Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 18:04 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 27/04/16 09:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on > > with F24 Beta: > > > > we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we > > can spin a

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 27/04/16 09:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on > with F24 Beta: > > we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we > can spin a 'release candidate': > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330 >

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 11:32 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700, >> Adam Williamson wrote: >> > >> > So please expect the RC to arrive in the

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on > with F24 Beta: > > we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we > can spin a 'release candidate': > >

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 20:35 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/27/2016 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on > > > with F24 Beta: > > > > > > we have two outstanding

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Kalev Lember
On 04/27/2016 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on with F24 Beta: we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we can spin a 'release candidate':

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:11:24AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > (only built for F23 for some reason) - please do try it out and give > feedback. But we can't do an F24 RC with this issue outstanding, > really. We could try an extremely dodgy 'it's not really a blocker' > fudge or some kind of

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on > with F24 Beta: > > we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we > can spin a 'release candidate': > >

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 11:32 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700, > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all > > goes well, and be ready to test :) It won't be super

Re: F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all goes well, and be ready to test :) It won't be super different from the current nightly, but we'll at least need to do sanity testing

F24 Beta status

2016-04-27 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on with F24 Beta: we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we can spin a 'release candidate': https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321330 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 a