Re: F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Bill Nottingham wrote: > W.R.T. the Fedora bug, any provenpackager will do. Hey, wait, I'm one. > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2549666 Thanks. I'm just a regular packager. :P > > (Not intending to push this for F-14 myself, but if someone wants to > go ahead and do it as

Re: F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Bill Nottingham
Michael Cronenworth (m...@cchtml.com) said: > > It's almost certianly to own the directory... s-c-keyboard should be > > fixed to just dual-own it. > > There's a bug[1] as old as 2007 open for this. Who would be the right > people to poke to fix this simple spec issue? There's a Fedora one[2] >

Re: F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Bill Nottingham wrote: > It's almost certianly to own the directory... s-c-keyboard should be > fixed to just dual-own it. > There's a bug[1] as old as 2007 open for this. Who would be the right people to poke to fix this simple spec issue? There's a Fedora one[2] open as well. [1] https://bug

Re: F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Bill Nottingham
Steven I Usdansky (usdans...@rocketmail.com) said: > ~$ rpm -e --test firstboot > error: Failed dependencies: > firstboot is needed by (installed) > system-config-keyboard-1.3.1-2.fc14.x86_64 > Not that I normally need to reconfigure my keyboard, but this doesn't seem > right. Also, this is

Re: F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Steven I Usdansky
~$ rpm -e --test firstboot error: Failed dependencies: firstboot is needed by (installed) system-config-keyboard-1.3.1-2.fc14.x86_64 Not that I normally need to reconfigure my keyboard, but this doesn't seem right. Also, this is not the first time it's come up: http://lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 10:53 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Steven I Usdansky wrote: > > Looks like something is missing in openbox 3.4.11.2-5.fc14 > > yum upgrade openbox now wants to install metacity to satisfy > > the firstboot(windowmanager) dependency > > Might want to check out your --ch

Re: F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Steven I Usdansky wrote: > Looks like something is missing in openbox 3.4.11.2-5.fc14 > yum upgrade openbox now wants to install metacity to satisfy > the firstboot(windowmanager) dependency Might want to check out your --changelog. :) Per the changelog: https://bugzila.redhat.com/643416 Looks l

F14 openbox upgrade requires metacity - wtf???

2010-10-22 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Looks like something is missing in openbox 3.4.11.2-5.fc14 yum upgrade openbox now wants to install metacity to satisfy the firstboot(windowmanager) dependency ~$ rpm -q --provides openbox config(openbox) = 3.4.11.2-4.fc14.1 firstboot(windowmanager) openbox = 3.4.11.2-4.fc14.1 openbox(x86-64) =