On 02/13/2012 09:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yes - it has, what, a hundred or so tests? Most of those could be
combined with at least one of the others...you don't need to be able to
do the math very precisely to realize that we can't, practically
speaking, have a test case for*every possible
Michal Toman wrote:
I've just updated the server so that it either generates the backtrace
correctly or displays a better error message. Hope this helps.
Thanks. Whatever you did made backtrace generation work though. One that
failed now generated successfully.
--
test mailing list
Every time I use the retrace server for the past few weeks I fail to get
a backtrace. The log shows this:
Initializing virtual root
snipping out 50 repeating lines
Initializing virtual root
Saving crash statistics
Retrace job finished successfully
Backtrace parsing failed for .
1:0: No frame
G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
Mostly due to 4.1.4 being X version 11 and rawhide being X version 12.
AFAIK VBox only supports X server 11. You'll have to poke the VBox
developers to see if there's an additions build that supports version
12. This list can't help you.
--
test mailing list
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I have pretty much gotten that from everyone (ASUS, IBM, HP, Dell,
nonames) when working corporate support. Consumer level laptops are
cheap because they are meant to run basically low level stuff most of
the time and high level stuff very very short times. The
Adam Williamson wrote:
Any thoughts, modifications, objections? Thanks!
Looks good. AFAIK, and I'm sure you're aware, booting off RAID is broken
with Fedora 16.
I used to have systems with /boot on RAID-1 but switched when I saw it
was not really supported and was broken in F16.
--
test
On 11/10/2011 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That's odd, the message should be harmless and not cause apps to
fail...but if it does, yeah, commonbugs it.
It is not going to cause applications to fail, but it will cause lots of
people to file bugs.
I've updated the bug and closed a bunch of
On 11/10/2011 02:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
In that case I wouldn't bother. It's been around a long time anyway, I
think.
As I added in the bug, it occurred way back when GTK2 was the only
player in town. It was fixed then. Now we have GTK3 and another Requires
needs to be added to
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I've switched off digest mode. Makes it easier to get past
looong posts about dependencies et al.
Now just switch off HTML and top-posting and you'll be set.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 11/03/2011 07:03 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Anyone else see the same problem with newegg?
I would have to guess it is a video driver issue instead of a Firefox
issue. You might want to state the video card and driver you are using
(proprietary or otherwise).
--
test mailing list
On 11/03/2011 02:15 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
At the Fedora 16 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 16 Final
Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on November 8, 2011.
Congrats. This is the first release without a slip in a while isn't it?
--
test mailing list
On 11/03/2011 02:36 PM, drago01 wrote:
So 2 slips equal means without a slip for you?;)
Clarification: Final did not slip.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 11/03/2011 03:09 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Bingo! You are a genius! I had ipv6 disabled in my fedora 15
about:config in firefox, on fedora 16 I had the default enabled
setting. When I disable it on f16, I can see the prices again.
Apparently it can't lookup the IP for content.newegg.com
On 11/03/2011 03:30 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:
Hmm, don't know that I agree with that. I've seen issues in other places
with IPV6 turned on or off respectively. Perhaps the
correct way to test that is to make sure to run firefox with all extensions
turned off, IPV6 set on, see what newegg.com
On 11/03/2011 03:45 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Actually, if I understood correctly, what I believe he said was that
the price data was fetched and inserted into the page by JavaScript,
and the JavaScript code in question was unable to resolve the host
name it needed to contact to fetch the
Neal Becker wrote:
Is it possible to cleanup this noise which has recently been added to the
reports:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-October/104011.html
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 11/01/2011 02:09 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
* (746693) Can't login via gdm when `metacity` pkg is not installed
(tflink, 17:45:22)
* LINK:http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746693(tflink,
17:45:26)
I took a look at the GDM source and it is hard coded to call metacity.
An
upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Eric Blake on 10/31/2011 04:35 PM wrote:
Yes:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-October/104011.html
Doh. Thanks.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It's been proposed that we setup another list that just contains the
'updates-testing' reports for folks who are interested in testing
updates, but don't want to see all the rawhide/branched discussion.
I suppose we could also expand it to have all testing/qa related non
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Would an automatically generated web page make more sense? I don't think
the old data has much value, so I would expect that going to a web page
to get the latest info when you want it makes more sense then getting
email messages continuously.
You mean like this?
Bruno Wolff III on 09/28/2011 04:20 PM wrote:
Not really. There are messages that limit the updates to those that
still need testing and are grouped by crit path and security as well.
