Re: Heads up - Anaconda 22.17 will enforce 'good' passwords

Hi On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > This Friday's build of Anaconda will no longer allow you to use weak > passwords and click done twice. In order to promote more secureish > default systems I have increased the password length required to 8 > characters and removed allo

Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.

Hi On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > I notice that dnf does not have "swap". Is this intentional? > Yes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110780 Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

Hi On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > > Unallocated space was contained in an extended partition; Anaconda > detected only free space on the outside of it. > Would you please file a bug report against anaconda with this information? Post the link here when you are done. Ra

Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.

Hi On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Aha! I don't see a dnf version of the `swap` command, and dnf doesn't > have the `shell` either. Worth an RFE? > Dnf developers seem to think this is not needed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110780 Rahul -- test mailin

Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.

Hi On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > Sorry to start yet another thread on the same issue But I only just > now discover that once you install "Fedora Workstation" you can't install > another desktop Try, # yum swap fedora-release-workstation fedora-release-nonproduc

deja-dup package split

Hi Just a quick heads up that I have split the deja-dup nautilus extension into its own sub package (for Rawhide and F21 - rhbz#1152449). While I have added the sub package to the comps for fresh installations (f22 and f21), existing users would only get the core package on updates and will have

Re: Who is the genius who is trying to remove yum?

Hi On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:55 PM, poma wrote: > > Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20141011 > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/1492/7831492/root.log > .. > Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction : dnf-yum conflicts > with yum-3.4.3-155.fc22.noarch > This was my mista

Re: It is all about Adam!!

Hi On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Amita Sharma wrote: > http://fedoramagazine.org/edora-qa-adam-williamson/ Good work. Could we add a redirect to fedora-qa instead of edora-qa? Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable

HI On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > Even if I could see evidence of breakage I wouldn't know what to do about > it. I'm simply using SeaMonkey's reply-to-list button, which strips the > inanely long "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" from > the "To:" fie

Re: bug attached images not browser loadable (was: bug to which attached)

Hi On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Felix Miata Felix, for some reason every reply of yours ends up breaking the thread. Can you please fix that? Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: dnf cache is very large....

Hi On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > I assume this is not planned nor correct (since my yum cache is much > smaller) but can't seem to clear it out with any of the dnf > commands. How can I clear this up gracefully? > This should really be reported as a bug against dnf.

Re: [OT] Fedora forums down?

Hi On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > Sorry to post this here, but it's the only Fedora mailing list that I'm on > at this point. Does anyone know what happened to fedora forums. They've > been down for a few days now. > Thanks, and again, apologies for the OT posting. >

Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem

Hi On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > I thought Yum was mostly a friendly find and fetch layer on top of RPM, > while RPM actually does the work of dep resolution, installation and > removal. > Sort of but it does matter whether fedup is using RPM directly or running yum upgr

Re: Fedora 20 release day FedUp bug: post-mortem

HI On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > If you're going to do > that you may as well make it also do the upgrade 'offline', as fedup > does. But that's really about all fedup does: it really just boots to a > special systemd target and does 'yum upgrade', when you boil it d

Re: Criterion revision proposal: KDE default applications

Hi On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria that say > "we really stand behind the package sets installed from the DVD" if we > don't. > That is true however the solution is not to weaken the release criteria b

Re: dnf vs yum groups information

HI On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:17 PM, nonamedotc wrote: > If that's true - it might be a tad inconvenient? > File a bug report against dnf noting the difference and you will get an authoritative answer as to whether it is a bug or a intended design Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedorapr

Re: F19 Installer a little better, but...

On 06/20/2013 10:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: So if I'm reading things right, no, langtable doesn't currently make any attempt to associate each Indian language with a territory any more specific than 'India', and as currently implemented, couldn't actually do this. Mike may well correct me if

Re: F19 Installer a little better, but...

On 06/20/2013 09:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: To me that's just more illustration of the problem. Do things look better to an Indian who just wants to install in English anyway if we: a) default to English? b) default to an Indian language they don't speak at all? Obviously its globally easier

Re: F19 Installer a little better, but...

