I happen to have a monitor which doesn't support EDID and needs this, so
I gave it a try on F18-TC3 as it should be enabled now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857511
Dave Jones 2012-09-14 13:30:49 EDT
committed to f18/master
Unfortunately, I'm not having any luck with it.
[
On 11/20/2012 06:45 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
The standard ways of getting rid of the nouveau driver (up to Fed 17)
do not seem to work anymore in Fed 18:
add 'rdblacklist=nouveau' to GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX in /etc/default/grub
(and/or add 'blacklist nouveau' to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.c
With NV3x adapters experiencing 3D screen corruption in F16/F17, and the
abysmal gnome-shell performance of nvidia's 173.14.35 driver, I
attempted a yum upgrade to rawhide for a look at Mesa-8.1, which I
understand has a new driver. Unfortunately, that installation won't
start up.
So, I've b
On 04/14/2012 04:29 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
So I tried again.
I use grub's setup to put the bootloader on sdb and point it at sdb1.
I updated BIOS settings to use sdb.
Again anaconda labeled sdb partitons storage and sda partitions install.
It had sda marked for the bootloader.
It offered me
On 04/12/2012 10:51 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, mwesten wrote:
On 04/12/2012 07:12 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
No selinux message, but
Still no go.
I took some pictures of the "Details" message,
but the three are >60KB a piece after processing, >2MB befor
On 04/12/2012 07:12 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
No selinux message, but
Still no go.
I took some pictures of the "Details" message,
but the three are >60KB a piece after processing, >2MB before.
Should I send them to the list?
I put them on http://web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/~hennebry/new16-[123].pn
On 04/12/2012 11:52 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, mwesten wrote:
On 04/11/2012 08:52 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Here is the final grub stanza:
title Install Fedora16 from iso 11 15:34
root (hd0,2)
kernel /isolinux16/vmlinuz
On 04/11/2012 08:52 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Here is the final grub stanza:
title Install Fedora16 from iso 11 15:34
root (hd0,2)
kernel /isolinux16/vmlinuz repo=hd:LABEL=/home1:/iso16 acpi=off
processor.nocst=1 maxcpus=1 selinux=0
initrd /isolinu
On 04/10/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 21:14 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm pretty sure there must be a less strange and rarely-used way of
> doing it that would be usa
On 03/29/2012 11:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 20:34 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote:
If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find a
Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and even if it does, might no
On 03/29/2012 12:21 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
somebody has seen this too: "yum update" fails:
--- snip -
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/bin/yum", line 29, in
yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
Fil
On 03/01/2012 04:31 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 13:01 -0500, mwesten wrote:
I set this up on the Alpha release and the results are below. I'm
assuming there's something wrong with that top entry, but I don't know
how to fix it.
Events: 50K cycles
55.9
On 02/23/2012 09:54 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
In the non-steady-state, though, the current implementation is known
to be incredibly memcpy-heavy. Fixes coming soon, beta should be
much better I hope. If you want to collect some data about where CPU
time is being spent, 'perf record' against the
On 02/23/2012 09:54 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:44 -0500, mwesten wrote:
Fedora-17-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop.iso (RC2) on USB
2.13GHz AthlonXP 2600+ / RV200 (Radeon 7500) / 1280x1024
Fallback mode is fine, but once the shell starts, it's a battle just to
get System Mo
On 02/23/2012 02:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:54 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
For comparison:
3,2GHz Pentium 4 (HT Disabled) / Gallium 0.4 on ATI RV370 / 1680x1050
Fine. System Monitor CPU at 19%.
That's still way higher than I'd like, but it's at least an r300g bug
On 02/22/2012 02:42 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
I am afraid that I am not qualified to sensibly discuss underlying
mechanisms. I can only report what I see. In this thread
mwes...@verizon.net wrote "the processor gets pegged at 100%
continuously and it's not usable". I am not sure what was t
On 02/21/2012 05:14 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
At https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering
I am reading "The standard Gnome 3 experience is now available on all
hardware". Is this a plan, a wish or this is supposed
On 05/05/2011 03:42 AM, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> Can anybody report success for the suspend and resume cycle triggered
> from within the GNOME shell when the graphics card is based on some
> R300/R400 variant? In my case, the shell is still broken after resume.
> The video device is some ATI Rade
>> I happen to have an RV200, which I tried with F15BetaRC1, and while
>> it was generally unusable for many reasons, the fonts were not corrupted
>> as they are with RV250/280. So, I think that may support the idea of
>> there just being a bug in the R200 implementation.
>Yes, this was at time w
Apr 8, 2011 12:03:05 PM, test@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>The reason this is a fallacy is that you haven't established that the
>level of OpenGL support is the *only* difference between the
>configurations in question, and it certainly isn't. There are all sorts
>of others. As Ajax says, it's
On 10/26/2010 10:01 AM, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:37 -0400, mwesten wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2010 08:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:39 -0400, mwesten wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
On 10/25/2010 08:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:39 -0400, mwesten wrote:
>
>>>> Had another thought about this. There's a forum poster reporting similar
>>>> issue:
>>>>
>>>> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/show
/ >
/>/ > Had another thought about this. There's a forum poster reporting similar
/>/ > issue:
/>/ >
/>/ > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=253221
/>/ >
/>/ > (is that you, Steven?) and it made me think of this bug jlaska reported:
/>/
/>/ Nah - not me... Interestingly
23 matches
Mail list logo
