On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:40 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:35:39PM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > On 8/28/19 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:53:20AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > > On 8/26/19 11:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 2
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:41 AM Josh Boyer
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:41 AM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mo
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 23:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I understand them. The point is, for them and even us (the
> > > > installer)
> >
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 01:39:33PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> Next week is the crunch week before F26 final, but it's also holidays
>>> in two countries with a lot of key Fedora c
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 00:05 +, Bowen Wang wrote:
>> Hi, When I tried to update my rawhide using the command:
>> sudo dnf upgrade --refresh after downloading all the
>> packages needed, it says:
>>
>> Error: Transaction check error: file
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> We had some nice discussions about rawhide in my friday workshop at
> flock. I thought I would post here to get input from folks not there,
> and also allow people who were there to comment more now that it's not
> after 5pm on
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> for Fedora 21 testing *overall* - i.e. it's the QA team's responsibility
>> to make sure the WGs do the stuff assigned to them in the plan. If that
>> makes sense. Discussio
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 12:54 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I've started working to identify packages with missing upstream test suites
>> or
>> not running the tests in %check. Having a list of hundreds of packages now I
>>
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 08:57 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > For the alpha I reported that I had problems (glacial speed being the main
>> > one) trying to do a live install on a machine with 512 M
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 10:54 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> > Seriously? It's hard to imagine whoever is responsible for that page has
>> > any
>> > idea how to make anything usable, much less possesses
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012-12-02 20:14 (GMT-0800) Adam Williamson composed:
>
>>> ...it also indicates an ad hoc approach to solving UI/UX
>>>
>>> problems, rather than having someone particularly skilled with UI/UX
>>> vetting the entire design from the outset.
>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> For the last few weeks, I get frequent call traces in Rawhide. It normally
> happens when I'm attempting to do a yum distro-sync. As a result, I've had to
> do
> daily updates in rescue mode only. This is in a VirtualBox 4.2.4 guest with
>
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I can make strong cases for many things we cannot scale to. I'd love to
>> see those pushing for this to actually step up and do it. Get testcases
>> written, form groups of triagers, just run the damn tests regardless of
>> criteria st
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-11-10 9:36, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>
>> 1) It's making something Fedora does not build, provide, or have any
>> influence on part of our release process. Doubly so if you're going
>> d
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:14 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:49 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>> > On 11/09/2012 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >>
>> >&
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:49 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 08:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> Maybe you're talking about running Fedora as a vbox or vmware guest on
>> some other OS?
>
>
> Yup those are the use cases I'
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 07:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> My personal take is that Windows doesn't try and load things into the
>> Linux kernel, or otherwise disrupt the installed Fedora OS so I don't
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:37 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 07:24 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/09/2012 07:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wr
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 11/09/2012 07:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> Smolt is also being retired:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Smolt_retirement
>>
>> The stats also have not been updated in quite a while.
>>
>> I'd take any data from smolt with
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:23 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 02:53 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> The general understanding among Storage People is that we're aiming to
>> go to btrfs by default for F19. Finally. That's one of the arguments
>> against changing the default_now_
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:48:21 -0400
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> Maybe I missed this somewhere, but why is fpaste being replaced to
>> begin with? It's been working fine for a really long time. I guess
>> I don&#
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Athmane Madjoudj
wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 01:33 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> Unless I'm missing something, this new system has no provision for
>>> viewing expired pastes. It doesn't even let you know you
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:18 AM, wrote:
>> Post the full dmesg output of the boot. There should be a section in
>> there about loading the module signing key with a key listed. If that
>> didn't succeed, it will produce that error message when a module is
>> loaded, but it will still load.
>
>
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:51 AM, wrote:
>> From: Carl G
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> You should consult https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secureboot
>
> Okay, that page certainly sounds like a good start, but it seems short on
> some details. My custom spin uses only Fedora-provided boot components,
> kerne
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 07:44 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 8 October 2012 18:01, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/08/2012 04:53 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:29:18PM -0700, Chu
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was asked to try the drm-intel-next-queued for an intel drm bug (see [1]).
> While frequently rebuilding packages, I've seldom had to rebuild a kernel,
> especially with such a huge patch. In this case, I was lucky and the diff
> be
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Looking into it more though, the problem appears to be that you are
> looking in the wrong place. I have kernel-3.6.0-0.rc6.git0.2.fc18 in
> updates/testing/18, not development/18 (which IIRC is normal
> post-Alpha). My mirror synced that a c
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:22 PM, kevin martin wrote:
> Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below. I've
> also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this same time.
> Anybody with any thoughts on how to get this fixed so I can run X again?
Does this happen i
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Pedro Francisco
wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a spurious condition from which I can trigger a
> kernel crash from which no recovery is possible in most cases
> (context: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/95588
> ).
>
> Since I can't reliab
> That feels like a 'policy' decision to me, so I've filed a ticket with FESCo
> to discuss it at their next meeting:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/941
>
> so if anyone feels strongly about this issue, please, chip in in the ticket
> or at the meeting. If people feel it'd be desirable,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 8/13/12 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> It is a test compose of the Alpha. Alpha comes before Beta which comes
>> before Final. For each of Alpha, Beta and Final, we do test composes and
>> then release candidates. The first test comp
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Josh Boyer writes:
>> You would contact the fedora kernel list. They would tell you that
>> Fedora doesn't enable staging drivers except in very specific cases.
>
> Hmmm, I presume there's a document de
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 24/05/12 12:53, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Erm... your grub2 config file you sent previously showed you were using
>> and x86_64 kernel. Do you even have the i686 kernel installed? There
>> are clearly
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 23/05/12 16:27, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
>> unknown-block(0,0)
>>
>> this means there was no initramfs even loaded
>>
>> check your bootloader config and the existence of the init
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:54 PM, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722
7209 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the delay in answering. I maintain F17 kernels with Speakup
> enabled. I don't have much of a repository, but I can throw them up
> somewhere for you to grab. The right solution is to have t
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> I am getting frequent kernel panics when shutting down my laptop. It is
> running the latest F17 with all updates.
