Re: F40 Final test request: NVIDIA RTX 3000 GPUs

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024, 11:47 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! See also the thread between AV and Frantisek ("changes to > nouveau driver in kernel 6.8.2 and higher?") > > Can anyone else who has a similar NVIDIA GPU please try booting the > Workstation live image - > >

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 Available Now!

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:45 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:41:48 + (UTC) > rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 40 Candidate Beta-1.9 is now > > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > > testing! For more

Re: gnome-session-46-alpha-1 has broken Budgie sessions

On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 7:52 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > I rolled back to a working backup of Rawhide Budgie and selectively > upgraded until I could no longer log into a Budgie session, and it's the > upgrade to gnome-session-46-alpha-1 that did it. Previous 45.0-6 works. > > Further, downgrading

Re: Multimedia group still referencing gimp-heif-plugin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:29 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 12/19/23 14:19, Ian Laurie wrote: > > On 12/20/23 08:44, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:37 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > >>> > >>> I notice that: > >>> >

Re: Multimedia group still referencing gimp-heif-plugin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:20 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > On 12/20/23 08:44, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:37 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > >> > >> I notice that: > >> > >> sudo dnf group upgrade --with-optional Multimedia > &

Re: Multimedia group still referencing gimp-heif-plugin

On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 4:37 PM Ian Laurie wrote: > > I notice that: > > sudo dnf group upgrade --with-optional Multimedia > > produces the error: > > No match for group package "gimp-heif-plugin" > > Seems like "gimp-heif-plugin" no longer exists in the repos. Is this a > bug in the

Re: Make toolbx a crit-path package

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 3:00 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 10:09 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:40 PM Adam Williamson > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 19:57 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > > Hey Folks! > > > > > > > >

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 12:00 AM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:04 AM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:48 PM Sumantro Mukherjee >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello >> > >> > >> > Th

Re: new criterion proposal: toolbox functionality

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 10:48 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > Hello > > > This has been silent for a long time now but here's the update. > Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0]. > We DO care about not just the rpm but also the OCI image that we ship > with Toolbx.

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:18 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:49 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a > > > blo

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 2:28 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-04-20 at 08:20 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > I would like for us to have some testing criteria around gaming and > > Steam so that we can ensure we're offering a working gaming

Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 5:14 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 1:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I would like for us to have some testing criteria around gaming and > > Steam so that we can ensure we're offering a working g

Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

Hey all, I would like for us to have some testing criteria around gaming and Steam so that we can ensure we're offering a working gaming experience in Fedora Linux releases. This is motivated by the issue we had in the F37 cycle where glibc broke popular multiplayer games[1]. I was reminded of

Re: new criterion proposal: Window manager functionality

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > Related to a recently proposed blocker [1][2], I propose a new release > criterion which would cover such cases. Here it is: > > > The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common > application content - that

Re: criterion change proposal: macOS dual-boot

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:56 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says: > > > > >

Re: criterion change proposal: macOS dual-boot

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:31 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:55:33AM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Our current macOS (still called OS X) dual boot criterion says: > > > > "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an > > existing OS X installation,

Re: 6.1 kernel in F36/F37?

On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 2:48 PM Andre Robatino wrote: > > What's going on with the 6.1 kernel for stable releases? Normally, there are > Koji builds even if it's not intended for stable releases yet, but the only > Koji build for the 6.1 kernel was for Rawhide. Is there an issue causing it > to

Re: Video issue

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 11:23 AM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > > This is something I first saw at first branch and I have continued > monitoring it since. There has been no change. > > The problem is that MP4, and AVI videos will not play on Totem. This is > probably not a blocker based on the

Re: Heads up: GNOME 43.0 megaupdate is in testing

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 4:30 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Just a quick heads up that the GNOME 43.0 final release megaupdate is > now in F37 updates-testing: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0bd68bbb43 > > This is the GNOME version that's we'll be shipping F37

Re: Release criteria proposal: require GNOME Shell extension install/remove to work

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 3:35 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! > > So a bug came up at today's blocker review meeting: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106868 > > it takes a minute to parse, but the tl;dr is that right now in Fedora > 37, you can't go to

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:29 AM Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:23 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > Wading into this discussion pretty late... there's far too much "GNOME does > this" or "GNOME wants that" in this discussion. > > That is really not how it works, neither for

