Hope you are right!
- On Jun 10, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 02:13:05PM -0400, ergodic wrote:
>> Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
>> not political forums.
>
> It seems that there
Well...there is Debian, Mint,openSuse, Ubunto, etc. So far they are
not political forums.
- On Jun 10, 2019, at 1:31 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 13:17 -0400, ergodic wrote:
>> Is this a high jack?
>
> It's a mailing list
Is this a high jack? Hope that Fedora and Red Hat are not becoming political
organizations nows.
Utterly disgusting! Keep politics out.
To Temlakos and George R Goffe: I completely oppose the expressed views.
- On Jun 9, 2019, at 9:47 PM, Temlakos wrote:
> On 6/9/19 6:09 PM, Jonathan
Welcome!
- Original Message -
> Hi
> This is my first mail in community, and so glad to have the
> opportunity to join this team and say hello, my name is FQ, and I am
> a former IBMer working in STG(hardware group), ATS(advanced
> technical support) team since 2003, the last job role
Nevertheless beautiful!
- Original Message -
La beauté est dans l'oeil du spectateur,
http://goo.gl/W4AwXE
poma
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
--
test mailing list
, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:08:37 -0400,
ergodic g...@embarqmail.com wrote:
No I do not. The only system change was the kernel update.
Downgrading to kernel-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64 or earlier
restores system functionality. Thus my conclusion that the
problem is kernel related.
It could also
to open them?
On 5 August 2013 04:00, ergodic g...@embarqmail.com wrote:
Felix and Sandro, thanks for your replies.
Basically booting fails defaulting to the maintenance mode option.
In maintenance mode parsing the 'journalctl' log shows the following failure
messages:
* systemd
i7 3770K 3.5GHz
Mobo: Asus P8Z77-V LK LGA 1155 Z77 ATX
Mem : Crucial Ballistix 16GB DR3 1600
HD : Seagate 1 TB and Samsung 160 GB
Thanks you all.
- Original Message -
On 08/05/2013 07:33 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 08:45:26PM -0400, ergodic wrote:
Can not boot
Can not boot with either 'kernel-3.10.4-200.fc19.x86_64' or
'kernel-3.10.4-300.fc19.x86_64'
Has any one had this problem?
Currently running with kernel-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64.
Thanks.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
.
Cheers
- Original Message -
On 2013-08-04 20:45 (GMT-0400) ergodic composed:
Can not boot with either 'kernel-3.10.4-200.fc19.x86_64' or
'kernel-3.10.4-300.fc19.x86_64'
Has any one had this problem?
Currently running with kernel-3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64.
kernel-3.10.4-300.fc19
Ankur thanks for for you repliy.
I will hold until next kernel update and if the problem persist
I will BZ it. In the interim I will try to debug the boot failure
Best regards
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 18:40 -0400, ergodic wrote:
It will not boot in my machine
No issue
This is also happening with Fedora 17.
- Original Message -
On 17.12.2012 10:07, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi F18 testers,
On my fully updated (coreutils-8.17-7.fc18.x86_64)
F18 box, the command df without any param does not output the size of
the root filesystem:
df
Filesystem
Well...Then why?
[root@xxx]# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs 3046148 0 3046148 0% /dev
tmpfs3056848 252 3056596 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs3056848 1440 3055408 1% /run
/dev/sda2 15346336 6825044
Jachim, which df (coreutils) are you using?
I am using: coreutils-8.15-9.fc17.x86_64
- Original Message -
I am using Fedora 17. df without any param works FINE .
Screenshot attached.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:43 PM, ergodic g...@embarqmail.com wrote:
This is also
It is clear that different scenarios require different rules.
I have installed Fedora for three different friends. All at different physical
locations from my place. These people have no computer knowledge, so giving
them elevated permissions spells disaster. However they must to be able to
Karel your philosophy is correct. I have seen this issue when my grandchildren
complained that they could not turn of their box after it was was upgraded to
F-17. That is why I filed Bug 843299.
Manny
- Original Message -
Dne St 25. července 2012 11:46:51, Adam Williamson
Thanks for your reply Adam.
Why then reboot does not complain? Reboot executes immediatly.
All those directives link to consolehelper or to systemctl, which should ask
for authentication if another user is logged.
- Original Message -
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, ergodic wrote:
Executing
Executing poweroff in F-17 (x86_64 up to date) defaults to the Authentication
is required for powering off the system while other users are logged in
snippet.
Only one user (user1) actually logged in, however results from who and
users show otherwise:
# who
user1 :0 2012-07-23 13:04 (:0)
of trust, which one is accurate?
However, I am inclined to believe that is the way Maxtor reports the parameter
in question.
Thanks to all,
Cheers.
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 13:35 -0400, ergodic wrote:
Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
Palimsest
Has anyone experienced Palimpsest discrepancies?
