-1.2/Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-34_Beta-1.2.iso,
run in vmware, in login screen, cannot login desktop. Circle requires me to
log on
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fed
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210313.0):
ID: 814480 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/814480
Ol
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/187 (x86_64), 15/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210313.n.0):
ID: 814190 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/814190
ID: 814195 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso de
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/187 (x86_64), 26/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed i
In regard to testing F34 WS Beta candidate 1.2:
I was glad to see the white screen sad face gone. Everything went fine
through testing the SA basics. I did see the continuing SELinux bugs,
but I figure those are being worked on.
I set up a second user and logged the account in using Gnome-xor
In the wake of the BZ 1924808[1] discussion in Thursday's Go/No-Go
meeting[2], I am proposing an addition to the Basic Release
Criteria[3]. This would go into Post-Install Requirements -> Expected
installed system boot behavior -> First boot utilities (appended after
the existing sentence):
> If a
OLD: Fedora-34-20210313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210313.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210314.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 59
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 326.13 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210313.0):
ID: 813657 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
12 matches
Mail list logo