On 06/20/2013 09:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Frankly I'm not 100% convinced that it's a good idea to try and guess language even from a fairly reliable geolocation mechanism like ours. It's still not 100% reliable - people behind corporate VPNs can be routed through just about anywhere - and e

Re: Hotot broken after Twitter API changes, other twitter clients as well?

On 06/14/2013 07:48 PM, Patrick Lists wrote: On 06/14/2013 09:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: I think most clients have already switched to the new API a while back but feel free to check and make sure of this. I have filed an update for Hotot at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hotot

Re: Detecting Time Zone - F19-TC1

On 06/06/2013 01:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Eh, it didn't really seem that significant to me, and it ought to be pretty obvious...but you can throw a needs_release_note flag on the bug if you like. Not on its own but along with the rest of the changes, it should be documented. This is sort o

Re: Detecting Time Zone - F19-TC1

On 06/05/2013 01:18 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: As of F19 it does, it doesn't just default to America/New York (or try and guess based on language selection), it tries to get the default right via geolocation. This is the sort of thing that needs to go into the release notes, marketing material e

Re: F-19 Branched report: 20130508 changes

Hi On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 05/08/2013 02:47 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages > > gnome-applet-sensors - probably should be blocked. > I have retired the rawhide branch as a provenpackager and filed a tic

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/29/2013 12:54 PM, Kevin Martin wrote I'll post a bugzilla but, fwiw, unar worked a treat: $ unar tomato-K26USB-1.28.9054MIPSR2-beta-vpn3.6.rar tomato-K26USB-1.28.9054MIPSR2-beta-vpn3.6.rar: RAR CHANGELOG (44863 B)... OK. tomato-K26USB-1.28.9054MIPSR2-beta-vpn3.6.trx (6823936 B)...

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

Hi On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 04/29/13 00:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > > On 04/27/13 18:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Hi > >

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

Hi On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 04/27/13 18:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Martinwrote: > > One archive it can't open can be found at: > > > http://sourceforge.ne

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

Hi On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > > Hmm, installed updated file-roller and can't unpack a .rar file. Is there > something else that needs to be installed behind it? I > see the error "An error occurred while loading the archive.". > The new file-roller is supposed

Re: my impressions of F19A, from Radeon testing day

Hi On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I've never quite got the 'being proud of having a keyboard with no Super > > key' thing. It's a handy key. > > Before today, I've never heard of it. I'm going to guess the Window

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/25/2013 03:36 AM, drago01 wrote: Does it work with encrypted rar archives? Yes. Encrypted rar archives are supported and I have tested it explicitly as well https://code.google.com/p/theunarchiver/wiki/SupportedFormats Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/18/2013 01:45 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Red Hat bugzilla seems to be acting up. I will file a review request when that problem is fixed Done https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384 Changes have been

Re: Fedora 19 L10n test - Feedbacks

Hi Ani On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Ani Peter wrote: > Dear All, > > Thank you all for your time and support in making Fedora 19 testing event > a success. For further improving the l10 test event, please feel free to > provide all your feedbacks at [1]. [1] is missing Rahul -- test mail

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

Hi On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Red Hat bugzilla seems to be acting up. I will file a review request when > that problem is fixed > Done https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=953384 Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > unarchiver is supposed to have a free software implementation that is > capable of extracting RAR3 format. It isn't packaged for Fedora yet. > > https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/free-rarv3-extraction > >

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

Hi On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > We can't use the code because it isn't free. It has use restrictions. > Someone would have to write an unrar from scratch with a free license for > it to get into Fedora. > unarchiver is supposed to have a free software implementatio

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!

Hi On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: > > > [snip for brevity] > > Live DVD boots as far as black screen after progress bars & no further > with no output whatsoever running on KVM on Fedora 17 on a Lenovo > ThinkCentre MT-8808. > Do check bugzilla and file a bug report. Mark

Re: Installation completion time delay

Hi On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:59:08AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 03/29/2013 11:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > >> I've only done TC3 installs on a VM. > >> At the end of the install process o

Re: Installation completion time delay

On 03/29/2013 11:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: I've only done TC3 installs on a VM. At the end of the install process one clicks on "Reboot" at that time the screen then goes blank and the phrase [terminated] shows at the top of the screen for what seems to be over a minute before the reboot happe

