On 22/04/13 09:09 AM, Michael Spahn wrote:
Thank your for your detailed feedback.
Is there any special group with a focus on testing anaconda?
That would be us. Testing anaconda is probably 50% of what we do.
I think that just happened due to a lack of physical hardware to test
Fedora 18. :-
Thank your for your detailed feedback.
Is there any special group with a focus on testing anaconda?
I think that just happened due to a lack of physical hardware to test
Fedora 18. :-/
If I got your point right it's also no option to just update to the
latest anaconda (for example) and use the s
I think new builds is a bad idea, a response to a worst-case event that
hopefully never happens. If the quality assurance process that generated
multiple alpha, beta, and release candidate builds has failed, another
try to fix one more bug will have less complete testing: it is too likely
to add n
Dear Fedorians,
what should we do if we have bugs in critical parts of Fedora like
Anaconda, Kernel or other important and especially installation related
parts?
I suggest that we create updated ISOs in case of critical bugs.
We should specify some critea like:
* Fedora can't be installed (
