On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> >
> > It definitely isn't dnf mucking up. This is the second time I've fresh
> > installed today, and I haven't used dnf at all. I installed my apps,
> > updated, and I got a bunch of scr
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> El Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:07:26 -0500
> Jon Ciesla escribió:
> > My Gmail thinks this is a scam. Did something change? If not, sorry
> > for the noise.
> >
[nightview]
> nightview-cli-0.3.3-9.fc20.i686 requires libcfitsio-3.340.so.0
> nightview-gui-0.3.3-9.fc20.i686 requires libcfitsio-3.340.so.0
> [nightview]
> nightview-cli-0.3.3-9.fc20.i686 requires libcfitsio-3.340.so.0
> nightview-cli-0.3.3-9.fc20.x86_64 requires
>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 07/22/2013 12:44 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> I'd suggest either the person's sponsor or
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group
>
> How does one find out someone's sponsor?
>
>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> What can be done about a package maintainer with, for lack of a better
> term, an ongoing attitude problem?
>
> Here are some examples of interactions I've had with this individual. I am
> trying to be circumspect because I'm not trying
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 12/04/2012 08:38 AM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Tue Dec 4 09:15:31 UTC 2012
>
> VICTORY! NO BROKEN DEPS in Fedora 18!
>
>
> Now, I ask you all, please, please. Help me keep it that way!
>
> ~tom
>
> ==
> Fedora
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> I attempted installation using Fedora-20120703-x86_64-916dfe7-netinst.iso and
> found that it only allows choosing one desktop. I normally install both Gnome
> and KDE at this point and asked about it on #anaconda. Dlehman it was not
> planne
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jayson Rowe wrote:
> I saw a blog post this morning from Kevin Fenzi
> (http://scrye.com/wordpress-mu/nirik/2012/05/09/fedora-17-prerelease-and-updates-testing/)
> about how the updates-testing repo is now disabled, and I should do a
> 'yum distro-sync' to ensure
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Pedro Francisco
wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
>>> I am getting frequent kernel panics when shutting down my laptop. It is
>>> running the latest F17 with all updates.
>>>
>>> La
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 04/25/2012 07:45 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>> Once upon a time, Kevin Martin said:
>>>
>>> Transaction Check Error:
>>> file /usr/bin from install of
>>> google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1115.1-133713.x86_64 conflicts with file from
>>> p
> On 07/21/2011 04:33 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Seems like this is still broken though. I still see 3.1.11 in updates.
>
> I think it is due to the fact that there hasn't been a push for a few
> days. I'll wait for a push before raising hell.
What he said. It's been retagged, but without a
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>
>> I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
>> It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
>> Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
>>
>> /usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleear
cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
> 2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth mailto:m...@cchtml.com>>
>
> cornel panceac wrote:
> > ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> > selinux\* policy\*.
> > one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the
>
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
>> selinux\* policy\*.
>> one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
>> and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
>> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>>
>
> Define "remove".
>
> If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
>
cornel panceac wrote:
> hello,
>
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
I don't know. I'm not sure why you'd want to, what do you have in
mind? Why Disabled or Permissive insufficient?
-J
--
Valent Turkovic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:29 -0400, TK009 wrote:
>>
>>> I got an email this morning from the Fusion Linux group. In it, the
>>> group lead suggested this to one of his users -
>>>
>>> "Fusion 14 betais ba
TK009 wrote:
> I got an email this morning from the Fusion Linux group. In it, the
> group lead suggested this to one of his users -
>
> "Fusion 14 betais based on Fedora 14 which isn't released yet so there
> could be number of bugs that haven't been fixed yet. I suggest you
> report the bug via f
18 matches
Mail list logo