While you could start with the general updates page it's useful to have
something help prioritize targets for
Peter G. wrote:
What is happening? How can I get the computers to communicate?
Is the firewall on both machines configure to allow port 22 through?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Peter G. wrote:
Doesn't that mean the firewall is open on port 22 (for both ipv4/6, even)?
netstat lists network port information. It does not know about or list
firewall configuration information.
iptables is the command-line tool to view, add, delete, or change
firewall rules.
# iptables
Michael Spahn wrote:
I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
You should file a bug...
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Peter G. wrote:
You know, I just tried your command again, but this time without grepping, and
I see that ssh is nowhere in the output, so how could grep ssh ever return
anything?
My command was an example of when a firewall rule existed to allow ssh
through.
But, when I examine
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
I assume you have rebooted after changing firewall rules and/or issued:
# systemctl restart iptables.service
If so, then I dunno
The apply button in system-config-firewall should apply the firewall
settings. He shouldn't need to reboot or reload the iptables
Peter G. wrote:
iptables -L does now show an ssh entry. Does this also do ipv6 (or would I
ever
need to deal with this in an ipv6 situation, down the road?)?
No. You will want ip6tables for that.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Peter G. wrote:
I guess thatś because I restarted after I came back from the body shop.
Yes, your iptables/ip6tables settings get loaded by the
iptables/ip6tables service upon boot-up. You can get the same effect as
running systemctl restart iptables.service and systemctl restart
Adam Williamson wrote:
I didn't say anything about dependencies. People file negative karma on
stuff like 'Obscure Menu Item Z doesn't work', or 'there's a typo in the
docs'. The more packages there are in an update, the more likely this is
to happen, and the more likely bad negative karma
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bodhi has the ability to bundle several updates together even when they
are not direct dependencies. He is referring to that
Yes, I understand Bodhi can link any group of packages together.
Example:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Obviously noone would try to bundle completely unrelated packages in a
single update. So I am not really what you are arguing about exactly.
Adam wanted to discuss Enormo-Updates and I think we just did.
*shrugs*
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
cornel panceac wrote:
was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere?
Yes. It was announced on all of the announce mailing lists. You have
to be subscribed to them to see the e-mail.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
cornel panceac wrote:
since we're talking about grub2, at the end of f16 rc5 i586 dvd install,
it tried for about an hour to do something with an non-existent fd0,
then failed to install onto the partition's boot sector. unfortunately,
this meant the newly installed system is not booting
Karel Volný wrote:
- last time I checked, the website with the docs was down, and it
lasted for at least a week, then I gave up (maybe it is online
now?)
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 07/21/2011 04:33 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Seems like this is still broken though. I still see 3.1.11 in updates.
I think it is due to the fact that there hasn't been a push for a few
days. I'll wait for a push before raising hell.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Michael Cronenworth on 07/19/2011 04:36 PM wrote:
I haven't discovered any conversations beside the one comment on the TB
5.0 bodhi update.
Nevermind. After looking at *closed* tickets, I found it.
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4828
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/16/2011 09:03 PM, Rob Healey wrote:
Is there any timeline for when fc16's filesystem will be defaulted to
btrfs and become the primary file system? When is the forced upgrade
to btrfs coming???
If you use preupgrade or yum to upgrade between Fedora releases you will
never have your
On 07/08/2011 05:40 AM, drago01 wrote:
Well the proper fix is to disable auto push if there is any negative vote.
The maintainer should then have to push it by hand (or if necessary
provide an updated package instead of letting it get pushed).
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/618
--
test
upda...@fedoraproject.org on 06/24/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
bodhi - 2011-06-24 17:57:38 (karma 0)
This update has been pushed to stable
... and now all users of gnome-shell have a broken system.
Bodhi should not auto-push updates that have any negative karma.
--
test
Adam Williamson wrote:
but lots of testers
don't seem to have such a problem.
From what I read in the comments, they were not using gnome-shell but
either gnome fallback or another DE.
More details would probably help.
I'm the user mooninite.
I either see a message in .xsession-errors
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Not sure it is related but
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2011-June/400607.html
I don't believe it is related. The system I tested with is fully up to
date with the updates repo. updates-testing is not enabled.
--
test mailing list
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You should file a RFE against bodhi
Done.
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/618
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Not sure it is related but
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2011-June/400607.html
I don't believe it is related. The system I tested with is fully up to
date with the updates repo. updates-testing is not enabled.
