Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 18:25:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: Misc: I haven't filed bureaucracy bugs for them yet, but we do still need to make sure the final artwork, release notes, fedora-release (and generic-release) and spin-kickstarts are all in place prior to ship. spin-kickstarts-0.

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-28 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 10:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > If something is FTBFS there ought to be a bug report for it - have you > attached the patch there? Thanks! Yep. There's a FTBFS bug report and I've attached the updated spec with required changes to it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 18:15 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 12:10 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > ncmpcpp in > > Fedora is in FTBFS status. > > Updated spec with fix attached. It's just the new unversioned package > doc dir change. If something is FTBFS there ought to be a b

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-28 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 15:18 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > Yes, but we still need to wait for the irresponsive maintainer > maybe... A proven packager could apply the update in time being. I'll try to get in touch with the maintainer to request co-maintainership of the package since I use it on

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Christopher Meng
Yes, but we still need to wait for the irresponsive maintainer maybe... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 12:10 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > ncmpcpp in > Fedora is in FTBFS status. Updated spec with fix attached. It's just the new unversioned package doc dir change. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come

Re: Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Christopher Meng
I've added 2 karma on system-config-services and taglib. However after looking into taglib issue deeply I found that ncmpcpp in Fedora is in FTBFS status. Thanks. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 20 Final blocker bug status report (ACTIONS REQUIRED: karma from QA, fixes from devs)

2013-11-27 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. We have just over one week to the Fedora 20 Go/No-Go meeting, and a big happy pile of blocker bugs - everyone's having fun! In order to be able to complete testing in time for the go/no-go meeting comprehensively and comfortably, we would need a build with all these bugs addressed by the