On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 10:13 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/11/13 10:03, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 06:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> I see Does that then imply the problem is, or has been,
> >> introduced by the packaging of LibreOffice for Fedora?
> > Have you filed a bu
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 21:39 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Strange... here it is called libreoffice-ure, and should not get updated by
> any OOo stuff. Perhaps there is something eles that uses it?
Both Fedora openoffice.org and the original upstream openoffice.org
ended up with a package call
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 10:49 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the todays F16 updates (updating a lot of libreoffice modules too)
> I have problems to print pages of libreoffice documents having A4
> landscape layout: The pages are printed in portrait layout so the left
> and right part
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 10:49 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the todays F16 updates (updating a lot of libreoffice modules too)
Do you know updates from what ?, i.e. do you have a data point as to
when it worked ? Is this a F15 to F16 update, or an earlier F16 to
current F16 update ?
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 20:21 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings All:
>
>
> I am having problems with installing libreoffice... Here is what I
> get from yum...
Yeah, we need to rebuilt for the latest hunspell, we're blocked on a few
little build glitches at the moment. Will be cleared soon eno
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:01 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone explain the difference between /usr/bin/openoffice.org-1.9,
> /usr/bin/openoffice.org-2.0 and /usr/bin/openoffice.org in F14?
There's no difference, "1.9" and "2.0" were basically accidentally
versioned back in the day
