On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply
with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
policy. [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the
policy.)
That sounds
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply
with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
policy. [1] (This is already
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
That sounds workable, so long as someone's actually making sure we
*do*
comply with those. Has anyone checked that yet? I'd rather not throw
it
in the criteria and then have to fudge it immediately :)
I don't think all apps are
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply
with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers
policy. [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the
policy.)
So Beta TC1
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Appearance is something we'd want to enforce if it were actually done,
but I get the impression the Qt variant of Adwaita isn't actually
written yet.
There's no need for such a thing. Qt renders apps with
Hi, folks. I wanted to ask if you envisage a need for release criteria
for Workstation at Beta (or Final) over and above those that already
exist for 'desktop' stuff. Areas I notice:
SSSD is listed in the tech spec. We have server-side requirements for
FreeIPA in the Server product; do we want to
