On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 14:59, AV via test wrote:
> Blocked executable in the ESP, ensure grub and shim are up to date:
> /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shimx64-fedora.efi Authenticode checksum
> [0ce02100f67c7ef85f4eed368f02bf7092380a3c23ca91fd7f19430d94b00c19] is
> present in dbx
Where did you get /boot/e
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 16:19, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME
> mega-update.
So you'd rather we ship GA with early pre-release builds of GNOME that
have had little-to-no testing? From a downstream point of view I'm not
going to fix t
On 8 July 2016 at 15:43, Ivan Tomica wrote:
> Is there a way to "undo" rating for some comment? For example, I accidentally
> hit "No" for one usefull comment. :yakes:
Don't worry too much about this; I'm hoping the effect of averaging
means it all works out. We're getting a huge number of positi
On 17 May 2016 at 22:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Settings > Power > Automatic brightness = On is the problem.
This is probably my doing, I added the feature for F23 IIRC.
> On my system it'll even go to the last setting and turn the
> display off as the room gets dark.
So setting the panel to 0%
On 27 April 2016 at 20:39, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> f24-backgrounds is updated with new version of default wallpapers in
> addition of its supplements. 24.1.1-1 is now pushed rather than 24.1.0-1
> because of the recent changes based on feedback from Gnome Software
> maintainer.
I've tested thi
On 21 April 2016 at 13:04, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> Does this take into account this bug:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865
Not yet; Kalev wrote some patches today to fix this but I asked for
unit tests :)
Richard
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
Hi all,
I've blogged about a COPR providing early access to the bits needed to
do a F23->F24 upgrade using GNOME Software here:
https://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2016/04/20/upgrading-fedora-23-to-24-using-gnome-software/
I'd appreciate any feedback or problems you face. I'm planning to
backport the
On 16 September 2015 at 09:31, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Actually, this was supposed to be fixed (PK was supposed to refresh metadata
> when it detected altered rpm database), but apparently it isn't.
Of course, the limitation is that packagekitd has to be running at the
time. I don't know if that wa
On 15 June 2015 at 12:12, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> 1) The gtk statusicon widget is deprecated in gtk3, will be removed soon.
Why do you need a status icon at all? I can't imagine why I'd want my
firewall sending messages to the desktop.
> I plan to port firewall-config also over to Qt for one of
On 20 January 2015 at 06:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Unfortunately these updates don't fix Bug 1178978 - offline update fails due
> to separate /var volume mounting too late
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178978
Right. This isn't actually a PackageKit bug as you correctly deduced.
I
On 20 January 2015 at 09:50, Tim Waugh wrote:
> But: will all Fedora 21 users need to run 'pkcon repair' manually, or
> can that be made automatic?
It shouldn't be required, unless someone has rpmdb index corruption
and doesn't want to reboot.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproj
On 19 January 2015 at 22:01, Jonathan Calloway
wrote:
> The path /updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif- cannot be found
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif-0.1.8-1.fc21
Richard
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.f
On 10 October 2014 13:21, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I thought so. Is there a place one could add things like installonly
> then? If not, what does it do by default? I mean, how did it decide that
> I had five kernels and installing a new one, making it six, implied
> removing three older ones:
The val
On 10 October 2014 12:27, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> So PackageKit, dnf & yum all have there own package transaction history.
No, libhif uses the yumdb as well. I've got no idea why dnf doesn't
use the yumdb as it seems to be the same format but in a different
place.
Richard
--
test mailing list
te
On 10 October 2014 12:00, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> 2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes :
>> No, it doesn't use yum at all.
> What does it use?
The librpm, hawkey and librepo libraries. We don't want to use DNF
itself as that would mean going from C->python->
On 10 October 2014 11:24, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> Try 'pkcon get-transactions'.
> Hrm - that works, obviously.
Or if you install gnome-packagekit, gpk-log
> Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use
> yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in dnf.conf, not in
> y
On 10 October 2014 10:26, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I've been running the 3.17 series for a while now - I'm on rawhide
> nodebug. I haven't seen any issues at all yet. They seem to work quite
> well.
Same here, no issues experienced.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On 4 September 2014 14:22, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but
> 'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already
> filed:
Either that, or apper should require PackageKit directly -- IIRC there
was some push a few releases ago t
On 16 August 2014 16:08, drago01 wrote:
> The flash package lacks an appdate file ...
I'm trying to work around this, something like
https://plus.google.com/107928060492923463788/posts/P6fZDrV5zwh --
should be in F21 in the next week or so.
