On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 10:42 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> in F13, I can change the gdm-greeter background by klicking with right
> mouse button in my desktop, saying "Change dektop background", select
> some background picture and press "make default", so that picture was
> taken for the gdm-gre
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 23:24 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:01 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:50:14 -0400
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > I do too. I suspect for situations like this we at a minimum need to
> > > adopt a more formal process for p
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 10:14 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-3.6.7-1.fc14,xulrunner-1.9.2.7-2.fc14?_csrf_token=d9a1b71eaac4e787200ef64fb8f8e819a5793074
Yay, now I can perform a CSRF attack on you if you still have that
browser session open. Symfony s
The F14 updates-debuginfo repository appears to not exist. I get the
following error when I try to access it from my F14 VM:
# yum --enablerepo=updates-debuginfo list kernel
updates-debuginfo/metalink | 17 kB 00:00
Could not parse metalink
https://mirrors.fedor
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:20 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> 2010/8/29 Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> > Memory: 68088k/131060k available
>
> This is unlikely to work. I suggest to append "-m 512" to the start-up
> options in order to enable 512 MB of system memory. QE
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 14:24 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Perhaps it's a bad download? What does sha256sum say about the iso
> against the CHECKSUM file?
I verified the checksum against Fedora-14-Alpha-x86_64-CHECKSUM .
> This is a 64 bit machine right? :)
The host is running an x86_64 kernel, so
I am eager to play with systemd, so I tried to install F14 Alpha x86_64
on a QEMU virtual machine. The host is my Dell Latitude D620 running
F13 x86_64, fully updated with updates-testing enabled. I started the
VM with this command (f14.qcow2 is a blank 4GiB disk image created with
qemu-img):
qe
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The release notes are the one canonical thing you should always read.
I have edited the release notes to state that systemd is a "mostly
compatible" replacement instead of a "drop-in" replacement, and I have
copied the FAQ and Tips and Tr
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
> > Untagging them from updates-testing and removing them from the repo
> > way before they appear in the updates repo instead, is bad. It also
> > causes broken dependencies temporarily. Those
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:27 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:17:23AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:12 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > > Somebody who is missing something is you; namely that an information
> > > to deal with a fall out is la
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 20:49 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> My continuing adventures in fedora 14 alpha have finally
> gotten it installed, and I can even boot, but it insists
> on coming up in runlevel 3 (apparently). It won't start
> KDM and I get no graphical login.
>
> I have edited /etc/inittab t
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 11:43 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> BTW it would be nice if all the reporter tools are able to use the same
> credentials for reporting bugs. Now I had to fill in my bugzilla
> accounts settings twice.
Not to mention actual browsers. Probably the reporter tools should all
us
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 12:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 12:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > We aren't. The automated tests Rui refers to happen prior to branching.
> > They were effectively tests of F14, therefore, but the Python 2.7
> > transition happened *since* the last automa
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:17 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> It seems bodhi is abused more than I thought. [...]
> Why does bodhi allow editing of the package version? It seems that field
> should be locked from editing and the only course of action would be to
> delete the update and create a
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 11:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> RHEL bugs are frequently created as clones of Fedora bugs, and whoever
> cloned the bug forgets to clean up behind them. For instance, if you
> clone a Fedora bug which blocks F14Blocker to RHEL and forget to clean
> up, we wind up with a
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 10:43 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 13:23 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > I'm not sure what would be gained by having a fully separate Fedora bug
> > tracker. On the other hand, there are definite practical conveniences
> >
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 10:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 19:48 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> > Thoughts on any of this?
>
> Sorry, one further - the recurring issue that always comes up when
> things like this are in question is to remem
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 18:29 -0700, an unknown sender wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:09 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Possibly bikeshedding here, but would it be better to change the wording
> > slightly:
> > If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version
> > - of Fedora
18 matches
Mail list logo