Palimsest in Fedora 16 reports a disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as failing: DISK
HAS MANY BAD SECTORS etc.
SMART: 197 Current pending Sector Count Value -4 sectors.
Palimsest in Fedora 17 beta reports the same disk (MAXTOR STM3320620AS) as OK
Richard, first of all thanks a lot for your work and efforts.
I have tested the new update colord-0.1.15-1.fc16.x86_64. It ran very
smoothly
with no operational difficulties or problems. Tow different monitors were
calibrated.
Equipment Data:
Mother Board:
ASUS P5K DELUXE/WIFI-AP Intel
their first run after installation locks up
the box requiring a hard reboot
Thanks again.
- Forwarded Message -
On 11/23/2011 10:54 AM, ergodic wrote:
Nouveau problem. Multi-booting F-15 and F-16. Nouveau works
perfectly
in in F15, but it does not wok in F-16. I have filed a bug
. It
worked right out.
As I mentioned, I have been using Fedora since version 3. Maybe because of
the greater program complexity or whatever, there is a need to raise the
standards.
Cheers
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 12:46 -0500, ergodic wrote:
Wish you and yours a Happy
I guess I will stay with F-15 until F-17 alpha is available.
F16 is the first Fedora I had to skip.
Best luck1
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 14:41 -0500, ergodic wrote:
Regardless there is something that changed from F-15 to F-16. F-15
runs with no problem.
Well
Adam your offer is typical of what I like about Linux and Red Hat (My early
steps in Linux were with Red Hat 7.2). Thanks.
I have a bug filed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755336)
Thanks again.
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, ergodic wrote:
I
Williamson ha scritto / said the following il giorno/on
24/11/2011 21:55:
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, ergodic wrote:
I guess I will stay with F-15 until F-17 alpha is available.
F16 is the first Fedora I had to skip.
If you report the bug, with appropriate details - see
https
/2011 21:55:
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:45 -0500, ergodic wrote:
I guess I will stay with F-15 until F-17 alpha is available.
F16 is the first Fedora I had to skip.
If you report the bug, with appropriate details - see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Xorg_problems - it's
You are correct! Specially when the brand new release crashes at first boot
after installation. Happy Holiday! - Original Message -
It seems to me that the appropriate distinction is not between stable
releases and releases in testing, but rather between testing-related
messages and
- drago01 gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Ralf Corsepius freenet.de
wrote:
On 05/31/2011 09:17 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Pasha Rpashar...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jason D.
Clintonjasonclinton.com
wrote:
You can also use the Disk Utility(my preference). It offers a Safe Removal
option
which actually turns the power off to the device.
- Adam Miller maxamill...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:19:28PM -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
I remember that in the old
After last night update yum fails with message:
Could not parse metalink
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-debug-f15arch=x86_64
error was
No repomd file
Error: File /var/cache/yum/x86_64/15/updates-debuginfo/metalink.xml does not
exist
Files updated last
, ergodic wrote:
After last night update yum fails with message:
Could not parse metalink
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-debug-f15arch=x86_64
error was
No repomd file
Error: File /var/cache/yum/x86_64/15/updates-debuginfo/metalink.xml
does not exist
Will do.
Thanks again.
Manny.
- Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:34 -0400, ergodic wrote:
Thanks Kevin and Adam
You are correct I have
yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info-1.1.30-2.fc15.noarch installed.
It has been removed and yum is working again
Antonio my apologies for the typo.
The key I used is the Pause/Brake key, not Pose/Brake as I typed. The drop down
menu shows it as Pause.
The key assignment is straightforward. And using it is very easy and fast.
Give it a try.
To define which key will become the Compose Key:
1. Click your
Give Gnome 3 a chance!
My first impression of Gnome 3 was awful. I came close to remove Fedora 15α on
account of Gnome 3.
However, I continued testing and gaining familiarity with the new program.
Today, after almost two months using Gnome3 I find it quite nice. As a matter
of fact, when I
Thanks, just installed xkill
- Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 12:46 -0400, ergodic wrote:
Are any plans to implement the force quit applet in Gnome 3?
force quit saves time and effort closing unruly applications
which
would otherwise require top
I have been following your informative threads with grat interest. However, I
have not foune .xinitrc nor .desktop file in my /home directory. I used
nautilus with show hidded files selected. A dump of the home directory with
tree -a are attached.
Regards
- Adam Williamson
Installation of gnome-applet-sensors fails with dependency issue:
Error: Package: gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.x86_64 (fedora)
Requires: libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
--
Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org
Antonio Olivares olivares14031 at yahoo.com writes:
Dear folks,
I took the plunge to Gnome 3 and although I am playing around, I wish to add
some of the old functionality like
there was before, i.e, add a starting up script, in the old way one
39 matches
Mail list logo