The actual mechanism is like this:
https://github.com/h
On 5 December 2013 18:59, Adam Williamson wrote:
> This is only in updates-testing, right, we didn't send it anywhere
> important? :)
It's not super important, it should only affect people that use
syslogd, rather than the journal.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On 5 December 2013 09:33, Richard Hughes wrote:
> My error, sorry. I've fixed this in git and I'll do a new release next week.
There's a F20 build here if you'd like to do some testing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6259310
Richard
--
On 4 December 2013 21:36, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Message from syslogd@P5K-EWIFI at Dec 4 16:33:46 ...
> PackageKit:get-updates transaction /4692_ccdcccba from uid 1000 finished
> with success after 10490ms
My error, sorry. I've fixed this in git and I'll do a new release next week.
Richard.
On 4 July 2013 14:36, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I hardly think an update should be given negative karma for this.
Sure it should, the update is defective. The description isn't optional.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 16 May 2013 13:21, Kamil Paral wrote:
> What was the command/application that you've executed? What is your locale
> (type 'locale')?
Different issue, there's something funky going on with encoding in
yum/python and it's tripping up PackageKit. Can you file a bug please.
Richard.
--
test ma
On 10 January 2013 20:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> It's a archfull package obsoleting/providing a noarch package.
We could split out a colord-profiles subpackage (noarch) and make
colord dep on colord-profiles if that makes things easier.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On 10 January 2013 17:07, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If someone wants to go fix it, please do, otherwise I will later
> today. ;)
Opps, sorry. I've got a little baby to keep amused this afternoon, so
If someone could jump in and push a fix with a rebuild I would be very
grateful. Thanks.
Richard.
--
On 21 September 2012 12:32, Brendan Jones wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MATE-Desktop for your reference
> It's not a small job that's for sure.
I'm not sure I see the point. mate-power-manager is just the output of
a sed script changing all instances of GNOME to MATE of a specif
On 17 April 2012 12:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Frankly, when I found VNC being blocked was inhibiting my beta
> validation testing, I couldn't make head nor tail of the firewalld
> command line stuff so I just turned it off and went back to the static
> firewall. Progress!
Same here. I'm now ju
Hey,
I'd appreciate some more testing for the colord update
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16453 -- it fixes
a security bug (although very low severity one at that) and I would
like to push it to F16 as soon as possible. It's been sitting in
updates-testing for nearly a week n
On 16 November 2011 11:33, Jon Masters wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754252
atd really shouldn't be restarting on resume anyway
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 8 September 2011 05:03, Joachim Backes wrote:
> gnome-tweak-tool
Current, high level.
> gconf-editor
Legacy.
> dconf-editor
Current, low level.
> gconftool-2
Legacy.
> gnome-session-properties
Kinda current.
Richard
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
h
On 7 September 2011 22:33, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Ah, come on! That's close to blanket approval for such a high number of
> packages, which require much more individual testing. To sign them off
> all with a brief comment or a simple "works for me" isn't credible.
More to the point, GNOME isn'
On 31 August 2011 23:57, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So, I thought...LWN writing is almost done for the day, why not do an
> update and see what happens?
> I see the keyboard unpleasantness with both the
> kernel-3.1.0-0.rc4.git0.0.fc17.x86_64 kernel
I think 99% of the developers are now runnin
On 24 August 2011 16:08, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> Error: Protected multilib versions:
>> gnome-panel-libs-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 !=
>> gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.i686
> I have no idea what these errors mean or how to fix them.
I'm seriously wondering if multilib is worth all this hassle...
Rich
On 23 August 2011 15:43, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Should we expect this in rawhide? Runs for > 15 minutes like this.
No, file a bug. :-)
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 25 May 2011 20:32, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It doesn't change the gsettings value /usr/libexec/packagekitd retrieves
> when running as "root". That's the problem here (it seems to me).
packagekitd running as root has no way of accessing the session
gsettings values.
The update gsettings plug
On 25 May 2011 10:20, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> $ gsettings get org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.updates
> last-updates-notification
> uint64 0
>
> What does that mean?
Never been notified.
> $ gsettings get org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.updates
> frequency-get-updates
> 86400
>
> $ gsett
On 21 May 2011 22:50, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011 13:42:29 -0700, AW wrote:
>> you could look in dconf-editor too, but on my system I could only find
>> it in gconf, not anywhere in dconf...
>
> $ dconf list /apps/gnome-packagekit/
The updates functionality moved to gnome-settin
On 9 May 2011 23:50, ergodic wrote:
> The gnome-control-center crashes every time the Spyder-3 color calibrator is
> connected to the usb port in Fedora 15_x86_64. Is this a bug or an
> incompatibility of the Spyder-3 Elite with Gnome-3? The Spyder-3 and
> Gnome-2 have work perfectly with Fedora
On 7 May 2011 13:22, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
> I think that allowing dependency files may be a potential security breach.
