On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:38 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this alpha criterion:
>
> 'The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to
> detect and mount an existing de
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
>
> 'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount
> (read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID (BIOS, hardware, and
> software) instal
> I wouldn't be hugely worried about waiving rescue mode for Alpha, but as
> others have said, it's more problematic if it's not going to come back
> for Beta or at least Final. Has Chris said anything about that?
My focus has been on getting a graphical UI ready to meet the alpha
criteria, plus s
I've already done this, I've realized it right after I post it, I'm
sorry.
!!
!PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD!!!
!!
On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 14:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at
On 07/27/2012 09:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, to a certain extent it's academic. I suspect that if QA was
strongly of the opinion that the feature isn't sufficiently complete,
FESCo would give substantial weight to that input in making its
determination. But it's FESCo that owns the featur
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 21:51 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 09:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> >>> It is about discussion to accept this change. If there wi
On 07/27/2012 09:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaco
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 14:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > > It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
> > > opinions against this change, we will let
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:38 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this alpha criterion:
>
> 'The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to
> detect and mount an existing de
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:59 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
> supported interfaces '
>
> to
>
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 07:19 -0700, Joe Wulf wrote:
> Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be
> moved to?
> That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are
> maintained, yet rational is provided for why they are not worked in
> this release.
>
>
> Just a th
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
> > opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaconda
> > will have to make their best to b
On 07/27/2012 02:24 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Generic rescue images would still work for most problems but I'd tend
to agree: a final release with a non-working rescue mode is pretty
uncool and seems like a bad precedent.
In any case if the plan is to extend installer initrd with the rescue
mo
On 07/27/2012 02:19 PM, Joe Wulf wrote:
Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be
moved to?
That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are
maintained, yet rational is provided for why they are not worked in
this release.
Well I suppose Anaconda could
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaconda
will have to make their best to bring rescue mod. We can also change
this criterion. It's on discussion. Note t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2012 02:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
>> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion
>> with Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
>>
>> 'The rescue mode of the
> From: Petr Schindler
>To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:14 AM
>Subject: Re: [criteria update] Rescue mode
>
>On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
>> > Because of changes
On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
> > Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> > Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
> >
> > 'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces '
to
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
suppor
Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
>
> 'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount
> (read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount
(read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID (BIOS, hardware, and
software) installations'
Re
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this alpha criterion:
'The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to
detect and mount an existing default installation'
Reason (according to Chris): There's been no w
22 matches
Mail list logo
