On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:03:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 17:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:33:34 -0700
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > Luke, I really think turning on critpath requirements for everything
>> > in the world is going to prove to b
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 17:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:33:34 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Luke, I really think turning on critpath requirements for everything
> > in the world is going to prove to be a problem. I certainly never
> > expected this to hit EPEL, AFAIK
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:33:34 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Luke, I really think turning on critpath requirements for everything
> in the world is going to prove to be a problem. I certainly never
> expected this to hit EPEL, AFAIK Fedora QA and FESCo have no actual
> power to commit to this poli
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 09:16 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> libsndfile for EL-5 has had a security vulnerability for many months,
> and now that it is actively maintained again, unfortunately hit the
> Bodhi proventester bottleneck (see forwarded announcement below)
>
> -
correction: 1 proventester needed, not two. Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> libsndfile for EL-5 has had a security vulnerability for many months,
> and now that it is actively maintained again, unfortunately hit the
> Bodhi provent
Hi folks,
libsndfile for EL-5 has had a security vulnerability for many months,
and now that it is actively maintained again, unfortunately hit the
Bodhi proventester bottleneck (see forwarded announcement below)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Luke Macken
Subject: Bodhi 0.7.5 rele