Why?
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 29 April 2011 16:47, James Laska wrote:
> Unless this is intended, I think it's worth a bug report against
> PackageKit-command-not-found so it strips off any options, and only uses
> the $1 provided (not the entire arg string $@).
I thought I fixed this last release -- if not, please file a b
On 22 March 2011 12:31, Joachim Backes wrote:
> After taday having updated my system, I miss some icons in the
> activities bar (for example gmone-terminal), and in
> Activities->Applications: The icons are lost, only the icon identifier
> is visible, but not the icon itself. That is valid for a l
On 18 February 2011 04:47, Jon Masters wrote:
> FWIW, I have a rawhide box that is near totally hosed at the moment. Yum
> is reporting many duplicate packages, etc. even though I've run the
> de-duping package-cleanup (which reports that there are none, though yum
> itself complains on every oper
On 1 November 2010 17:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
> A few days after would be rather bad and should have been previously
> clearly communicated, given that preupgrade is one of our official 'Good
> Ways To Upgrade' and lots of people want to upgrade on release day. If
> there's a significant chance
On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote:
> *
> https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe
> Shouldn't Rawhide always stay in the list of releases?
No, we can no longer preupgrade to r
On 27 October 2010 10:42, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Anyway I think output messages should be consistent between the two tools...
I think this is a valid bug, in that gnome-packagekit doesn't show
anything in the UI if a repo is down. If you open a bug under the
component gnome-packagekit, version
On 9 September 2010 17:39, John Poelstra wrote:
> Richard Hughes said the following on 09/08/2010 12:13 PM Pacific Time:
>> This is bad, both from a "your system" perspective, and from a
>> "PackageKit reporting errors to the user" perspective. File a bug
>
2010/9/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> The decision to reject this feature certainly was a lesson in killing
> momentum which we will never reach again.
This is how I also feel. By trying to make Fedora shiny, polished and
super-cautious against breaking things we're just creating another
Ubuntu cl
On 8 September 2010 18:07, John Poelstra wrote:
> * Cancelling.. The transaction failed: internal-error, The backend
> exited unexpectedly. This is a serious error as the spawned backend did
> not complete the pending transaction.
This is bad, both from a "your system" perspective, and from a
"P
On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> No, its F-14 and had been broken since Aug 31st. The last good compose
> of gnome based (as in have gnome components) spins was Aug 30th. You
> can see it in the daily branched report [1].
Right, all my packages (gnome-packagekit, gnome-pow
On 6 September 2010 15:30, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Note that there is an update pending for systemd-9-3 that isn't going to
> show up in the nightly builds until the following dep issues are fixed:
> manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i686 requires libgnome-control-center.so.1
> gnome-packagekit-2.31.4-2.fc14
in
fedora-desktop if it's really important.
Thanks.
Richard Hughes
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 9 August 2010 12:04, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Thank you and kind regards
My three builds are now in bohdi.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 9 August 2010 11:47, Joachim Backes wrote:
> gnome-packagekit-2.31.4-2.fc14.i686
> --> Processing Dependency: libgnome-control-center.so.1 for package:
I'm working on this one upstream.
> gnome-color-manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i686
> --> Processing Dependency: libgnome-control-center.so.1 for pack
On 29 July 2010 23:01, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If everyone thinks this makes sense, I'll propose a wiki draft which
> sets up a system for package-specific testing procedures and drafts such
> a procedure for PackageKit. What does everyone think of this? Thanks!
Makes sense to me, I certainly ne
On 28 June 2010 10:06, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I was thinking about the word "periodically". When I see an update icon
> spinning, I can't say it happens periodically. When I don't see it
> spinning, I can't say it doesn't happen periodically. I can just say
> that it's happening/not happening at tha
On 25 June 2010 08:14, Kamil Paral wrote:
> How hard is this to check?
If gpk-update-icon starts checking for updates, which you can tell
either my watching it with pkmon, or just by observing the "updates
available" star that appears.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 22 June 2010 21:00, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> Richard answered this, but shouldn't gnome-icon-theme-symbolic have been
> pulled in by whatever package that needs it?
I suppose it should be in comps, or maybe as a require to something
generic like gnome-desktop3.
Richard.
--
test mailing list
t
On 22 June 2010 15:08, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> - the battery icon looks strange - very thin. Probably something to do
> with the symbolic icon support?
Install gnome-icon-theme-symbolic
Richard.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
59 matches
Mail list logo