I had read
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
This is pure nonsence and please provide proper description of your
problem which is needed to properly diagnose your nfs and vsftp issue..
We'll never hear from Chuck. Over the years I've come to the conclusion
that he isn't subscribed to receive e-mails from the
On 06/08/2011 12:54 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
The headline says it all. They have to be started in rc.local
Your headline is very cryptic and is for a stable version of Fedora,
which is best served on the users[1] list. I recommend you post
additional background information
On 05/31/2011 12:05 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
How can you expect anyone to have a productive discussion with you
when the starting point is absurd hyperbole?
Jason, it seems the discussion is becoming so heated that you are
replying to the wrong thread.
It might be good for everyone to take
On 05/31/2011 01:11 PM, drago01 wrote:
A screensaver isn't the right tool for this ... there are lots of
dedicated apps for viewing family pictures.
Displaying random pixels (that just happen to be in the shape of photos)
is not a proper tool for screen saving? Huh? I believe he is not using
On 05/31/2011 01:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
it would also be great if those who understand what the hell they're
doing with IPv6 could check over the Wiki page for accuracy and
completeness.
There don't seem to be any formal test cases presently. Are there some
in drafts that I don't see
On 05/31/2011 12:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
What do you mean? I quoted the hyperbole.
I just received Pasha's initial e-mail, which you quoted. My mistake.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 05/31/2011 01:26 PM, drago01 wrote:
You missed the point.
Cutting out important parts of e-mails is something I used to do. It
helped emphasize when I missed the point.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
cornel panceac wrote:
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Define remove.
If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
Disabled. If it doesn't then you should file a bug.
cornel panceac wrote:
ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
selinux\* policy\*.
one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need.
Side note: This thread is a great
Ian Pilcher wrote:
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Do you have a fedora cert in ~/.fedora?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Ian Pilcher wrote:
I'm all for making maintainers lives easier, but ...
If you are not a packager you can just do:
git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/btrfs-progs.git
fedpkg is for Fedora Packagers. :)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
James Laska wrote:
Did you upgrade your system from F14? If so, depending on when you
upgraded, you may be seeing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699198
The current proposed workaround is to run:
$ systemctl enable rsyslog.service
According to the bug this is being ignored as
In Fedora 14 I had my NFS mounts nicely mounted at boot time. In Fedora
15 I have to manually mount them.
I think I saw some discussion about this issue in the past but I cannot
find it. Is this a known issue?
/etc/fstab:
intranet:/home/xandell/Music /media/music nfs4
On 05/12/2011 11:14 PM, Chris Kloiber wrote:
I would expect systemd to try and mount it, but I guess the nfs4
defaults may be different from nfs. try adding 'auto' as an option.
for extra bonus points, try adding comment=systemd.automount as an
option, then boot up and do 'ls
Joachim Backes wrote:
I have similar problem: I installed VirtualBox from virtualbox.org, but
if the kernel is updated, no VirtualBox modules are updated: I always
have to rebuild them manually.
Yes, I have a similar problem.
I looked over the kernel.spec and found no change to the upgrade
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I'm not sure what has changed at this point, but I'm pretty sure it has
nothing to do with the kernel package. It must be with grubby and one of
its processes no longer calls DKMS.
Further hunting seems to point me in the direction of DKMS itself. It
has some kernel
Is the abrt retrace server supposed to work?
I ask because, well, it didn't seem to work for me. I let it sit
Analyzing for a good 30 minutes and nothing happened. I've tried it
twice now with the same result.
Michael
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 04/27/2011 09:05 PM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
cobbler-2.0.11-2.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-6119)
Boot server configurator
Per Bothner wrote:
I'm hoping someone can reverse engineer at least how to disable nvidia.
Looks like you are in luck. People have started to reverse engineer it
and have made some progress towards an easy-to-use tool[1] to switch
between cards.
[1]
Per Bothner wrote:
I got a new Sandy Bridge i7 laptop with nvidia/optimus graphics.
I managed to install the new KDE beta, after a few problems.
However, there seems to be some issues with nouvaeu trying to
start up: One issue is errors messages and slowness starting up:
[snip]
My
upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
cobbler-2.0.11-1.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-5680)
Boot server configurator
Update Information:
New
seth vidal wrote:
wasteful to what?
