Re: A Glorious Vision of Our Shared Update Feedback Future (bodhi, karma, and proventesters, oh my)

2011-12-02 Thread Tom Callaway
On 11/22/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey, folks. So in the recent proven tester discussion, and in various other threads, I've oft stated that the limits of the current Bodhi karma system are a significant problem, and the planned Bodhi 2.0 karma system has to potentially to

A Glorious Vision of Our Shared Update Feedback Future (bodhi, karma, and proventesters, oh my)

2011-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey, folks. So in the recent proven tester discussion, and in various other threads, I've oft stated that the limits of the current Bodhi karma system are a significant problem, and the planned Bodhi 2.0 karma system has to potentially to significantly improve our update testing process. But it

Re: A Glorious Vision of Our Shared Update Feedback Future (bodhi, karma, and proventesters, oh my)

2011-11-22 Thread Sandro red Mathys
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 22:03, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: 2. Any update marked as 'critpath breaking' by a proven tester would be blocked from being pushed stable at all - automatically or manually - until the PT modified the feedback or it was overridden by someone with

Re: A Glorious Vision of Our Shared Update Feedback Future (bodhi, karma, and proventesters, oh my)

2011-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:31 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 11/22/2011 09:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: 2. Any update marked as 'critpath breaking' by a proven tester would be blocked from being pushed stable at all - automatically or manually - until the PT modified the feedback or