Well I see your point, but it kind of cuts both ways - Josef clearly
got
confused by a few cases where we overload test cases to test several
different things, so you can argue that it's actually more
'accessible'
when we try to stick to 'one test case tests one thing'. But your
approach
- Original Message -
From: Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com
No, this is a game of spot five differences :-) At least one versus
all virtual consoles. This can be part of the same test case, marked
as Alpha/Beta
OK, I'll update the summary page/matrix accordingly. Also I'll try to
Hi,
I started to connect criterions to testcases for the F18 testing. So far, the
Alpha is done (the messy page with criterions links to testcases can be found
here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jskladan/Sandbox:F18_Criteria_Testcases_Alpha),
and it looks all right. Some problems I've
Hi,
I started to connect criterions to testcases for the F18 testing. So
far, the Alpha is done (the messy page with criterions links to
testcases can be found here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jskladan/Sandbox:F18_Criteria_Testcases_Alpha),
and it looks all right. Some problems
Beta is done
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jskladan/Sandbox:F18_Criteria_Testcases_Beta,
some issues I've come around:
--
5. The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and either NFS or
NFSISO remote package source options
- The testcase
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 06:51 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
10. The installer must be able to install each of the release
blocking desktops, as well as the minimal package set, with each
supported installation method
- We have testcase for the minimal install
We have this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Package_Sets_Default_Package_Install
That covers GNOME. We could modify it and ask the tester to pick
any
one of the release blocking desktops to be installed. Do we want to
make it fuzzy? (You won't know exactly what was
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 18:47 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
I think 'the default package set install works' is a Thing in itself,
so
I'd probably be more in favour of adding a separate test case which
covers installing each of the release-blocking desktops and can be
marked as 'pass' only if