When I create updates in the future should I make them hundreds of lines
long like I'm in detention at school, too? I don't like resulting to
sarcasm, but I don't see how you see this as not wasteful.
Meaning: Scroll down the updates e-mail and look at the
seth vidal wrote:
I mean - it's not waste unless there is a limit to the number of bits.
you don't NEED to download the updateinfo to get the updates.
Again, let me clarify. I'm not talking about bytes. With compression
these lines make up no significance of the updates metadata.
Is it
On 03/21/2011 08:56 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
How can I get just gnome3?
There is no more Gnome 2. Gnome 2 is deprecated in favor of Gnome 3.
Fedora 15 will only contain Gnome 3.0.
No one will maintain or distribute any part of Gnome 2.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
It sounds like you're looking for the build list[1].
[1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
Scratch that. That's for koji/mock. I think you want something else.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Sorry, but I do not have time for it. Gnome developers can do whatever
they like with
their software. But they should expect that it will meet with critical
reactions from users.
Restart option was in Gnome menu since I can remember - and I remember
the times of RH
Johan Scheepers wrote:
Please. Is there some key strokes that I can do to get past this
flashing or whatever?
The way I got around it was to press CTRL+ALT+DEL and click on Switch
User. At that point I received a GDM login selection that was not
segfaulting and I could click on the Live User
On 02/09/2011 10:03 PM, Rob Healey wrote:
I just came across this today and I know that it is past Feb 8th, but
is it too late to get involved in this anyway???
Can just a normal user using mass-rebuild.py and mass-tag.py get
involved in this project?
I would appreciate as quick of a
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Ye must realize that maintainers will shit all over reporters claiming
that they do not respond reports and what not by doing what the
bugzapper script or abrt is doing.
If you're not willing to look over bug reports for /your/ bugs that are
fixing to be CLOSED
On 11/09/2010 11:55 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/kernel/2.6.35.6-52.sched1.fc14/
Running this kernel is not any better. After leaving my system idle for
10 minutes I finally saw it dip below 0.10, but after leaving the
computer, and coming back 10 minutes later, I see
Jan Wildeboer wrote:
(Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me)
... and it broke the thread. You should tell your employer to provide
you a more FOSS friendly device (a.k.a. Nokia N900).
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Adam Williamson wrote:
The N900 is unfortunately impractical in territories with no 1700 or
2100 band providers (or poor ones).
For 3G, yes, but I live with 2.5G service as I'm almost always near a
WLAN AP. (I don't have 1700 or 2100 service near me). The N900 should be
able to provide voice
upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following Fedora 13 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.7-4.fc13,nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc13,nspr-4.8.6-1.fc13
This update needs to be removed from bodhi.
--
test
xcieja wrote:
I have just joined Fedora Community, and i would like to ask how does
testing look here ??
Can anyone focus on the part he/she is interested in and test it or is
there any person who take care, prepares test cases and assigns people
to tests ??
Is there any guide describing
Richard Ryniker wrote:
do you have more information, perhaps a reference to something
that documents the goal of this mega-dvd effort?
You might find this thread[1], created two days ago, interesting.
[1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/095021.html
--
test mailing
James Laska wrote:
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2010-10-25
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
And... the meeting minutes.
Minutes:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
It's almost certianly to own the directory... s-c-keyboard should be
fixed to just dual-own it.
There's a bug[1] as old as 2007 open for this. Who would be the right
people to poke to fix this simple spec issue? There's a Fedora one[2]
open as well.
[1]
Bill Nottingham wrote:
W.R.T. the Fedora bug, any provenpackager will do. Hey, wait, I'm one.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2549666
Thanks. I'm just a regular packager. :P
(Not intending to push this for F-14 myself, but if someone wants to
go ahead and do it as an
Christopher A. Williams wrote:
But the two camps can - and should - at least be expected to play
nicely with each other. The rules of engagement between the two could
be similar to when two proprietary software companies collaborate while
each keeps their own code closed from the other.
From
I'm using VirtualBox 3.2.8. I had to use the VNC installer as X would
not start even with basic video driver selected.
After installation and fixing systemd (yes, I know it's known) X would
still not start. Xorg.#.log shows it is attempting to use VESA but never
starts. Anyone have it running?
On 07/29/2010 04:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
A bug in PackageKit got out in a Fedora 13 update
which broke update notification, which is obviously a big problem.
PackageKit isn't actually on the critical path for F13, but it is for
F14 and up.
Is there a big tracking this? Was it
101 - 185 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