Re: Draft onboarding process changes

Hi On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's a wiki ;) Please, do fix problems if you see 'em. I'll try and take a > look, but it's totally fine to just go ahead and fix up pages for errors / > out-of-dateness. > I have added a note on using yum-config-manager to enable the

Re: Draft onboarding process changes

Hi On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Sounds like a sensible idea for sure. If you suggest it to Luke he might > be able to stick it in the next version. > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/713 Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: No "19" yet in Bugzilla version field

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > The automated bug reporter in anaconda 19 won't let me specify rawhide and > won't file the bug since 19 isn't in the version field. > Sounds like a bug in the bug reporter :-) Please file it Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedo

Re: Draft onboarding process changes

Hi On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/QA:Update_feedback_**guidelines. >> >> >> Ideally, bodhi should link to this >> > > It does. It's the first link under 'Welcome to bodhi

Re: Draft onboarding process changes

Hi On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > For those who applied to the proven tester and/or BugZappers groups and > are wondering what this thread means - we still want your contributions! > Those who are interested in the proven tester process, please just go > ahead and tes

Re: 2012-11-05 through 2013-01-28 - Fedora QA Meetings - recaps

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:.html > > The previous incarnation dates to July 2005: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/triage/2005-July/00.html > Since you love history, Jack

Re: 2012-11-05 through 2013-01-28 - Fedora QA Meetings - recaps

Hi > Additionally, there is some history to Bugzappers as a separate project > which was before my time, but as Johann has explained it to me, it was > something of a 'I'm taking my ball and going home!' thing that led to it > being set up as a separate sub-project outside of QA > .IIRC Bugzappe

Re: 2012-11-05 through 2013-01-28 - Fedora QA Meetings - recaps

Hi On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > As always, minutes and IRC transcripts available on the wiki at: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20121105 > Would it be possible to summarize why BugZappers is getting pushed off? Thanks Rahul -- test mailing list tes

Re: New Anaconda - BACK, BACK, BACK...

On 09/13/2012 06:30 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > Please, don't tell me that this is because configuration could be done > in parallel and it's for my convenience and to give me the choice which > aspect of installation I prefer to configure first. Maybe it's good for > advanced users but for

Re: NetworkManager bridging features available but not usable?

On 06/25/2012 02:56 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote: >> Not here. Might be worth poking Dan directly by email or on IRC >> (dcbw). He may be able to clarify. > > Did anyone do this yet? If not, what is Dan's email adress? I'm trying > this on F-17 and have the same experience -- it's simply not doing > anyt

Re: GNOME3 compatible Dogtail on the way!

On 02/08/2012 06:43 PM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote: > > We are currently obtaining the administrator rights for the Trac (so we can > update the home page) as well as downstream Fedora access. Of course, we'd > like > to put 0.8.0 into Fedora repos by the time it's released (hopefully in time > for

Re: No more cpuspeed in F16

On 11/13/2011 07:07 PM, Benjamín Valero Espinosa wrote: > First of all, excuse me because maybe this is not the right list to ask > this. After a clean install of Fedora 16 I have found there is no > 'cpuspeed' package anymore. Googling a little I have found an alpha version > of the release notes

Re: Testing team presence @ Fudcon India Pune

On 10/17/2011 07:04 PM, A S Alam wrote: >> > Yes, I can take session. Register your talk in http://fudcon.in then and let me know if you need any help. Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: tracker-miner-fs consuming lots of CPU?

On 10/12/2011 06:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > >> Anybody else seeing anything like this? Known issue? Open bug? > > I'd say it's a 'known issue' in the sense that every freaking 'desktop > search' mechanism I've ever come across has b

Re: Some notes from fallback mode

On 09/23/2011 03:13 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Sigh. I've been running Rawhide for a very long time. As of the last > year or so, though, almost every post I make draws a response like > this. I'm dense, I'll admit, but I'm getting the hint. Rawhide > probably does not have much of a future on th

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 14 + updates-testing - 2011-09-13

On 09/13/2011 02:41 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: > > == > The results in this summary consider Test Updates! > =

Re: ABRT Retrace and F16, not supported?

