Thanks for the stats and information.
How big is the gap in testing.
Is there a significant amount of package releases etc walked back
because after they passed minimum time in QA and were published it
turned out they were broken ? Ie. percent wise or some other metric or
in the absence of
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:46 -0500, Vincent L. wrote:
Thanks for the stats and information.
How big is the gap in testing.
Is there a significant amount of package releases etc walked back
because after they passed minimum time in QA and were published it
turned out they were broken
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 09:15 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 08:46 -0500, Vincent L. wrote:
Thanks for the stats and information.
How big is the gap in testing.
Is there a significant amount of package releases etc walked back
because after they passed
On 02/13/2012 09:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Note that statistics are still gathered and that future changes might depend
on whether or not proventesters do a better job than average of correctly
tagging builds as good or bad.
Probably stating the obvious, and I am new around here, but the
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:35 -0500, Vincent L. wrote:
On 02/13/2012 09:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Note that statistics are still gathered and that future changes might depend
on whether or not proventesters do a better job than average of correctly
tagging builds as good or bad.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 18:20:38 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
As noted there, and as discussed at meetings and with FESCo, I'm hopeful
we'll be able to make use of proven tester status again once
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:17:12 +,
mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 18:20:38 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
As noted there, and as discussed at meetings and
Just wanted to make note of the current status of proven testers. As
decided by FESCo late last year, proven tester feedback now has exactly
the same status as non-proven tester feedback, effectively rendering it
pointless to be a proven tester.
I have added a note about this to the proven tester
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 18:20:38 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
As noted there, and as discussed at meetings and with FESCo, I'm hopeful
we'll be able to make use of proven tester status again once Bodhi 2.0
hits. Therefore I don't think we should take down all the