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:06 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > Hi there. We just learned that there's an opportunity to have a brand new > Fedora Media Writer 5.0 (with a completely redone UI, but using the same > background code) together with the Fedora 36 release. The timing is tight, > but we

Re: dnf system-upgrade conflict

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 6:46 AM Alessio wrote: > > It is not the first time that performing a system-upgrade from 35 to > 36, I get: > > Error: > Problem: problem with installed package mlocate-0.26-31.fc35.x86_64 > - package plocate-1.1.15-2.fc36.x86_64 conflicts with mlocate > provided by

Re: [Anaconda-devel] deprecate bootloader selection criterion

On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 6:54 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 2:37 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_

Re: [Anaconda-devel] deprecate bootloader selection criterion

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 5:21 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Final_Release_Criteria#Bootloader_disk_selection > > "The installer must allow the user to choose which disk the system > bootloader will be installed to, and to choose not to install one at > all. "

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 10:50 AM John Mellor wrote: > > On 2021-11-08 9:31 a.m., Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:25 AM Frantisek Zatloukal > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:05 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > >>> "dnf install foo bar&

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:25 AM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 3:05 PM Kamil Paral wrote: >> >> "dnf install foo bar" > > > This is a single operation, comparable to having multiple packages installed > via graphical package manager, not scheduling multiple operations

Re: Proposal: Migrate “Common Bugs” from the wiki to Ask Fedora

On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 8:36 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 11:43 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Background > > -- > > > > Every release since possibly the dawn of time (or, at least, [Fedora > > Core 5][1]), we make a [Common Bugs page][2] on the wiki. This is where

Re: Fedora 35 Wayland and Darktable hard lock

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:39 PM Leander Hutton via test wrote: > > Hello, I recently upgraded to FL35 and noticed that Darktable under a Wayland > session causes a hard lock of the whole session. Both the package that ships > with the distro and the release version compiled from source. I did

Wayland and basic graphics mode

Hey all, During the final days of Fedora Linux 34 development, it was discovered that Plasma Wayland hangs when kernel modesetting isn't available[1]. It was resolved for F34 with a downstream change to sddm that checks if "nomodeset" is set and disables Wayland sessions accordingly. However,

Re: gdm / gnome-shell segfaults on Raspberry Pi 3B+

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 3:29 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 09:07 -0500, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > > Thanks for following up. I was mostly trying to gauge if this was common > > enough it should be a proposed blocker. > > > > Now, not to be a stick in the mud, but what other

Re: [Suggestion] Add `noatime` mount option

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:37 PM TheEvilSkeleton wrote: > > I'd like to suggest to use noatime mount option for btrfs. > > I've come across two posts about combining atime with btrfs. Unfortunately > those two should not be combined, as explained here: > https://lwn.net/Articles/499293/; and

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 12:50 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:24:38PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with > > pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name? > > If anything, I think it's a lot less common

Upgrade on F34 -> F34 on x11 utils split

Hey all, I attempted to do a distro-sync to upgrade my system to latest F34 pre-release packages, but I got the following error: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/bin/iceauth conflicts between attempted installs of xorg-x11-server-utils-7.7-39.fc34.x86_64 and iceauth-1.0.8-1.fc34.x86_64

Re: Need help with btrfs.

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:50 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:40:19PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > There are a few different types of full-disk backup, but if it's > > file-based and the atimes are modified, that's the intent of the > > backup process. The atimes are used

Re: Need help with btrfs.

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:03 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 02:58:00PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > We should find out if there's more widespread corruption. The basic > > command to scrub that particular Btrfs file system is: > > > > sudo btrfs scrub start /mnt > > It's

Re: How To Test pipewire On F33?

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 12:28 PM Qiyu Yan wrote: > > My procedure: > > 1. sudo swap pulseaudio pipewire-pulseaudio --allowerasing > --enablerepo=updates-testing > > If you lost sound: > > 2. sudo systemctl enable --global pipewire-pulse.socket > > The second step should be done automatically,

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 9:19 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:01 AM Kamil Paral wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> >> &

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:01 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> GNOME applications pull in most of the GNOME desktop as dependencies. >> Properly developed KDE applications will pull in the KF5 libraries and >> occa

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka >> wrote: >> >&

Re: Testcase Audio Recording Basic (new test case proposal)

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:15 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:24 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:04 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: Have you tested whether gnome-sound-recorder works well in KDE and optionally also other desktops? If not

