-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/08/2015 10:39 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Mike Chambers
> wrote:
>> Has anyone gotten the above kernels from subject to boot with a
>> nouveau video driver and/or with plasma 5? The latest kernel
>> that works
On Sunday, October 05, 2014 07:03:10 AM Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I woke up this morning to no internet. ifconfig showed an IPv6 address,
> but no IPv4 IP..
> systemctl restart network didn't do anything.. so I rebooted & got
> network back. Is there a better way?
> fedora 21 amd_64
> is there a /va
On 12/17/12 08:54, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:22:53 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>
>> Very odd, works for me:
>> rpm -q coreutils
>> coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64
>
> Do you see an rpc_pipefs entry in the output of mount?
> If not, you
On 12/17/12 08:18, ergodic wrote:
> Jachim, which df (coreutils) are you using?
>
> I am using: coreutils-8.15-9.fc17.x86_64
>
>
>
>
>
> I am using Fedora 17. "df" without any param works FINE .
>
> Screenshot attached.
On 12/05/12 22:59, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:46:50 -1000, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> Well I never knew about that handy littl
On 12/05/12 14:42, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi,
>
> F18 currently has a huge number of unapproved updates queued in
> updates-testing. Could folks that are on F18 please run
> fedora-easy-karma occasionally and file karma as appropriate?
>
> And please don't only file negative karma, positive karma
On 11/20/12 00:27, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all F18 testers,
>
> I have problems with hibernate/resume in F18 after having installed
> all available updates (including updates-testing):
>
> 1. Hibernating from a gnome3 session and then resuming, the screen
> remains dark, no input possible. Pr
This is one of those "it used to work, I think" things.
Fedora 18.
NetworkManager-0.9.7.0-6.git20121004.fc18.x86_64
On subnet with IPv6 address auto configuration enabled. NetworkManager
brings up interface, link-local (fe80) address is configured, however no
global address is configured.
Link
On 10/07/12 00:22, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Installing : kernel-3.6.0-3.fc18.x86_64
>96/190
> grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
>
>
> The new kernel is not added to the grub.cfg. This is
> grubby-8.20-1.fc18.x86_64
On 10/02/12 12:20, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 06:27 PM, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>> Dual booting with Windows, HW time is local time, how do I configure
>> Fedora to not expect UTC time?
>
> You fix it window site since it's windows that
Dual booting with Windows, HW time is local time, how do I configure
Fedora to not expect UTC time?
Used to be system-config-date, that isn't working so hot right now,
starts up, etc. but does not seem to save the changes. I guess there
used to be an /etc/sysconfig/clock, that doesn't exist.
I fe
Let me first say I am not here to gripe, well at least not too much,
just passing along my impressions.
System:
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_ab5febc0-0f09-4d9b-b21e-063d268e3067
My first run through the installer failed because of disk partitioning.
I know this is a known issue area so n
On 01/13/2012 06:09 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> logrotate is installed.
> chckonfig doesn't list it
> systemctl status logrotate.service
> says no such files or service.
>
> service logrotate start
> goes to systemctl
>
>
Logrotate is run via cron. /etc/cron.daily/logrotate.
-Erinn
signature
The latest set of updates to my system went, well, rather poorly. It
almost feels like an alpha to me again which is kind of fun. The issues
I mention below may be related, they may not be, and/or I may just be an
unlucky person.
During the update upon installation of selinux-policy-targeted, the
On 10/14/2011 01:51 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 04:03 PM, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>> So I go in with my fingerprint to see what is happening, and I run a
>> sudo command (really slick the fingerprint auth with sudo, kudos),
>> trouble is it tells me I am no
On 10/13/2011 10:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:04 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cool, well g
A number of interesting things broke/fixed themselves today in F16. But
first a bit of history.
GDM has not been working for me for a couple of weeks at this point,
about 70% of the time I can't login when clicking on my user name (after
entering my password I will hit enter and nothing happens),
On 10/12/2011 12:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Erinn Looney-Triggs gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
>> it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
>> and blah is a very old k
One is a little silly, the other is a pain.
The easy one:
Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
and blah is a very old kernel number (by very old I mean three
weeks ago). Now I can see in /e
Just in case anyone is interested. It was very much a hardware issue
that was leading to the system experiencing thermal issues, just so
happens that upon upgrading the Fedora 16 I was paying a lot closer
attention to the logs and noticed it. Not sure why I wasn't able to
reproduce it as easily in
On 09/12/2011 02:58 PM, Pekka Pietikäinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 10:37 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>
>> I know we hear this all the time in this business, but it used to work
>> just fine. Perhaps it is hardware failing, but why then would windows
>> never di
On 09/12/2011 02:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 14:11 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>> On 09/12/2011 01:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> Just as a datapoint, I am typing this on a thinkpad T510 running f16,
>>> and I see no heat issues. In no
On 09/12/2011 01:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Just as a datapoint, I am typing this on a thinkpad T510 running f16,
> and I see no heat issues. In normal operation I see 45-46C, and when
> under heavy load it hits 60's and keeps running along fine.
>
> kevin
>
>
Kevin,
Thanks for that info, I to
On 09/12/2011 11:45 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> If you don't do anything in Windows to cause extended high CPU usage,
> then obviously the system temperature will remain lower.
>
> I suspect if you, say, ran Prime95 for a while in Windows, it might
> reproduce the issue.
I ran stress -c 5 (I ha
Adam,
I suppose it could be the manufacturers fault, I have had this Lenovo
ThinkPad T510 for a long time and never had any issues with it. As well,
this thing isn't even on my lap it is in a dock with a pretty decent
ventilation setup.
I know we hear this all the time in this business, but it us
Yeah the argument can always be made that it is a HW issue. In this
case, running under windows I run into no thermal issues. As well,
running under F 15 created no thermal issues. I will give a shot at
disabling debugging to see what happens but this feels more deep seated
than that to me. However
Since moving to Fedora 16 my laptop has been constantly overheating. In
fact with the tracker-store taking up so much CPU it creates a perfect
storm and the system will sometimes shut itself off because of the high
heat in the CPU.
>From the logs:
[ 2718.556684] intel ips :00:1f.6: MCP limit e
Thanks for the ideas, in an inspired moment of clarity I fixed the
issue up. So for any other poor schlub who happens to run into this
issue (why was it only me?) whereby when booting from a rescue disk and
attempting to do a yum downgrade, you get a Unable to load yummain
error, here is how I fix
> Thanks Artem, I've added this to F14Blocker list, as it clearly impacts
> the final release criteria if all systems fail to boot.
>
> This updated required a few additional steps in order to rollback the
> glibc update to return to a working system. As with anything, there are
> many different w
Anyone else lost the ability to move gnome panel via alt + click in
fedora 14? My memory is not great but I believe this worked in 13 just
wanted to confirm before I file a bug.
-Erinn
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
30 matches
Mail list logo