On 09/09/2011 03:42 AM, Michal Toman wrote: > The server is now supporting F15 which is considered stable and at the > moment has a higher priority than F16. M. Ideally, this should have been handled before Fedora 15 was released with that option as default. For Fedora 15 users, many reported

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 16 + updates-testing - 2011-09-06

On 09/07/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: > > == > The results in this summary consider Test Updates! > =

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 16 + updates-testing - 2011-09-06

On 09/07/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: > > == > The results in this summary consider Test Updates! > =

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 16 + updates-testing - 2011-09-06

On 09/07/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: > > == > The results in this summary consider Test Updates! > =

Re: security update process failure

On 09/05/2011 08:44 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > So, I guess what I'm asking is, is it ok to give +1 to any/all > packages if they work at all/we don't notice any regressions, or do we > have to actually test what they are supposed to fix? Thanks. It is ok to +1 if you don't notice any regressions

Re: security update process failure

On 09/05/2011 02:31 AM, Karsten Hopp wrote: > Hi ! > > > I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package gets > stuck in > -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, where > only one > proventester cared to test the updated package and commen

Re: F16: suddenly sounb preview in nautilus no more possible

On 09/05/2011 08:06 AM, Ruch G wrote: > Does sushi have a .deb file so I can install it in ubuntu? > > I tri-boot my computer > Try asking in the Ubuntu mailing list. This is off topic here. Also quote only as much as necessary Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: F16 Grub2 not including windows

On 08/26/2011 10:01 PM, David Lehman wrote: > We added code to automatically generate entries using os-prober, but > apparently os-prober is not available if you install from DVD without > enabling network repos. It's probably also unavailable if doing a live > install. We'll be working on rectifyi

Re: persistent gnome dep problems (F16 alpha rc3-5, alpha), --skip-broken wants to haul in 32-bit libs

On 08/25/2011 04:23 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: So there are items in this list that could be shipped in a separate update without any negative side-effects? I'm not a KDE expert, but I don't see a package that could be left off. If there are cases where package A and B are in an update and d

Re: persistent gnome dep problems (F16 alpha rc3-5, alpha), --skip-broken wants to haul in 32-bit libs

On 08/25/2011 04:06 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > You kept mentioning adding more packages to updates causes problems. > Typically adding packages is due to a dependency. > > If you're not talking about dependencies, what are you talking about? Bodhi has the ability to bundle several updates

Re: f16 installer message

On 08/18/2011 04:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > well, it's sort of an issue of how many details you need. If you're > doing custom partitioning you should ideally have some sort of idea > about partition tables (disk labels) and so forth. I'm not sure > anaconda is the right place for an essay on

Re: f16 installer message

On 08/18/2011 01:36 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > This will, hopefully, be documented. > > > Thanks for proving a point I made on the forums. I mentioned that I > found the message to be somewhat obscure. File a bug report. The message needs to be expanded to provide the details. Rahul -- test

Re: Oh YES! grub2 FINALLY

On 08/18/2011 12:27 AM, Bodhi Zazen wrote: > users to customize grub 2 is almost non-existent. > > All you really need is a documentation page, similar to this : > > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2 > > and reference the grub manual for further information. > > http://www.gnu.org/software/gr

Re: Security testing

On 08/03/2011 07:22 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > Hello, > > I just wanted to let everyone know that I've made a number of tests available > for > assessing security of the distribution. It is by no means a comprehensive > auditing > tool, but the scripts definitely find problems. > > http://people.

RFC: Fedora 16 Alpha release announcement and notes

Hi Feel free to edit the wiki directly or reply here for any additions or corrections https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F16_Alpha_release_announcement Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: grub instead of grub2 in F16?

On 08/09/2011 11:46 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > > Keywords: pattern after, might. Can fit these words into pretty much anything really. > > I suspect the actual *buntu problem may be in parted, not debian-installer. Ubiquity is the default Ubuntu installer, Not d-i > Does Anaconda not used pa

Re: grub instead of grub2 in F16?