>
> Last messages before the panic are:
>
> Cannot finalize remaining file system and devices, giving up.
> Succesfully changed
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:56 PM, stan wrote:
> I always compile the Fedora kernel package with a custom config that
> tunes it for my system. The config file that worked on the 3.3.2
> kernels fails on the 3.3.4 kernels, complaining that CONFIG_FB_EFI is
> not defined. I have no EFI, so it is t
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Alexander Volovics
wrote:
> Has RC6 power saving been enabled in the 3.3.2 kernel
> or must 'i915.i915_enable_rc6=1' still be added "by hand".
The F17 3.3.2 has backported patches to enable RC6 on SNB by default.
If you're asking about something other than F17, th
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Well that's an Anaconda bug isn't it? :)
>
> Still not a reason for a rolling release.
>
> I quite enjoy Fedora 14.
Please, if you do nothing else, upgrade your kernel manually.
josh
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 20:34 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote:
>>
>> > If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find a
>> > Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and e
On Mar 29, 2012 9:34 PM, "Michael Hennebry"
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote:
>
>> If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find
a Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and even if it does, might
not be supported by your BIOS or any available upgra
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> In previous releases the /etc/sysconfig/i18n file and the
> SYSFONT boot parameter named a console font.
That isn't actually a kernel boot parameter. If you set something on the
kernel command line and the kernel doesn't parse it, it turns int
bug' kernels?
Look for the first build of a new -rcX release. E.g.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=298302
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=300503
Notice the top of the changelog says 'Disable debugging options.' When we flip
the debug op
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
wrote:
> Is it GDM or systemd that is causing gdm to fail? Or, X? I can boot with
> single on kernel cmd line, start NM and then exit the emergency shell and
> GDM then comes up?
>
> Anyone else seeing this? What component to bz?
Dan Walsh diagn
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> While this won't have too much affect on upgrades from previous releases
> to f17/rawhide, it did cause me some puzzlement going from pre usrmove
> rawhide to post usrmove rawhide where I run nondebug kernels and needed
> to rebuild a third
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Tom H wrote:
> I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
> procedure from a pre-usrmove kernel. When I tried to boot from a
> kernel updated from the f17-usrmove repository (3.3.0-0.git4.1.fc17),
> I got:
>
> "/bin/sh: error while loading sha
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Josh Boyer (jwbo...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Rob Healey (robheal...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rob Healey (robheal...@gmail.com) said:
>> Can anyone tell me if rpmfusion's rawhide packages have been updated yet
>> for rpm guard?
>
> Given that, at best, rpmfusion builds against rawhide/branched Fedora,
> and that the converted packag
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Josh Boyer gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Should be fixed in the next f16 and rawhide builds that get done.
>
> The current F16 updates-testing kernel, kernel-3.1.7-1.fc16, has the same
> problem. Should that be rebuil
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:49 AM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:28:53AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> > John, any thoughts if that might be the case?
>>
>> Answering my own question, it seems that is the case. This is at the
>>
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Andre Robatino
> wrote:
>> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
>>
>>> I get similar output on F16, for example "rpm -V kernel-3.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64"
>>> gi
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
>
>> I get similar output on F16, for example "rpm -V kernel-3.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64"
>> gives
>>
>> ? /boot/System.map-3.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64
>> 5S.T. /lib/modules/3.1.6-1.fc16.x86_64/mod
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 05/01/12 13:22, Andre Robatino wrote:
>>
>>
>> delta does not match installed data
>>
>> so the full RPM is downloaded instead. Why is this happening?
>>
>
> It happens if some of the previously installed files are missing.
> Maybe a languag
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Didn't realise kernel-tools was not installed,
> until "rhgb quiet" removed.
>
> But I thougth they were joined at the hip,
> and an updated kernel would pull it in?
Nope. Unless you have something it provides already installed. On
rawhide,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Rawhide Report
wrote:
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> kernel-PAE-modules-extra-3.2.0-0.rc4.git0.2.fc17.i686 requires
> kernel-PAE-i686 = 0:3.2.0-0.rc4.git0.2.fc17.PAE
This should be fixed with the next
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> On Tue Nov 22 16:18:01 UTC 2011 Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> modinfo asserts:
>>>
>>> parm: i915_enable_rc6:Enable power-saving re
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 13:29 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
>> What about i915_enable_rc6 not being the default...? Does still put
>> stability problems? Does it make sense to enable it or not by default
>> based on different adapters/chip
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:12 PM, little.owl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking at the bug "Kernel panic when turning off screen backlight
> using laptop Fn key":
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748210
>
> The oops is caused by the null pointer dereference in the module
> ideapad-l
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:51 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> > Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
>> > sudo.
>> >
&
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
> sudo.
>
> [mike@scooby ~]$ sudo yum update
> [sudo] password for mike:
> mike is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
>
>
> [sudo] password for mike:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
> Tim Flink wrote:
>
>> My intention was to include issues with DomU running locally (with an
>> already functional Fedora Dom0) or on a Xen based cloud provider. My
>> implicit assumption was that Dom0 would a
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 05:49:22PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 21:29 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:50:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:03 +, Mich
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:50:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:03 +, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> ==
>> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
>> ===
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 02:14:01PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>Compose started at Tue Jun 22 08:15:10 UTC 2010
>
>Broken deps for i386
>--
If you're going to bump ghc, maybe you should request a build tag so you can
bump it and rebuild al
65 matches
Mail list logo