Re: [External] Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:04 PM Mark Pearson wrote: > > > On 20/01/2021 11:11, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:44 PM Mark Pearson > > wrote: > > > > Release cadence is once. We just can't update our preload images that > > often - there's a

Re: Respins for OEM preloads

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:50 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > A large computer vendor with whom we have a friendly relationship would like > to update the image they're shipping on their systems so that 1) new users > don't have quite so many updates immediately and 2) auiu newer kernel helps > with

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Make Fedora CoreOS a Fedora Edition (System-Wide Change)

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:19 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 09:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > == How To Test == > > See QA test cases : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:CoreOS_Test_Cases > > > > We also have regular tests days, for example > >

Re: Blockerbugs discussion tickets feedback 

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:57 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > * Using Magic Text for voting and admin is awkward and error-prone. > Better UI for this would be really helpful. In addition, the state > isn't automatically updated when you vote or mark a decision, so I > always find myself manually

Re: fedora 34 Rawhide testing in Virtualbox

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 1:20 PM Stephen Snow wrote: > > Judging from the image at the link provided I would say you need to select > your installation destination. > Actually, it looks like MirrorManager wasn't responding quickly enough for getting it to setup properly. It's supposed to

Re: snap question

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:59 PM David wrote: > > I wanted to try to learn something about snaps, so I installed what > is written below: > >sudo snap install mate-wayland --edge --classic > > But in the log-in screen, I switched to the MATE desktop environment, > and just got a bunch of

Re: desktop spins, btrfs copy test request

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:38 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for testers: > - Fedora 33 > - User home is on Btrfs (clean installed or converted, in a subvolume > or not, these details won't matter) > - using any spin other than Workstation (kde, lxqt, xfce, etc are all >

Re: btrfs testing

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 7:43 PM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > > > After the QA meeting today, I spent a few hours trying the get Rawhide > 0703 WS Live installed with btrfs. > > I have Rawhide 0703 WS Live on a thumb drive. I know this works fine > when taking the default for the disk. I was

Re: Blocking on user switching: redux

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 3:05 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 12:04 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > >

Re: Blocking on user switching: redux

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:01 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:26 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 11:13 am, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > So, once again: do we think it makes sense to consider desktop user > > > switching - that is, switching

Re: Proposal to adjust final criterion for backgrounds

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30:07PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Well, you could check based on EVR of fedora-release. Stable release > > is always has Release field bumped to 1, and unstable is below 1. > > True --

Re: Proposal to adjust final criterion for backgrounds

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:25 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 08:18:27AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > It kinda harks back to a time where we had more custom artwork, I think > > - like boot splashes and stuff? I don't totally remember, but that was > > basically it, at

Re: Blocking on user switching: redux

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:14 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi folks! > > So, during Fedora 32 Final blocker review, a bug relating to "user > switching" came up for review: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817708 > > I dug into the question of whether we have tended to consider

Re: Automatic blocker addition proposal: desktop background criterion

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:59 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! So, it was suggested at the blocker review meeting on Monday > that violations of the Basic desktop background criterion: > > "The default desktop background must be different from that of the last > two stable releases." > >

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:23 AM wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 13:25 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > > > > Josh, to be fair, I can see Neal's point here. In a way you seem > > > > to be > > > > kinda sending him in circles here:

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:30 PM Laura Abbott wrote: > > > > I also think there are other perspectives that might at least > > potentially be useful here. Right now we've mainly heard from a couple > > of community folks who are very passionate about btrfs, and Red Hat > > folks from

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:57 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:48 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Josh Boyer > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > &

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:30 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:41 AM Josh Boyer > > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > &g

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:41 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:19 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 23:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 2

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 5:55 AM wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 23:54 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote: > > > > > > I understand them. The point is, for them and even us (the > > > installer) > > > is work

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 7:16 AM wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-08-24 at 07:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 19:00 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > > > > So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:16 AM Laura Abbott wrote: > > On 8/23/19 9:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson > > wrote: > > > >> So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and > >> this got accepted as a release blocker: > >> > >>

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:48 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:44 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > All of this, the criteria, and the UI support for btrfs are from the > > many years old proposal to make btrfs the default filesystem. In the > > beginning, it was not ready,

Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:48 PM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:17 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > Hey folks! > > > > So, there was recently a Thing where btrfs installs were broken, and > > this got accepted as a release blocker: > > > >