On 08/09/2011 11:26 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > > The reason I brought this up is my assumption that Fedora's Grub2 > installation might pattern itself after *buntu's, which destroys OS/2 LVM > information situated in the sector preceding Don't assume that. The implementation of the installer is e

Re: gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu installed by default?

On 08/08/2011 03:24 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > What prompted me to suggest this was the comment > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457#c74 referring to > http://www.golem.de/1108/85539.html (German article). Google's German > translation isn't very readable but AFAICT it seemed to con

Re: gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu installed by default?

On 08/08/2011 02:16 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > I'm considering filing a bug for > gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu > to be included in a default installation, considering that most users, > including > myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use >

Re: Post-TC1 strategizin'

On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images > were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in > when they arrive is a function of the developers, we don't have much > control over it =) That is a bit of a

Re: Post-TC1 strategizin'

On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy > for post-Alpha TC1. > > We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we > have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape. Why did this hap

Re: Any hope for system-config-services ?

On 07/22/2011 06:28 AM, agraham wrote: Rahul, I did not accuse you of anything except your outstanding contribution. I did say "I really get the feeling there is another agenda at work here" and what I was hinting at, was that Redhat are setting the Fedora agenda such that it NEVER becomes stabl

Re: Any hope for system-config-services ?

On 07/21/2011 02:56 PM, agraham wrote: > > > Rahul, this is no reflection on you, but the way you worded that > statement and given your huge contribution to Fedora over the years > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sundaram) concerned me :( It should concern you very much that you are accusing

Re: Any hope for system-config-services ?

On 07/20/2011 11:53 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or > anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable" > are greyed out. > > How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server > if services can not be enabled? Typically Fedora isn'

Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] firefox-5.0-1.fc15, xulrunner-5.0-2.fc15, gnome-shell-3.0.2-3.fc15, gjs-0.7.14-6.fc15, js-1.8.5-6.fc15, mozvoikko-1.9.0-5.fc15, gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-32.fc15, perl

On 06/25/2011 12:32 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> BTW, the auto-push happened*before* the two comments about Shell >> breakage. The only negative comment prior to that related to the strange >> character in the window title. > Yet, it was still negative karma. What's t

Re: [Fedora Update] [comment] firefox-5.0-1.fc15, xulrunner-5.0-2.fc15, gnome-shell-3.0.2-3.fc15, gjs-0.7.14-6.fc15, js-1.8.5-6.fc15, mozvoikko-1.9.0-5.fc15, gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-32.fc15, perl

On 06/25/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 13:06 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> upda...@fedoraproject.org on 06/24/2011 12:57 PM wrote: >>> bodhi - 2011-06-24 17:57:38 (karma 0) >>> This update has been pushed to stable >> ... and now al

Re: Trusted Boot project in F16

On 06/23/2011 05:40 PM, JB wrote: > Hi, > > The Trusted Boot topic/thread was started on Fedora dev list, with the purpose > of discussing it before planned F16 implementation. > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/153307.html > > They ask for input, and we would like to discus

Re: New BugZapper Introduction

On 06/10/2011 08:38 PM, Nick Jacek wrote: > My name is Nick Jacek. This summer I'm an intern at Red Hat, where I'll be > working on yum. Welcome. Do you know in more detail, what you will be working on? Just curious Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: http

Re: Draft btrfs testcase

On 06/10/2011 06:09 PM, John Dulaney wrote: > > > We will to have add tests cases for checking whether the filesystem > > degrades gracefully when it is being filled up but design is not the > > scope of the test cases. We would trust the experts, in this case, the > > filesystem developers to take

Re: Draft btrfs testcase

On 06/07/2011 10:56 AM, JB wrote: > If you are into it, spend some time reading this thread (you will also find > idea(s) for testing): We will to have add tests cases for checking whether the filesystem degrades gracefully when it is being filled up but design is not the scope of the test cases.

