On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 23:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:02 +, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
I do like litmus! It's a nice evolution from testopia for
upstream
mozilla. We don't currently have an 'unclear' test result.
I'm not
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:02 +, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
I do like litmus! It's a nice evolution from testopia for
upstream
mozilla. We don't currently have an 'unclear' test result.
I'm not
opposed to it, but would need better understand how
Greetings,
Many thanks for Samuel's comments, I found out many valuable things to
think, identify and add to use cases/feature comparison.
The questions also remind me that many testers so far may be still not
familiar with Nitrate, therefore can't give any suggestion upon it. So
I'll introduce
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:40 AM, He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote:
Also: It might be useful to add an unclear testcase result, similar
to how Mozilla's Litmus system does it (https://litmus.mozilla.org).
I do like litmus! It's a nice evolution from testopia for upstream
mozilla. We
Unfortunately while I am familiar with a few test case management systems, I
have not been involved with the Fedora project long enough to know its
workflows. And a quick search online is not turning up much about Nitrate,
with its changelog[1] implying it was first made open source software in
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 05:54 -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
Unfortunately while I am familiar with a few test case management
systems, I have not been involved with the Fedora project long enough
to know its workflows. And a quick search online is not turning up
much about Nitrate, with its
A few more inline comments on a subset of the questions, and two more thoughts:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:54 AM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 05:54 -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
1. What is the history of Nitrate and the Fedora Project? What
does
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:03 -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
A few more inline comments on a subset of the questions, and two more
thoughts:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:54 AM, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 05:54 -0500, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
1. What is
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote:
Greetings!
Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
organizing the events.
Please ignore the last mail.
Hi James,
Wow, firstly, many thanks for your careful review of all the items.:)
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:08 -0500, James Laska wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote:
Greetings!
Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general
Greetings!
Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
organizing the events.
Please review it:
11 matches
Mail list logo
