Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 Available Now!

2024-03-20 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:41:48 + (UTC) rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: >

Re: Fwd: [Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.5 Available Now!

2023-04-13 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:53:41 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 11:48 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > We are closing in on the Go/NoGo tonight and We would like to have as much > > feedback as possible on this new 1.5 RC. > > Also, there is a potential

Re: Troubleshooting live boot on an Intel DH87RL

2022-12-21 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 15:02:04 -0600 Brandon Nielsen via test wrote: > Finally got a chance to install Fedora 37 on most of the machines I have > around here. Interestingly I cannot get Fedora 37 Workstation Live to > boot in UEFI mode on a desktop with an Intel DH87RL motherboard. What >

Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too.

2022-07-10 Thread Dan Horák
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 00:28:07 + (UTC) George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having trouble with dnf and the 5.19 kernel. > > I have tried to exclude the 5.19 kernel on this system (FC37) because 1) > Virtual box doesn't seem to support it yet, 2) the system gets stuck during >

Re: Fedora35 missing package : pandoc-citeproc

2021-10-01 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:36:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2021-09-30 11:44 a.m., Nicolas Mendiboure via test wrote: > > Missing binary package pandoc-citeproc on Fedora 35 repo. > > I don't see why it's not there, but you can get the package from >

Re: Mystery empty file

2019-06-06 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:45:23 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 11:15 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:49 AM Richard Ryniker > > wrote: > > > I think you will find the file is not truly empty. /sys is not > > > an actual file system, merely an interface

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:41:59 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this

Re: Strange situation with Wine on Fedora 27

2017-07-12 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:12:07 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:27:34 + (UTC), Thomas Goffin wrote: > > > Hello, I'm just trying to install the Wine via dnf and get: > > # dnf install wine ... Error: Transaction check error: > >   file

Re: Package caching

2017-03-01 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:29:33 + Russel Winder wrote: > Debian has the approx system for package caching. This is just a proxy > for caching actually demanded packages. It does mean though that I > only download once and can upgrade 5 machines. Since Internet is still >

Re: Testing idea: kernel 4.7 for Fedora 23 / Fedora 24

2016-08-31 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:59:49 -0400 Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > tried F23, no kernel 4.7. > see: same for F-24, pushes are in progress now ... Dan -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: wpa_supplicant - Koji Buildsystem - No search results

2014-10-07 Thread Dan Horák
On Tue, 7 Oct 2014 20:31:22 +0200 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:27 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?terms=wpa_supplicanttype=packagematch=glob Seems to be caused by the _ try using a wildcard instead i.e

Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?

2013-12-06 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:53:09 +0100 Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote: On 12/06/2013 10:45 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 10:41 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi all, anybody sees this too if including the updates-testing repo to yum update: sudo yum

Re: F20: Updates-testing mirrors inoperable?

2013-12-06 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 06 Dec 2013 02:12:48 -0800 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 11:10 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: Hi Igor, thank you, did help :-) are you sure this is a problem in yum itself and not in the mirror infrastructure? If downgrading yum helps

Re: Moving away from reporting to RH bugzilla and adopting pure upstream reporting mantra.

2013-09-24 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:07:04 -0400 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Jan Wildeboer (jwild...@redhat.com) said: How will you track blocker bugs? How can we see a global view of all open bugs? Aggregate from X upstream bug report systems? Which not all are Bugzilla? How can

Re: F18: Why does modprobe ipv6 not load the module ipv6?

2012-12-14 Thread Dan Horák
Joachim Backes píše v Pá 14. 12. 2012 v 10:47 +0100: Hi F18 testers, It seems I'm doing something wrong: 1. lsmod |grep ipv6 : no module ipv6 found. Then 2. modprobe ipv6 reports no error, but ipv6 does not seem to be loaded: same result as in 1. There is no ipv6 listed in

Re: F18: Why does modprobe ipv6 not load the module ipv6?

2012-12-14 Thread Dan Horák
Joachim Backes píše v Pá 14. 12. 2012 v 13:18 +0100: On 12/14/2012 11:36 AM, Dan Horák wrote: Joachim Backes píše v Pá 14. 12. 2012 v 10:47 +0100: Hi F18 testers, It seems I'm doing something wrong: 1. lsmod |grep ipv6 : no module ipv6 found. Then 2. modprobe ipv6 reports no error

Re: rpmbuild --target=i686 on x86_64 fails in configure

2012-04-14 Thread Dan Horák
Zoltan Boszormenyi píše v So 14. 04. 2012 v 18:27 +0200: 2012-04-14 17:20 keltezéssel, John Reiser írta: What should I do to make rpmbuild work for --target=i686? Does this work: export CC=gcc -m32 rpmbuild -ba --target=i686 ... Yes, it does. Although I still get signs that

Re: When F16 PPC image will be available ?

2011-08-04 Thread Dan Horák
Manash Kumar Nayak píše v Čt 04. 08. 2011 v 16:28 +0530: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/08/11 10:24, Manash Kumar Nayak wrote: I was looking for F16 PPC Alpha TC1 image, but unfortunately could not

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha PPC64 ISO Images ?

2010-08-25 Thread Dan Horák
Subrata Modak píše v St 25. 08. 2010 v 13:27 +0530: James, Were we not to have public availability of PPC64 images from Fedora 14 Alpha onwards ? Fedora for ppc/ppc64 moved from primary to secondary status since Fedora 13 and it's now developed outside the main build system with it's own