Re: freopen() broken in Fedora 15

On 06/10/2011 08:18 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > The standard IO freopen function stopped working on or about > the time I installed 64 bit Fedora 15 on the omen.com server. > > The attached program is derived from the 1977 Bill Joy version. > It does not display any text when compiled

Re: gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu not ejecting devices

On 05/31/2011 11:35 PM, Pratyush Sahay wrote: > > > Also, since the last update, the drive-menu icon is being shown > perennially even without any external drives being mounted. When i > click on it, its showing the hard drive partitions which i have > mounted from /etc/fstab .. This wasnt the beha

Re: gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu not ejecting devices

On 05/31/2011 11:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/31/2011 09:59 AM, Pratyush Sahay wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In the PackageKit GUI (Add/Remove Software) , the shell-extension : >> gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu has the following description : >> >> "

Re: gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu not ejecting devices

On 05/31/2011 09:59 AM, Pratyush Sahay wrote: > Hello, > > In the PackageKit GUI (Add/Remove Software) , the shell-extension : > gnome-shell-extensions-drive-menu has the following description : > > " Adds a menu in the system status area that tracks removable disk > devices attached and offers to

Re: systemd update fails

On 05/30/2011 03:58 AM, sean darcy wrote: > yum upgrade systemd > > > Is this just a temporary glitch in the repo? Or should I take some > action, like removing readahead? You should file it against systemd in bugzilla Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: h

Note: Fedora 15 questions

Hi Now that Fedora 15 has been released, discussions about it (other than updates-testing repo) should move to the users list. Test list should be focus on discussions regarding Rawhide and Fedora 16 branch when it is created. Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubs

Re: release notes f15

On 05/25/2011 02:03 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > hello > > at page > > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Changes_for_Desktop_Users.html > > the text > > Advanced users: > For system-wide theme changes, you can use this third-party tool >

Re: OT: GNOME a Linux-only project ? systemd a dependency of GNOME 3 ?

On 05/23/2011 11:56 AM, JB wrote: > Methinks ... geeks have too many itches ... and aversion to thinking ... > All the best to you ... from UNIX generation :-) You went through all the trouble to selectively take out parts of a mailing list thread, news posting and posted here as well but I think

Re: My Fedora 15 beta experiences so far

On 05/23/2011 06:54 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > I don't know, I found out that was the reason it didn't > work for me from another message where someone was saying that's > what happened, so I assumed it was a known issue. It also > requires a lot more code to go looking for ifcfg-* files > in order t

Re: My Fedora 15 beta experiences so far

On 05/23/2011 06:28 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2011 17:40:18 -0700 > Adam Williamson wrote: > >> are you sure about that? I haven't tested, but I see no reason why it >> would be designed that way > I'm positive that's what happened when I installed from the beta > dvd (and I see no re

Re: run level 3

On 05/21/2011 05:00 PM, James W. Bennett wrote: > how can I set fedora 15 to runlevel 3 > Thank you https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd#How_do_I_change_the_default_runlevel.3F Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list

Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement

On 05/20/2011 07:36 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > thanks, maybe another Power Management feature worth to note: > We have recently added support for Asus SHE (Super Hybrid Engine) > into tuned. Do edit the wiki and add the info directly. Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: fsck.btrfs? (Was Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement)

On 05/20/2011 04:34 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 05/19/2011 10:33 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> $ rpm -qf /sbin/btrfsck >> >> btrfs-progs-0.19-13.fc15.x86_64 >> > > > Is there a reason that package doesn't provide a fsck.btrfs symlink? No idea. Try

Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement

On 05/19/2011 09:51 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm not very experienced yet on the Fedora wiki system nor am I very > familiar with the wiki guidelines but I might be willing to volunteer, > assuming some guidance would be provided. Sure. If you have a Fedora account, you can create http://fedorap

Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement

On 05/19/2011 09:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I changed 'elaborate' to 'powerful' when talking about systemd's > dependency resolution mechanism. 'Elaborate' has ambiguous connotatio

Re: fsck.btrfs? (Was Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement)

On 05/19/2011 08:55 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > Where? > > [pilcher@ian ~]$ sudo yum --disablerepo=*-debuginfo provides '*/fsck.btrfs' $ rpm -qf /sbin/btrfsck btrfs-progs-0.19-13.fc15.x86_64 Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement

On 05/19/2011 08:28 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > "Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format" > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=fs/btrfs/Kconfig;h=ecb9fd3be1433838911f4c947627436d816cb136;hb=HEAD Config markers often don't reflect reality. Ex

  1   2   3   >