Hi Manish,
Sometimes, you can get negative positional values for Nodes, that do not
appear on screen themselves, or those that already ceased to exist.
I've looked over the application you have mentioned (if I guessed right :) ),
and there is a 'table cell' element in the UI tree which is right u
Hi All!
After having dealt with a number of issues in these last few months, we
believe that the updated Dogtail, GUI test tool and automation
framework, has now reached a state when we can release it. So finally -
now more than two years after the last stable version - Dogtail 0.8.0
is out! It's
> On 02/08/2012 06:43 PM, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
>
> >
> > We are currently obtaining the administrator rights for the Trac
> > (so we can
> > update the home page) as well as downstream Fedora access. Of
> > course, we'd like
> > to put 0.
Hi Folks,
just wanted to give a heads up for all of you who were wondering what's going
on with Dogtail as there's been no release for some time and no commits into
git Master branch since late 2009. This was due to fact that Dogtail is doing
pretty good and is rather stable with GNOME2/GTK2 appli
Adamw:
That leaves terminal / Terminal, and all the system-config-* vs.
control-center components (things like Date & Time are identical between
the two). That seems a larger problem than just the menu entries,
though. There's kind of a demarcation question here; GNOME seems to
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 05:50 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> > Are you referring to a situation in KDE(can't boot it now to check)?
>
> Of course. I quoted a specific point i.e. that "The way KDE
> application
> launcher handles this
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:54 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> > The way KDE application launcher handles this also provides nice
> > example for a design solution to this problem. They use a
> > "Generic" (e.g. Terminal) fi
Thanks John!
- Original Message -
Vita, I'll see if there is anyone at Southeast Linux Fest associated with xcfe
and lxde.
If so, I'll talk to them directly and report back here.
John
> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 05:37:13 -0400
> From: vhu...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject
> Let's bring this up on today's QA meeting, I am sure we'll get a good
> input on which way to go there.
On the QA meeting on Monday, we've decided to reach out to GNOME for ideas on
presenting duplicate application names in the overview. We'll see if they are
willing to help us. Based on that
> I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumption
> that it will be default for F16. I'd appreciate any additions or
> suggestions for addidtion. Note that it isn't finished yet, I'm just
> done for the day.
A nice start!
If, later on, you also manage to include in subcases tha
> I agree, this is a good starting point. I don't really see the point
> of the popups,
> but if other folks think they're necessary, I won't argue.
Wouldn't have to be popups. Actually they are used now to provide a
textual description of what the application does, e.g. for "Brasero
Disk Burner"
Thanks everybody for the input!
> Yeah, changing how the various desktop's launchers work is an upstream
> decision (in fact, changing what things are named in desktop files
> probably
> is as well.)
> > Sorry but I have to disagree here, cryptic executable names don't
> > belong in the UI at all
Hey folks,
At last Fedora QA meeting John Dulaney had a proposal concerning the issue of
similar application names we use around Fedora desktops.
For example: surely sometimes you had both GNOME and XFCE installed and went
for menus to open - say a terminal. The environment would use the same i
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110530
Topic: Security test cases from athmane
=
* Security test cases from athmane:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_OpenVAS
>
> Is the "old" one /usr/bin/nm-applet ?
>
No, I am not on F15 now, but I believe you can use
/usr/bin/system-config-network
--
Vita Humpa
Fedora QA
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
> > As discussed between QA and desktop teams on these lists, I've now
> > dropped the Final release criterion which stated "There must be no
> > ''Other'' menu or category" (referring to the system menus). I also
> > adjusted the desktop menus test case -
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Tes
- Original Message -
> As discussed between QA and desktop teams on these lists, I've now
> dropped the Final release criterion which stated "There must be no
> ''Other'' menu or category" (referring to the system menus). I also
> adjusted the desktop menus test case -
> https://fedoraproje
vhumpa wrote:
> This https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696121 deals with an
> issue
> that currently the system waits for 1 week to inform about possible
> non-security
> updates.
Darn, wrong bug, sorry!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688305
--
test mailing list
test@lists.
> Does anyone have an idea how to trigger the notification manually to
> see
> whether it works (other than changing date a week in the future) or
> does
> somebody know of a security package update i could try to downgrade?
Scratch that, I tested it by setting time in the future - works well.
>
This https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696121 deals with an issue
that currently the system waits for 1 week to inform about possible non-security
updates.
This brings up a question whether the "Testcase desktop updates" is still
accurate as it states that the notification should appear
gt; - Original Message -
> > Thanks, and notice that X would fail to start after DVD default
> > install,
> > see the bug for more info:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704042
> >
> >
> > Hurry
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 05:
ow_bug.cgi?id=704042
>
>
> Hurry
>
> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 05:51 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> > Great! I will do some desktop testing like last time.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On 05/11/2011 03:27 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
>
Great! I will do some desktop testing like last time.
- Original Message -
> On 05/11/2011 03:27 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release Candidate
> > 1
> > (RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages
> > for
> > downl
The final of the three Fedora 15 GNOME 3 Test Days took place on
2011-04-21.
It drew 23 testers which is little more than previously, while less
original bugs were reported this time - a fact connected to some great
work developers did on GNOME in recent months. Also this time the
final 3.0 packag
Hi everyone! Just a quick reminder that today is the third and final
GNOME3 Fedora 15 Test Day:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-04-21_GNOME3_Final
3.0 packages are already out and included in the Test Day images, so
please come along and help us with testing the "real deal".
Thanks!
Hey guys,
Final of the three Fedora GNOME 3 test days is to be held this Thursday. We
think that the current set of test cases covers most of the important
functionality. However, should any of you guys think that something might still
be missing (perhaps due to new functionalities added recent
SIGABRT)
As you can see, several bugs have already been fixed, and many more
remain to be worked on. Many of these bugs could benefit from triage,
so if Bugzappers have time to work on that, it would be great.
Let me say thanks again to all the testers, hope to see yo
Hey everybody,
does anybody know which component is responsible for the system keyboard layout
settings?
Found a bug when certain layouts selected during install are ignored by the
system
(GNOME etc. get's them fine, I am mean e.g. in tty).
Proper option is passed to kernel (KEYTABLE=cz-lat2)
Hi everybody,
I'd like to introduce myself - I am a new intern in Red Hat office in Brno,
part of the Fedora QA team. In coming months I will participate on ongoing
process of Fedora testing life cycle (notably on gnome-shell testing in the
approaching weeks) and AutoQA development. I look forw
29 matches
Mail list logo
