Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2013-07-06 10:50, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Bear in mind that anything you decide here should be applicable to the Gnome live spin as well. The KDE and Desktop (Gnome) spins are not included here, as they are release blocking, so they already have their own critera. Our release blocking

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-09 Thread Bill Nottingham
Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) said: > Each approved spin MUST have at least 2 people fill in the Basic spin > test matrix for at least 1 TC or RC. If the image fails, maintainers > can try again at the next milestone, but the image is NOT shipped for > that milestone. if an image doesn't get 2 peo

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-06 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/06/2013 05:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: People creating spins should be allowed to create sub community surrounding their spins and will not be able to do that with those insane requirements. If they have a "sub community" shouldn't that mean there's at least one other person in it that c

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:44:32 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/05/2013 05:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I'd like to propose some changes to the spins process for F20. > > I'm sending this just to the spins and test lists first, to try and > > hash out things, then we

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:18:49 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > We already have test cases for all of these. No need for new ones. ok. How can we denote the ones we desire tested for these? Basic Desktop? > > At the Alpha milestone, all approved spins will be created by > > rel-eng.

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-05 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 07/05/2013 05:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Greetings. I'd like to propose some changes to the spins process for F20. I'm sending this just to the spins and test lists first, to try and hash out things, then we can move on to running it the devel list once we have more concrete plans. You shoul

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2013-07-05 10:03, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Greetings. I'd like to propose some changes to the spins process for F20. I'm sending this just to the spins and test lists first, to try and hash out things, then we can move on to running it the devel list once we have more concrete plans. http://fedo

Re: [Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

2013-07-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:03:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: At Alpha: * The image boots with any method At Beta: * The image boots with all supported live media boot methods. How are those criteria different than alpha and beta? What are the exact methods being proposed for testing? I kn